Jump to content

User talk:Brian K. Tyler: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 16: Line 16:


Yes [[User:Brian K. Tyler|Brian K. Tyler]] ([[User talk:Brian K. Tyler#top|talk]]) 23:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)</p>
Yes [[User:Brian K. Tyler|Brian K. Tyler]] ([[User talk:Brian K. Tyler#top|talk]]) 23:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)</p>

So the answer to my question is no. Are you trying to say it’s impossible to eat a lollipop without eating the person holding it? I’m sorry but I have not seen enough evidence to overturn my original position so far.


== Welcome! ==
== Welcome! ==

Revision as of 23:47, 1 February 2021

Hello Bryan! I disagree with your edits of (Rio2) As I saw in the movie, Big Boss runs away as Linda and Tulio chase him, and they fail to catch him. I saw no evidence of him being eaten by a snake, and cannot in good conscience allow a poor edit to stand. Hope we can resolve this to avoid any further edit warring and your being blocked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1014:B112:1659:CCC6:94B5:62E2:AAE2 (talk) 23:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You want evidence? Here it is [[You Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

<ref> {{cite web}}: Empty citation (help) </ ref> Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Bryan, the link you have posted does not work. As I said I watched the movie recently and didn’t see anything resembling a snake eating a man. I am trying to be as courteous and respectful as possible.

<ref> "Rare Villain Defeats: Big Boss". YouTube. July 9, 2017.</ ref> Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check out "Rare Villain Deafeats: Big Boss" on YouTube. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry Bryan, I don’t see a snake eating a person in that clip? Maybe I’m confused but could you clarify for me? Do we see a snake eat a person in the clip? Yes or no please

It's not overly explicit because it's a family movie, but it's made clear that the snake ate the person, as he spit out the lollipop he had. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So the answer to my question is no. Are you trying to say it’s impossible to eat a lollipop without eating the person holding it? I’m sorry but I have not seen enough evidence to overturn my original position so far.

Welcome!

Hello, Brian K. Tyler! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! JACKINTHEBOXTALK 04:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Hey

Maybe you'd have more fun on Wikia. After all, they're not picky about verification and reliable sources and stuff like that. Drmies (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shawn Patterson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 04:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scoob!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fred Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 04:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Scoob!, you may be blocked from editing. Template:Z188 Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor 15:27, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m Sorry. I only added at the name Crown to Brian’s last name once, because I thought it was more efficient to put in a character’s full name. I never meant to vandalize anything. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 00:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies then, some other IP addresses have been putting this in recently and I thought you and them were the same person. Generally, even if a character's last name is revealed in another series/film, if it's not revealed in the specific production, then it's not appropriate to add it to the credits on that article. He is not specifically called Brian Crown at all in this film, so best to leave it off. Cheers, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor 15:11, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Princess and the Frog, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Bartlett.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bob Bergen. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Information icon Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 20:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 20:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rio 2; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 174.212.222.48 (talk) 01:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May you please just change it back the way it was? The villain Big Boss from Rio 2 was eaten by an anaconda. He did not escape unscathed. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 01:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Look, you've been here over a year. There's a welcome template at the top of the page and processes to use if you want to change an article. Your suppositions about how you are REQUIRED to interact with other editors are completely incorrect. I'd be more than happy to help you understand your errors, but hey, I'm just an IP. According to you, definitively a vandal. Good luck. 174.212.222.48 (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But why are you in favor of [[1]] anyway? Brian K. Tyler (talk) 02:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rio 2. placing a protection template on an unprotected article is disruptive....but then again, so is edit warring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.212.222.48 (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]