Jump to content

Talk:Suhaldev: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
WP India, correction list as
No edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:
* [[commons:File:Suheldev pasi.jpg|Suheldev pasi.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-06-26T07:07:03.896158 | Suheldev pasi.jpg -->
* [[commons:File:Suheldev pasi.jpg|Suheldev pasi.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-06-26T07:07:03.896158 | Suheldev pasi.jpg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Suheldev pasi.jpg|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 07:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Suheldev pasi.jpg|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 07:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)


== He's Suheldev, not Suhaldev ==
He's Suheldev, not Suhaldev

Revision as of 05:52, 16 February 2021

Lacks NPOV

Lacks NPOV.

Examples of not being neutral : semi-legendary Indian king, gossipy feel

This article reads more as how the events are interpreted today and less about Suheldev and what he is known for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhariram (talkcontribs) 12:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Gossipy feel" is in quotes, and attributed to a source. Mirat-i-Masudi is "a historical romance in which fact and fiction are freely mingled". If you think that it does not have a gossipy feel and is a reliable historical chronicle, find a source and add it to the article.
"Semi-legendary" is not POV either: no epigraphic, numismatic or archaeological evidence attests Suheldev. He is known from Mirat-i-Masudi, which, as stated above, is not a reliable source for history. The Mirat-i-Masudi only states that Suhaldev defeated Masood's army: the rest of the information about him is a result of 19th century inventions. In fact, scholars like Badri Narayan call it "the myth of Suahldev". So, obviously, the king is semi-legendary (if not completely mythical).
Suheldev's importance stems from his use in caste/religion-based propaganda. So, it's understandable that a substantial portion of the article is focused on how the story of Suhaldev is interpreted today. If there was more historical information available about him, the article would mention it. If you have such information, feel free to add it to the article with acceptable sources. utcursch | talk 16:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, page is without a lot of content backed by historical research. I was unable to find content on the net. If they are no further objections, I will try to create a more neutral version reflecting popular tales. Santosh L (talk) 18:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 August 2017

India.rajbhar (talk) 13:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: as you have not requested a change.
Please request your change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


He's Suheldev, not Suhaldev

He's Suheldev, not Suhaldev