User talk:TheTechRobo3641: Difference between revisions
→Links to draft articles: new section |
→Links to draft articles: Reply |
||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not introduce [[WP:LINK|links]] in actual articles to [[WP:DRAFT|draft]] articles, as you did to [[:Enlightenment (software)]]. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the [[MOS:DRAFTNOLINK|Manual of Style]]. {{#ifeq:{{lc:}}|yes|An edit has converted these links, into links to the not-currently-existing page (redlinks) where the draft will be placed if it is eventually accepted. Thus the links will automatically become valid links aimed at the correct target when and if the draft is accepted.|These links have been removed.}} Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-draft-link --> - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 14:41, 6 April 2021 (UTC) |
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not introduce [[WP:LINK|links]] in actual articles to [[WP:DRAFT|draft]] articles, as you did to [[:Enlightenment (software)]]. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the [[MOS:DRAFTNOLINK|Manual of Style]]. {{#ifeq:{{lc:}}|yes|An edit has converted these links, into links to the not-currently-existing page (redlinks) where the draft will be placed if it is eventually accepted. Thus the links will automatically become valid links aimed at the correct target when and if the draft is accepted.|These links have been removed.}} Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-draft-link --> - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 14:41, 6 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
:Ah, makes sense. Won't do it again :) [[User:TheTechRobo3641|TheTechRobo]] ([[User talk:TheTechRobo3641#top|talk]]) 19:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:27, 6 April 2021
March 2018
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ford Nucleon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ford Nucleon was changed by TheTechRobo3641 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928939 on 2018-03-11T15:37:40+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Ford Nucleon. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. OcarinaOfTime (talk) 15:40, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi! To answer your e-mail - the above revert was simply due to the fact you didn't add a reference to directly back up what you were saying. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for more information. OcarinaOfTime (talk) 15:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Ford Nucleon. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ford Nucleon. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:02, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:NOOBS (New Out-Of-Box Software), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:NOOBS (New Out-Of-Box Software)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, TheTechRobo3641. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NOOBS".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
![]() |
Hi TheTechRobo3641! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Enlightenment (software). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:41, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, makes sense. Won't do it again :) TheTechRobo (talk) 19:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)