User talk:TheTechRobo3641

March 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ford Nucleon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ford Nucleon was changed by TheTechRobo3641 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928939 on 2018-03-11T15:37:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Ford Nucleon. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. OcarinaOfTime (talk) 15:40, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! To answer your e-mail - the above revert was simply due to the fact you didn't add a reference to directly back up what you were saying. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for more information. OcarinaOfTime (talk) 15:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Ford Nucleon. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ford Nucleon. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:02, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:NOOBS (New Out-Of-Box Software) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:NOOBS (New Out-Of-Box Software), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NOOBS (New Out-Of-Box Software)[edit]

Hello, TheTechRobo3641. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NOOBS".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi TheTechRobo3641! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles[edit]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Enlightenment (software). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:41, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, makes sense. Won't do it again :) TheTechRobo (talk) 19:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sponsorware[edit]

Hello, TheTechRobo3641. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sponsorware, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EliveLinux (July 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm just not seeing the in depth coverage in reliable secondary sources for this. The https://www.theregister.com/ source is pretty much the only source which meets the criteria in my eyes.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EliveLinux and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:EliveLinux, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 20:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheTechRobo3641! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 20:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sponsorware[edit]

Hello, TheTechRobo3641. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sponsorware".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, TheTechRobo3641. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Elive, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. IMO Moderator/Trusted user at a forum is a close connection. -- Yae4 (talk) 22:44, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, TheTechRobo3641, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Elive does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Yae4 (talk) 11:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which edit is that? TheTechRobo (talk) 22:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just following up here - what edit that I made was not neutral? Just so that I know what not to do. :-) TheTechRobo (talk) 00:49, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a generic NPOV template, referencing an article where you may have COI. -- Yae4 (talk) 18:17, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]