Jump to content

Talk:Oaktree Capital Management: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Add disclosure
Line 14: Line 14:
== Edit request ==
== Edit request ==


{{request edit}}
{{Request edit|D}}
Hi, I work for Oaktree Capital Management and therefore have a conflict of interest.
Hi, I work for Oaktree Capital Management and therefore have a conflict of interest.


Line 22: Line 22:


Thanks for your help, [[User:LeiaVOaktree|LeiaVOaktree]] ([[User talk:LeiaVOaktree|talk]]) 09:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your help, [[User:LeiaVOaktree|LeiaVOaktree]] ([[User talk:LeiaVOaktree|talk]]) 09:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' <!-- Template:ECOI --> If the charts and the assets section were removed, the article would be nothing more than a stub. [[User:Quetstar|Quetstar]] ([[User talk:Quetstar|talk]]) 15:43, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:43, 12 October 2021

Edit request

Hi, I work for Oaktree Capital Management and therefore have a conflict of interest.

In 2019, Brookfield Asset Management acquired a 61% majority of Oaktree Capital, all of the common Class A stock, which effectively delisted Oaktree from the New York Stock exchange, moving Oaktree from being a publicly listed entity to a privately held one. As such, much of the information in the current article is significantly outdated and will not be updated, and is of questionable relevance to its current operations and corporate structure as a privately held entity.

I'd like to propose the removal of the detailed funds charts, including Closed-end funds, Open-end funds and Evergreen funds, as well as those listed under the "Assets" headline, as they are no longer relevant and do not enhance the Wikipedia article as a whole.

Thanks for your help, LeiaVOaktree (talk) 09:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: If the charts and the assets section were removed, the article would be nothing more than a stub. Quetstar (talk) 15:43, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]