Talk:Doublespeak: Difference between revisions
merge |
→Examples may need review: new section Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Examples may need review == |
|||
I think some of the examples of Doublespeak should be reviewed for correctness. For example, characterizing "handouts" as doublespeak because payments to the military are not also referred to as handouts is not apropos. When military spending is for useless armaments or political purposes other than conducting warfare, then it is indeed referred to as handouts or "pork". Regular military spending cannot be considered equivalent to entitlement spending because the money is normally spent to buy something, either hardware or service by personnel, whereas entitlement spending does not come with an expectation of getting anything in return, or at least anything of equal value. In other words, military spending is a trade of value, but entitlement spending is a gift, hence the word "handout". |
|||
In general, some of the other examples given are either weak or simply wrong for similar reasons. In fact, there is almost an ironic politics to some of the examples. In other words, Chomsky's complaint about the use of the word handouts could almost be considered to be doublespeak itself. Or maybe that was the author's intention? |
Revision as of 10:42, 28 December 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Doublespeak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 365 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Examples may need review
I think some of the examples of Doublespeak should be reviewed for correctness. For example, characterizing "handouts" as doublespeak because payments to the military are not also referred to as handouts is not apropos. When military spending is for useless armaments or political purposes other than conducting warfare, then it is indeed referred to as handouts or "pork". Regular military spending cannot be considered equivalent to entitlement spending because the money is normally spent to buy something, either hardware or service by personnel, whereas entitlement spending does not come with an expectation of getting anything in return, or at least anything of equal value. In other words, military spending is a trade of value, but entitlement spending is a gift, hence the word "handout".
In general, some of the other examples given are either weak or simply wrong for similar reasons. In fact, there is almost an ironic politics to some of the examples. In other words, Chomsky's complaint about the use of the word handouts could almost be considered to be doublespeak itself. Or maybe that was the author's intention?
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- High-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- High-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- C-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class novel articles
- Low-importance novel articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- C-Class Linguistics articles
- Unknown-importance Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles