Talk:Phineas Gage: Difference between revisions
HagermanBot (talk | contribs) m 213.114.165.4 didn't sign: "Retain / Regain consciousness " |
|||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
== Retain / Regain consciousness == |
== Retain / Regain consciousness == |
||
Wasn't it so that he retained consciousness after having it shot trough the head? |
Wasn't it so that he retained consciousness after having it shot trough the head? [[User:Nsoltani|Nsoltani]] 15:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:42, 10 February 2007
Medicine GA‑class | ||||||||||
|
Trains GA‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Biography GA‑class | |||||||
|
Template:WPCD-People Template:GA-bio people
Removed the following:
- As a less positive result, this case also helped lead to the creation of frontal lobotomy, which was a quite controversial psychosurgical measure in use in the early 20th century that has been since superseded.
As it is almost certainly erroneous. Unfortunately the Moniz page on whonamedit.com (see this link) suggests a connection between Gage and the development of psychosurgery where there is very little evidence to support it.
There is a page with a comprehensive analysis of this issue here which again suggests the development of lobotomy / leucotomy procedures by Moniz and Freeman and Watts had little to do with Gage's case.
- Vaughan 21:11, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Very well. I had read that a while ago, but if it is truly disconnected then perhaps it was better to remove it. I won't push this anymore except to say that we should probably mention in the article that a connection between Gage and leucotomy has been suggested by some groups of people, but is not generally accepted. -- EmperorBMA / ブリイアン 06:31, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Good idea. I've added some text to that effect (and the link above). Feel free to make changes if necessary. - Vaughan 09:23, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Hanna Damasio and not Antonio as first writter of the investigation mentioned
The person that really investigated about Phineas Gage and made the computer simulation (see picture) that appears in the article mentioned was Hanna Damasio and not his husband Antonio. She is the first writter (and therefore the most important one) while his husband is only one of a group of secondary writters. Even if Antonio is a better known neurologist this is no reason to give him the merit of an article. Antonio himself in his book Descarte´s error says that was his wife the one conducting this investigation.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Garrondo (talk • contribs) 12:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC).
Images copyrighted
I suspect that these images are copyrighted as they both come from journal articles: Image 1, Image 2
If you uploaded them, can you provide some copyright information for them, otherwise they are liable to be removed.
- Vaughan 13:10, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
Image Reversed?
It appears the computer-generate image may be reversed, as compared with the image of the damage in Gage's skull.
Death?
Does anyone have any specific details to Gage's death? I've heard he has died of convulsions/seizures but I'm not sure. David 03:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Another element of the accident
I don't have a citation for it (because I read it years ago, don't remember where), but regarding his accident, it was noted that the resulting hole was smaller than the diameter of the pipe, and recently it has been suggested that the skullbone suture at the top of his head flexed outward to allow the pipe to pass. I don't know if it's a significant addition to the article or if it would require a citation.--Anchoress 12:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Apology for Tycho
I accidentally reverted to the wrong version, and attributed the vandalism to you. Sorry. It should be fixed now. Zuiram 06:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Retain / Regain consciousness
Wasn't it so that he retained consciousness after having it shot trough the head? Nsoltani 15:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)