* [[commons:File:Mongol Invasion of China.png|Mongol Invasion of China.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-04-14T21:55:00.217934 | Mongol Invasion of China.png -->
* [[commons:File:Mongol Invasion of China.png|Mongol Invasion of China.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-04-14T21:55:00.217934 | Mongol Invasion of China.png -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mongol Invasion of China.png|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 21:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mongol Invasion of China.png|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 21:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
== Arrow in the knee ==
I removed this sentence and citation as the citation didn't support the claim at all. I'm not sure when it was entered as it seems to have been there for a long time. The citation is freely available on archive.org here[https://archive.org/details/genghiskhan0000manj/page/158/mode/2up] for those who wish to read the cited text. To be thorough, when I noticed the claim went back past 2010 when this book was published, I did some more digging and found another edition of the book published in 2004 (and titled slightly differently). This version[https://archive.org/details/genghiskhanlifed0000manj_q4g0/page/158/mode/2up] of the book does mention him being wounded by an arrow, but makes absolutely no mention of it hitting his knee at all. Just simply that he was wounded. I'm not quite sure how to treat that. If a later edition of a book removes something an earlier edition mentioned, there could be a reason for it, like it was found to not be verifiable.--[[Special:Contributions/222.109.91.138|222.109.91.138]] ([[User talk:222.109.91.138|talk]]) 02:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Revision as of 02:36, 19 March 2022
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
Meng Fanfeng iS^ll# "A study of the Yuan painter Shi Gang's epitaph" Tnttfc&SfettiE&Bi, WW, 1997:7, pp 71-74 ^ Discovered in the northern area of Shijiazhuang city, ... The epitaph reveals that Shi Gang's life spanned the years 1237 to 1315.
Of Meng-ku Pa-erh's seven sons, one was appointed to the office of Sung-chou ta -lu-hua-ch'ih/3 One of Meng-ku Pa-erh's six daughters married a son of the influential Shih T'ien-tse (1202-1275), a member of a Chinese clan that was recruited ...
I have just modified one external link on Mongol conquest of the Jin dynasty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I removed this sentence and citation as the citation didn't support the claim at all. I'm not sure when it was entered as it seems to have been there for a long time. The citation is freely available on archive.org here[1] for those who wish to read the cited text. To be thorough, when I noticed the claim went back past 2010 when this book was published, I did some more digging and found another edition of the book published in 2004 (and titled slightly differently). This version[2] of the book does mention him being wounded by an arrow, but makes absolutely no mention of it hitting his knee at all. Just simply that he was wounded. I'm not quite sure how to treat that. If a later edition of a book removes something an earlier edition mentioned, there could be a reason for it, like it was found to not be verifiable.--222.109.91.138 (talk) 02:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
