User talk:Dr.Pinsky: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:40, 9 April 2022

Welcome!

Hi Dr.Pinsky! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm Heba Aisha. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1019762330 Heba Aisha (talk) 09:10, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Arrayed Tales, from its old location at User:Dr.Pinsky/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arrayed Tales (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arrayed Tales and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arrayed Tales, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dr.Pinsky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sundhi

In this page please remove the line which tells that Sundhi or soundik belongs to scheduled caste In West Bengal . I guess sunri is getting confused with soundik/sundhi. Even the support attachments of West Bengal talks about the sunri caste not sundhi. Please make a change. 2405:201:1007:A158:C03A:A61B:A335:BFE1 (talk) 10:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir/Madam, please take your concerns here Talk:Sundhi. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 19:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Sir/Madam, I didn't added any external link to Jaiswal (surname). All were verified citation created to support the sentences which you are continuously reverting blindly by java codes. It would be better to took your time and verify all of it. the First citation was for Liquor selling business made from PDF report generated for Government of West Bengal. The Second Citiaion was made to Support Vaishya Status by India TV(a prominent Indian TV News Channel) and by The Econimics Times (The Subsidary of The Times of India) and the third citation was for Somvanshiya Kshatirya Staus by Dainik Bhaskar (World 4th Largest Selling Newspaper) and Navbharat times. There is also book reference of People of India: Delhi by K. S. Singh and Daughters of the earth by Smita Tewari Jassal a notable historian. It would by better if you read all these references to satisfy yourself so that you can stop vandalizing the page. Thanks. Swapnil1101 (talk) 21:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir/Madam, I have just reverted your poorly sourced POV edits. Don’t refer constructive edit as vandalism. Now coming to the sources, as per WP:RS, India TV, The Times of India, Dainik Bhaskar, Navbharat times and matrimonial sites(jeevansathi.com) are not considered reliable on this project. As explained by me earlier, you will have to provide scholarly sources for the history/caste-related details. Also you have directly added level 2 warning. Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do . Also read WP:NOTVAND, WP:RS & WP:V first before writing on my talk page. Further, for article related discussions/improvement, use the article's talk page. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 08:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Yarlovtsi, from its old location at User:Dr.Pinsky/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 15:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yarlovtsi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yarlovtsi. Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 15:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yarlovtsi has been accepted

Yarlovtsi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sundhi / soundik

You are providing wrong info about this caste Please make sure you are updated . If you don’t have knowledge about this please stay away from this topic 2405:201:1007:A0B0:8E:3096:A0F7:478B (talk) 22:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir/Madam, What's your context here? The article is well sourced and ample WP:RS have been provided. Please read them, if the content is misrepresenting them in any way, discuss the matter at the article's talk page Talk:Sundhi and seek consensus. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 09:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Pinsky I also think sundhi is misinterpreted with sunri They both are totally different could you please have a look and edit the same . JockerEdit (talk) 12:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir/Madam, please take your concerns here Talk:Sundhi. Also read WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:OR and WP:MOS#Grammar_and_usage. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 06:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pinsky I guess it’s mistaken from sunri caste . I know this caste very well and it’s not an Dalit caste I don’t know format to edit I request you to remove the word from Dalit to vashya . JockerEdit (talk) 13:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know much about these keyword I can read npov and all but i am just mentioning it’s not correct info JockerEdit (talk) 13:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JokerEdit: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a WP:RS. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 13:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Revert

If you can't provide satisfactory explanation, your recent revert at Baidya article would count as a vandalism. Nobita456 (talk) 18:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Dr.Pinsky, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to hear you intend to help us with our coverage of women historians. Although you have been highly active as an editor, you have not yet created any biographies. You should therefore find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. As for historians, you'll find lots of names of interest in our Redlist index, including a Wikidata-based list of historians. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April Editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228

Online events:

New: Gender studies | French overseas territories
New Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Translation contest
Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman

Other ways to participate:

Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Suvarnabaniks

Hello Pinsky, I am not sure about your concerns. First you put OR tag on top article without explaining the reasons for it. Then you are supporting a major content removal, which doesn't fall under WP:REMOVAL, and again without appropriate explanations. I understand there could be a genuine mistake, so I fixed the citations. If you still have concerns, please start discussing on talk page, so that we can find a solution collaboratively. Thank you.Chanchaldm (talk) 01:59, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you're supposed to initiate the discussion. Isn't it? Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 09:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First I needed to know your concerns.Chanchaldm (talk) 11:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clayola Brown has been accepted

Clayola Brown, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Random revert?

User:Dr.Pinsky Are you aware what you are doing?

I added the information supported by the sources and removed what isn't supported by the sources.

You are supporting an editor who just got a final warning[1] few hours ago for his disruptive editing and he just had his report rejected against me.[2]

I also resolved the tags that were added by this user and he thanked me on talk page for resolving them.[3]

P.S. this user is violating 3RR on other article too. [4]

I am sure that your revert was completely random, but you should just undo your own edit because it restored the bad version. 106.215.40.96 (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to AGF, but, this really is a lot. Am I the only one starting to find the sudden appearance of this IP on this very specific article, with this kind of mentality, and so well versed in the WP processes (much more than me, obviously!) a little... fishy? EnlightenmentNow1792 (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you wanted to AGF then you wouldn't be dropping 2 baseless warning templates on my talk page. 106.215.40.96 (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:38, 9 April 2022 edit EnlightenmentNow1792 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,132 edits →‎Random revert? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:40, 9 April 2022 edit undo 106.215.40.96 (talk) →‎Random revert? Next edit →
Line 171:		Line 171:

	::I want to AGF, but, this really is a lot. Am I the only one starting to find the sudden appearance of this IP on this very specific article, with this kind of mentality, and so well versed in the WP processes (much more than me, obviously!) a little... fishy? [[User:EnlightenmentNow1792\|EnlightenmentNow1792]] ([[User talk:EnlightenmentNow1792\|talk]]) 18:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)		::I want to AGF, but, this really is a lot. Am I the only one starting to find the sudden appearance of this IP on this very specific article, with this kind of mentality, and so well versed in the WP processes (much more than me, obviously!) a little... fishy? [[User:EnlightenmentNow1792\|EnlightenmentNow1792]] ([[User talk:EnlightenmentNow1792\|talk]]) 18:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
			:::If you wanted to AGF then you wouldn't be dropping 2 baseless warning templates on my talk page. [[Special:Contributions/106.215.40.96\|106.215.40.96]] ([[User talk:106.215.40.96\|talk]]) 18:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)