Jump to content

Talk:Kirk–Holden war: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment: banner shell, African diaspora, Military history, United States (Low) (Rater)
→‎Untitled: explained change
Line 19: Line 19:


This piece might well have mentioned that it wasn't until the Republicans retook control of the state senate in 2010 (for the first time since 1870) that the issue of Holden's impeachment was addressed by that body. Yes the vote was unanimous, but it wasn't brought up while the Democrats retained control of the state senate. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/148.129.71.129|148.129.71.129]] ([[User talk:148.129.71.129#top|talk]]) 18:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
This piece might well have mentioned that it wasn't until the Republicans retook control of the state senate in 2010 (for the first time since 1870) that the issue of Holden's impeachment was addressed by that body. Yes the vote was unanimous, but it wasn't brought up while the Democrats retained control of the state senate. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/148.129.71.129|148.129.71.129]] ([[User talk:148.129.71.129#top|talk]]) 18:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

I added a detail previously that Holden wasn't pardoned until Republicans regained control of the state legislature for the first time since 1870. It was deleted by moderator Indy Beetle who said "cool trivia but I don't think WRAL really makes a big deal out of this one." That's not the point. The link to WRAL was just to add a source. The point is that it took 140 years until the legislature changed hands until something was done about Holden's impeachment. This is political context which explains why it took so long for the issue to be addressed.


{{Talk:Kirk–Holden war/GA1}}
{{Talk:Kirk–Holden war/GA1}}

Revision as of 19:35, 13 April 2022

Untitled

I found this important event on the most wanted articles page. My grandfather and grandmother grew up in North Carolina so it was great to learn some history about it. It's a little rough currently, but I'll be updating it periodically.

Any feedback is appreciated. ~~Te00539~~


I don't entirely agree that this article should have been edited to the bone without any explanation on the discussion page. As it now stands, this article is really superficial and leaves far too many questions unanswered, for example, as this is clearly a race struggle, I think it's relevant to say whether John W. Stephens is white or black. Also a little about why he may have been murdered. Was he an advocate for black rights? Was he trying to help black voters get to the polls? What was the African American community's reaction to Holden's actions? Did anybody think Holden's actions did, in fact, stop a lynching epidemic? What record of his reasoning did Holden leave on the subject of his actions? I totally agree with wikipedia's policy on neutrality, but attempts to achieve that the easy way, by just hitting the delete key and no explanation, are really counterproductive.--Georgiasouthernlynn (talk) 17:39, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This piece might well have mentioned that it wasn't until the Republicans retook control of the state senate in 2010 (for the first time since 1870) that the issue of Holden's impeachment was addressed by that body. Yes the vote was unanimous, but it wasn't brought up while the Democrats retained control of the state senate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.129.71.129 (talk) 18:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added a detail previously that Holden wasn't pardoned until Republicans regained control of the state legislature for the first time since 1870. It was deleted by moderator Indy Beetle who said "cool trivia but I don't think WRAL really makes a big deal out of this one." That's not the point. The link to WRAL was just to add a source. The point is that it took 140 years until the legislature changed hands until something was done about Holden's impeachment. This is political context which explains why it took so long for the issue to be addressed.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kirk–Holden war/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 16:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Happy to review. Two points for the start, more to follow:

  • in the state of North Carolina in 1870 in the United States – bit confusing to have a place followed by a date followed by a place. Maybe we don't need "United States" here?
    • Revised to put the date last. I'm loathe to not specify where North Carolina is, as per WP:Global we can't expect that everyone will know it's an American place.
  • 1st North Carolina Troops and 2nd North Carolina Troops – maybe "1st and 2nd North Carolina Troops"? --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • sending North Carolina Adjutant-General A. W. Fisher to Richmond, Virginia speak with General Edward Canby, – is a "to" missing here?
    • I don't think so...seems like a filler word. I could revise the sentence, as it's a long one.
  • Upon arriving, Kirk learned that congressional candidates James Madison Leach and William L. Scott were holding a debate in the courthouse. – Why where these arrested, have they been on some list?
    • Only Leach, the Democrat, was detained, but Scott vouched for him and had him released. The sources don't say whether Leach was on a list.
  • The resolution requires approval from the House in order to be put into effect. – But was it approved in the end?
    • Media coverage ends there, and I don't think the House every completed this step, so this is where it stands; Holden has never been completely pardoned.
  • That's all, very nice work; I like the background section that places everything into context. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]