Talk:Zurab I, Duke of Aragvi: Difference between revisions
→Stop distorting Georgian History.: new section |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:::Oh, and thanks for linking that source. Looks good! Just got myself an online readable version of it as we speak. ;-) - [[User:LouisAragon|LouisAragon]] ([[User talk:LouisAragon|talk]]) 02:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC) |
:::Oh, and thanks for linking that source. Looks good! Just got myself an online readable version of it as we speak. ;-) - [[User:LouisAragon|LouisAragon]] ([[User talk:LouisAragon|talk]]) 02:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC) |
||
::::Good! Well, the book, as any other source, is not immune to inaccuracies and inconsistencies, but, by far, it is the most comprehensive and up-to-date genealogical study of the Georgian nobility. Attempts have been made by authors of those chapters to address these issues at [http://nobility.pro/ nobility.pro], but, unfortunately, it is not yet a sufficiently well-structured source and no printed version is available. --[[User:Kober|Kober]]<sup>[[User talk:Kober|Talk]]</sup> 15:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC) |
::::Good! Well, the book, as any other source, is not immune to inaccuracies and inconsistencies, but, by far, it is the most comprehensive and up-to-date genealogical study of the Georgian nobility. Attempts have been made by authors of those chapters to address these issues at [http://nobility.pro/ nobility.pro], but, unfortunately, it is not yet a sufficiently well-structured source and no printed version is available. --[[User:Kober|Kober]]<sup>[[User talk:Kober|Talk]]</sup> 15:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Stop distorting Georgian History. == |
|||
Eristavi had name - Zurab, if Qizilbashes called him Sohrab it means nothing. This is English Wikipedia, not Persian. Furthermore, you can not call Teimuraz I - Tahmuraz, he never converted to Islam, neither did Baadur Eristavi. The latter, even never visited Iran.--[[User:Giorgi Mechurchle|Giorgi Mechurchle]] ([[User talk:Giorgi Mechurchle|talk]]) 22:54, 14 May 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:54, 14 May 2022
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Date of death
@Kober:, hi, thanks first of all for the additions. The date of death initially included by me was 1630 as well. I based this on Mikaberidze (2015) Historical Dictionary of Georgia, p. 133. However, according to Allen, W.E.D. (1964). "Trivia Historiae Ibericae". In Salia, Kalistrat. Bedi Kartlisa, Revue de Kartvélologie. XVII-XVIII. Paris., p. 168, he "died in 1629". Given that Mikaberidze (2015) doesn't really focus too much on that part while Allen (1964) does a bit more, I then decided to use 1629 instead of 1630. Your thoughts on which of the two we should use in articles for the future? - LouisAragon (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Well, I do understand that. The sources are not anonymous on the date of Zurab's death. So, probably we should use both, but more recent sources such as Дворянские роды Росс. Империи том 4 do give preponderance to 1630.--KoberTalk 04:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Kober:, hmmm I see. Well, if the newer sources seem to stick to the year 1630, then I guess we should probably stick to that as well. Just in case; are there any noteworthy number of reliable sources that you know of that mention 1629? - LouisAragon (talk) 02:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, and thanks for linking that source. Looks good! Just got myself an online readable version of it as we speak. ;-) - LouisAragon (talk) 02:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- Good! Well, the book, as any other source, is not immune to inaccuracies and inconsistencies, but, by far, it is the most comprehensive and up-to-date genealogical study of the Georgian nobility. Attempts have been made by authors of those chapters to address these issues at nobility.pro, but, unfortunately, it is not yet a sufficiently well-structured source and no printed version is available. --KoberTalk 15:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, and thanks for linking that source. Looks good! Just got myself an online readable version of it as we speak. ;-) - LouisAragon (talk) 02:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Kober:, hmmm I see. Well, if the newer sources seem to stick to the year 1630, then I guess we should probably stick to that as well. Just in case; are there any noteworthy number of reliable sources that you know of that mention 1629? - LouisAragon (talk) 02:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Stop distorting Georgian History.
Eristavi had name - Zurab, if Qizilbashes called him Sohrab it means nothing. This is English Wikipedia, not Persian. Furthermore, you can not call Teimuraz I - Tahmuraz, he never converted to Islam, neither did Baadur Eristavi. The latter, even never visited Iran.--Giorgi Mechurchle (talk) 22:54, 14 May 2022 (UTC)