User talk:DareshMohan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:51, 9 July 2022

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

Your submission at Articles for creation: Veedekkadi Mogudandi? has been accepted

Veedekkadi Mogudandi?, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Numberguy6 (talk) 17:18, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Offline sources

In the event that I retire, here are all the offline sources collected by me you can use to expand articles. Also notifying Srivin. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:46, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with your future endeavors. Remember there is life outside Wikipedia. DareshMohan (talk) 05:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks bro however the link is asking for access. Srivin (talk) 13:21, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Try now. Here is the updated link. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks bro. Srivin (talk) 12:57, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thirupathi (2006 Kannada film) (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I recommend you to see film, before submitting it again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thirupathi (2006 Kannada film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thirupathi (2006 Kannada film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 03:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 03:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nenu Pelliki Ready has been accepted

Nenu Pelliki Ready, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 10:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:RmKV

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:RmKV, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RmKV (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RmKV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:RmKV, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaduthu Paaduthu has been accepted

Aaduthu Paaduthu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thirupathi (2006 Kannada film) has been accepted

Thirupathi (2006 Kannada film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 07:41, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohan Juneja (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DaxServer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohan Juneja and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mohan Juneja, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:AK61

Could you please add more sources before I take it to mainspace? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure bro. DareshMohan (talk) 05:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it has a notable production, yet — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is because no matter how big a star Ajith be and no matter how high-profile his film be with equally high media coverage, non-American films are, from Wikipedia's perspective, unworthy for the mainspace until their filming is notable. The high-profile Vikram Vedha was a victim of WP:NFF, but Thalapathy 66 isn't. That is why we won't move AK61 to the mainspace until there are more sources on filming. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:26, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you're moving right away. I've added Thalapathy 66 to Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force/Future films, so you can also add films there if you wanna track them — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michael

Sure about this? The poster typically mentions the original language first, eg. Kannada for KGF; Telugu for Radhe Shyam, Hindi for Adipurush, Tamil for Valimai etc. In this case, even the Tamil poster Michael mentions Telugu first -- Ab207 (talk) 08:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nice research. Let's keep it in the table as Telugu for now. This is confusing because this source says that Michael, which is being made in Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, and Hindi. Possible that this film is a Tamil-Telugu bilingual. The actors are promoting Tamil version. See Vijay Sethupathi's tweet here. DareshMohan (talk) 08:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They'll probably resort to the age old trick of filming the actors in whichever language they are comfortable with. It will be pushed as a bilingual if they have enough footage in both languages -- Ab207 (talk) 12:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ab207: Do you think that trick will be used in Thalapathy 66? There are many Telugu actors (Jayasudha and Srikanth, who hasn't acted in Tamil before). DareshMohan (talk) 03:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to guess, depends a lot on actor's dedication. Ajay Devgn did a terrible job in mouthing his Telugu dialogues in RRR while Alia was better. I expected to it to be reverse when that casting was announced -- Ab207 (talk) 06:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Upacharapoorvam Gunda Jayan has been accepted

Upacharapoorvam Gunda Jayan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kalki's reviews

While I thank you for assigning me with those tasks (and don't stop), I also will need your help at places. You may start by expanding Kalki's reviews added by me. Though they are predomiantly pre-2000, will you be fine with it? I'll list periodically by bullet points, you strike out each once done. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe some time in the future. You should make a list of under sourced films because they get PROd'd / AfD. DareshMohan (talk) 00:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DIRECTOR column on AR RAHMAN's discography

On any international film composer's Wikipedia film discography, there is a 'director' column. This has been an international standard for ages, on Wikipedia. Nobody can make an arbitrary decision and call it 'unneeded'. Please do some homework before resorting to such edits. Do check these discgraphies: - Hans Zimmer discography, Thomas Newman discography, Ennio Morricone discography, Howard Shore discography. DilliKaShehzaada (talk) 10:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shree (2006 film) (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shree (2006 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shree (2006 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 01:11, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aadi Lakshmi has been accepted

Aadi Lakshmi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 08:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, DareshMohan

Thank you for creating The Gambler (2019 film).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:40, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, DareshMohan

Thank you for creating White Rainbow (film).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Palani Bharathi

Could you please do something about this? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. YouTube videos don't seem notable. Maybe include newspaper interviews. DareshMohan (talk) 05:12, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shatruvu (2013 film) has been accepted

Shatruvu (2013 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malligadu Marriage Bureau has been accepted

Malligadu Marriage Bureau, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RDX Love has been accepted

RDX Love, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayana (film) has been accepted

Ayana (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Owlf 📪 11:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evvarikee Cheppoddu has been accepted

Evvarikee Cheppoddu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Owlf 📪 11:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alias Janaki (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

May be notable but I didn't found great significant coverage except two references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alias Janaki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alias Janaki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 11:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SIIMA Award for Best Actor – Telugu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 100% Love.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Appavum Veenjum has been accepted

Appavum Veenjum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Okato Number Kurraadu has been accepted

Okato Number Kurraadu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thoppi has been accepted

Thoppi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Film series

Dude, Daresh Mohan. Three films are only supposed to be considered as a series. That’s what I have noted from pages like Singam (film series), Aranmanai (film series) and Pizza (film series). Pizza’s 1 st series and Pizza 2 were released and Pizza 3 is not yet filming although it’s announced. Theoder2055 (talk) 06:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I 100% agree with you bro. DareshMohan (talk) 06:35, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alias Janaki has been accepted

Alias Janaki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 23:33, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prince (upcoming film)

@DareshMohan: you have any idea about the date in which Sivakarthikeyan’s bilingual film will start filming? Has it already started filming? Theoder2055 (talk) 05:29, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No idea sorry (but probably already started)

Ya, that’s what @Ab207: told it has started its regular shoot on Feb 2022. Theoder2055 (talk) 08:00, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sravanamasam has been accepted

Sravanamasam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DIVINE 📪 20:07, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Semmanur has been accepted

Semmanur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DIVINE 📪 20:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aranmanai Siruvayal has been accepted

Aranmanai Siruvayal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DIVINE 📪 20:34, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sakshi Excellence Awards

There is no article on this award. So I've created Draft:Sakshi Excellence Awards. Can you expand it? — Rosyyyy (talk) 16:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Postcard (2014 film) has been accepted

Postcard (2014 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manasu Paddanu Kaani (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi. Sorry to write this, but, the sources are terrible. Aren't there any reviews or writings about this TV show in reliable secondary sources - more prominent news outlets, etc?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manasu Paddanu Kaani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Manasu Paddanu Kaani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 16:08, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dear Friend (2022 film) has been accepted

Dear Friend (2022 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 08:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taj Mahal (2010 film) has been accepted

Taj Mahal (2010 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 12:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandhithathum Sindhithathum (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandhithathum Sindhithathum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sandhithathum Sindhithathum, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 16:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubts

Hi, I have a doubt regarding Vikram (2022 film), there were promotional events being held in Kerala to promote the film. Aren’t they promoting for the dubbed Malayalam version for the film? Kerala audiences are also fine watching the Tamil version itself right? 2001:8F8:1825:E782:6CE1:80AD:123:7CB3 (talk) 06:43, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I too had the same doubt. So there is a dubbed Malayalam version? DareshMohan (talk) 07:30, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But the trailer of the film was not released in Malayalam. Then how they promoted the film in Kerala?

Vikram has dubbed for five languages in Ponniyin Selvan: I right?2001:8F8:1825:E782:6CE1:80AD:123:7CB3 (talk) 19:49, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 536: / Line 536: @@
 Hi, I have a doubt regarding [[Vikram (2022 film)]], there were promotional events being held in Kerala to promote the film. Aren’t they promoting for the dubbed Malayalam version for the film? Kerala audiences are also fine watching the Tamil version itself right? [[Special:Contributions/2001:8F8:1825:E782:6CE1:80AD:123:7CB3|2001:8F8:1825:E782:6CE1:80AD:123:7CB3]] ([[User talk:2001:8F8:1825:E782:6CE1:80AD:123:7CB3|talk]]) 06:43, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 :Hi, I too had the same doubt. So there is a dubbed Malayalam version? [[User:DareshMohan|DareshMohan]] ([[User talk:DareshMohan#top|talk]]) 07:30, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
-But the trailer of the film was not released in Malayalam. Then how they promoted the film in Kerala? Also Vikram has dubbed for five languages in [[:Ponniyin Selvan: I]]
+But the trailer of the film was not released in Malayalam. Then how they promoted the film in Kerala?
-right?
- [[Special:Contributions/2001:8F8:1825:E782:6CE1:80AD:123:7CB3|2001:8F8:1825:E782:6CE1:80AD:123:7CB3]] ([[User talk:2001:8F8:1825:E782:6CE1:80AD:123:7CB3|talk]]) 19:49, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
+Vikram has dubbed for five languages in [[:Ponniyin Selvan: I]] right?[[Special:Contributions/2001:8F8:1825:E782:6CE1:80AD:123:7CB3|2001:8F8:1825:E782:6CE1:80AD:123:7CB3]] ([[User talk:2001:8F8:1825:E782:6CE1:80AD:123:7CB3|talk]]) 19:49, 9 July 2022 (UTC)