User talk:Boca Jóvenes

There are a lot of us who just want to work on articles.

Some wise words I saw on a discussion page, written by one of our lady editors.
I won't name her and possibly embarrass her, but she is right.
Working on articles is rewarding. Going round in circles is not.
So, unless you ask me a direct question or you need my help with a specific article, this editor is boycotting all discussions.
Nothing personal, but silence is golden.

---

Welcome!

Hello, Boca Jóvenes! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Ueutyi Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

1774 English cricket season edits

Hello there,

I see that you reverted my edit to 1774 English cricket season. If the page was correct before, does it still need copyediting and is it still in use? If not, I will remove the associated templates.

Thank you. ContributeToTheWiki (talk) 14:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, yourself. Hope you are okay. The templates can be removed now although I'll still be working on the article, mainly to convert the table into narrative. Thanks for your help and all the best. BcJvs UTC 14:47, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Boca Jóvenes!

Happy New Year!

Boca Jóvenes,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 12:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 12:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Abishe. That's really kind. We just settled for a quiet drink or two (or three) at midnight but it was very enjoyable. Let's see what 2023 brings. I hope you had a good New Year yourself and I wish you all the best in 2023. Thanks again. BcJvs UTC 12:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:No Great Shaker per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BlackJack. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 13:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Boca Jóvenes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Girth Summit, your message says the account "has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse". Please show me when, where and how this account has been used abusively. I would say it has been used constructively for the creation of several good articles, rescuing many other articles which needed repair, etc., etc. Can you really afford to lose editors who perform 12k edits with results like those? BcJvs UTC 13:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=[[User:Girth Summit|Girth Summit]], your message says the account "has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse". Please show me when, where and how this account has been used abusively. I would say it has been used constructively for the creation of several [[WP:GA|good articles]], rescuing many other articles which needed repair, etc., etc. Can you really afford to lose editors who perform 12k edits with results like those? [[User:Boca Jóvenes|<span style="color:blue"><b><i>Bc</i></b></span>]][[User talk:Boca Jóvenes|<span style="color:red"><b><i>Jvs</i></b></span>]] UTC 13:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:Girth Summit|Girth Summit]], your message says the account "has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse". Please show me when, where and how this account has been used abusively. I would say it has been used constructively for the creation of several [[WP:GA|good articles]], rescuing many other articles which needed repair, etc., etc. Can you really afford to lose editors who perform 12k edits with results like those? [[User:Boca Jóvenes|<span style="color:blue"><b><i>Bc</i></b></span>]][[User talk:Boca Jóvenes|<span style="color:red"><b><i>Jvs</i></b></span>]] UTC 13:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:Girth Summit|Girth Summit]], your message says the account "has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse". Please show me when, where and how this account has been used abusively. I would say it has been used constructively for the creation of several [[WP:GA|good articles]], rescuing many other articles which needed repair, etc., etc. Can you really afford to lose editors who perform 12k edits with results like those? [[User:Boca Jóvenes|<span style="color:blue"><b><i>Bc</i></b></span>]][[User talk:Boca Jóvenes|<span style="color:red"><b><i>Jvs</i></b></span>]] UTC 13:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}