Talk:Frangula californica: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:08, 13 February 2023

Plants Start‑class Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Start‑class Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edibility

The berries are not edible. I just spent the afternoon vomiting repeatedly after consuming approximately a half-dozen ripe F. californica berries. F. Pacifica 05:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fpacifica (talk • contribs)

Historical ethnobotanical knowledge and current wild food literature provides a record for the use of these berries and their seeds as choice foodstuffs by tribes of California (as opposed to the bark and leaves which were used as emetic). The original research of one profileless wikipedia editor whose plant identification skills and ethnobotanical background are unknowable does not convincingly fly in the face of these secondary sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.16.255.253 (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BS F. Pacifica 22:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:50, 13 February 2023 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,549,277 edits m Signing comment by 199.16.255.253 - "WP:NOR" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:08, 13 February 2023 edit undo Fpacifica (talk \| contribs) 87 edits →‎Edibility: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Historical ethnobotanical knowledge and current wild food literature provides a record for the use of these berries and their seeds as choice foodstuffs by tribes of California (as opposed to the bark and leaves which were used as emetic). The original research of one profileless wikipedia editor whose plant identification skills and ethnobotanical background are unknowable does not convincingly fly in the face of these secondary sources. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/199.16.255.253\|199.16.255.253]] ([[User talk:199.16.255.253#top\|talk]]) 21:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		Historical ethnobotanical knowledge and current wild food literature provides a record for the use of these berries and their seeds as choice foodstuffs by tribes of California (as opposed to the bark and leaves which were used as emetic). The original research of one profileless wikipedia editor whose plant identification skills and ethnobotanical background are unknowable does not convincingly fly in the face of these secondary sources. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/199.16.255.253\|199.16.255.253]] ([[User talk:199.16.255.253#top\|talk]]) 21:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			:BS F. Pacifica 22:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)