Jump to content

User talk:Soupvector: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 70: Line 70:


:After creating the draft and seeing the notice that AfC review might take months - and before your deletion appeared - I copied the article's content into article space because I thought the refs did establish notability. Apologies if this (my good faith copy-paste prior to seeing your decision) generates confusion but a professor, department chair, and past president of a national professional organization seems notable. — [[User:soupvector|soupvector]] ([[User_talk:soupvector|talk]]) 21:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
:After creating the draft and seeing the notice that AfC review might take months - and before your deletion appeared - I copied the article's content into article space because I thought the refs did establish notability. Apologies if this (my good faith copy-paste prior to seeing your decision) generates confusion but a professor, department chair, and past president of a national professional organization seems notable. — [[User:soupvector|soupvector]] ([[User_talk:soupvector|talk]]) 21:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
::Not sure what to do now with the article space version - hoping that after consideration you or others seeing this might recognize the notability. My motivation for the creation of the article is that she was on a listing associated with the Women in Red effort to represent notable women scientists on WP. — [[User:soupvector|soupvector]] ([[User_talk:soupvector|talk]]) 21:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"

Revision as of 21:45, 3 March 2023


Rockefeller University help?

Hello, Soupvector! I work at Rockefeller University and I am looking to add an update to the university's Wikipedia article. I made a request at Talk:Rockefeller University that essentially turns a list of discoveries into a narrative and adds sources. Since you have edited the article previously I thought I'd reach out to see if you could review my request. I will not edit the article myself because of my conflict of interest. Thanks! KFenzRockefeller (talk) 19:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Medicine Newsletter - August 2022

Issue 18—August 2022


WikiProject Medicine Newsletter

Back (for now) by popular demand, it's the WP:MED Newsletter! Pardon the 9-month hiatus. This month features a catch-up list of promoted GAs since the last newsletter, and some calls to action for those looking to add to their todo lists. I hope this finds you well. Enjoy.

Newly recognized content

Since last newsletter (Nov. 1, 2021)
Osteogenesis imperfecta nom. Psiĥedelisto, reviewed by Vaticidalprophet
Tietze syndrome nom. TheRibinator, reviewed by Sennalen
Coughs and sneezes spread diseases nom. AFreshStart, reviewed by No Great Shaker
William Heath Byford nom. Delqa, reviewed by Ajpolino
Henri Coutard nom. DanCherek, reviewed by Amitchell125
Riboflavin nom. David notMD, reviewed by Mertbiol
Vitamin A nom. David notMD, reviewed by Hughesdarren

Nominated for review

Thiamine nom. David notMD
Sesame allergy nom. David notMD







WP:MED News

  • Since last newsletter, frightfully few medicine articles have passed through our main content review processes, Good Article and Featured Article. While we can agree there's more to editing than chasing bronze stars and green blobs, it would be nice to see the catalog of "Good" and "Featured" medicine articles growing rather than just aging. If you're interested in taking on a project but would like some light guidance or a helping hand, feel free to post your plans at WT:MED and you may find others willing to join.
  • An ongoing effort seeks to review/update our oldest featured articles. Major depressive disorder, Lung cancer, and Schizophrenia are next on the chopping block (so to speak). If you're interested in helping to update any, please post at WT:MED or at those articles' talk pages. If you're new to the FA process, I'd encourage you to enlist the help of someone(s) who has been through the process before, as they can help clarify expectations and save you time.
  • Got a minute? Running low on inspiration/motivation and need a simple task? Check out the 247 medicine articles tagged as citing no sources!

News from around the site

  • The Reading/Web team has rolled out a new skin called "Vector 2022" that will soon become the default. Opt-in in your Preferences to try it out. As with any visual update, it'll take some getting used to. If you hate it, don't panic; once it becomes default you'll still be able to opt-out in your Preferences.
  • The folks who brought us the nifty "Reply" button have now rolled out a "Subscribe" button to be notified of comments in a particular thread. I believe it's turned on for everyone now. Try it on a busy talk page (e.g. WT:MED).
  • Voting is open for the community nominees to the WMF Board of Trustees, until September 6th.

Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.

You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Ajpolino (talk) 21:28, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Medicine Newsletter - October 2022

Issue 19—October 2022


WikiProject Medicine Newsletter

Hello all. A short newsletter reflecting a quiet month in recognized content. If there's other types of content you'd like to see in the newsletter feel free to post suggestions here. Otherwise, here's your update for the month:

Newly recognized content

Sesame allergy nom. David notMD, reviewed by Nolabob



Nominated for review

Thiamine nom. David notMD, under review by Mertbiol
Blood donation in India nom. Blood donation in India, under review by Larry Hockett
COVID-19 pandemic nom. Ozzie10aaaa
Cold medicine nom. That Coptic Guy

WP:MED News

  • No news, which may be good news. Happy editing.

Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.

You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Ajpolino (talk) 03:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you!

The Pharmacology Barnstar
Thanks for expanding Pirtobrutinib! NickCT (talk) 17:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katherine L. Knight (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Pbritti (talk) 21:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
After creating the draft and seeing the notice that AfC review might take months - and before your deletion appeared - I copied the article's content into article space because I thought the refs did establish notability. Apologies if this (my good faith copy-paste prior to seeing your decision) generates confusion but a professor, department chair, and past president of a national professional organization seems notable. — soupvector (talk) 21:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what to do now with the article space version - hoping that after consideration you or others seeing this might recognize the notability. My motivation for the creation of the article is that she was on a listing associated with the Women in Red effort to represent notable women scientists on WP. — soupvector (talk) 21:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Soupvector! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 21:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]