User talk:HitroMilanese

Strawberries of gratitude! Thank you for reviewing and approving my page for the Jack White song "Taking Me Back"! It was my first time ever making a brand new Wikipedia page, so I really appreciate it being approved. Thanks again and have a nice day! Victorvictorww (talk) 22:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC) Asking for your opinion Hello, @HitroMilanese, may I ask for a favor? Can you please see Draft:Overload (EP)? May I ask for your opinion about the mentioned draft? Thanks! - jampol 02:46, 23 November 2022 (UTC) @Jpmagabo9 Hello there, it appears that the draft has been already moved to mainspace. It appears notable though. Regards Hitro talk 11:01, 27 November 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC) asking for your suggestions Hello, @HitroMilanese, May I ask for your opinion about the Draft:psychologs? Thanks! Gauravdelhi.wiki (talk) 12:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC) @Gauravdelhi.wiki Hello there, For acceptance of this draft you need to demonstrate notability. Please point out top three sources where this topic has received significant coverage. The sources must be reliable and independent of the subject. You may list those sources on the talk page of the draft. Reviewers will consider those sources before taking any decision. Please let me know when you do so. Regards. Hitro talk 05:57, 30 November 2022 (UTC) @HitroMilanese Thank you for for time and opinion. I have added top three resources on talk page of Draft:psychologs. Kindly review. Thanks! Gauravdelhi.wiki (talk) 07:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC) Blocking of the Subject of Concert musicians Why did HitroMilanese block an article of a legit musician with standing? Musiceditorguild (talk) 16:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC) @Musiceditorguild Hello there, If you are referring to Draft:Congyu Wang then please check my comment on the submission. Regards. Hitro talk 05:59, 30 November 2022 (UTC) Where is the comment? There are sufficient verified sources on national news agencies that published numerous articles about this artist. Is there a way you can unblock this submission? We are trying to re-edit and cite this article Musiceditorguild (talk) 09:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC) @Musiceditorguild Comment is just below the decline notice. The time when I declined the draft it appeared like this. There is nothing like blocking or unblocking of the submission. Anyone is free to edit the draft and submit it for review. At present, the draft is already submitted for review and sooner or later any reviewer will review it. Apart from that, it appears that you have a "Conflict of Interest" with the subject. Who are "we"? Are you a group of editors trying to publish this article? Before making further edits see WP:ROLE as well as WP:CONFLICT and disclose your association with the subject as per Wikipedia guidelines. I have left elaborated notice about COI editing on your talk page too. Regards. Hitro talk 10:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC) Thank you! We haven no relation with any specific artists. I am writing from a foundation based in France. Where can we prove our identity on wikipedia? 154.67.92.212 (talk) 02:33, 1 December 2022 (UTC) Declining a biography page Hi HitroMilanese, I seek your help is understanding the reasons behind the rejection of the draft Ashwani Kr Sharma (Draft:Ashwani Kr Sharma) and how can I improve it to get it approved. Bejaay (talk) 07:12, 1 December 2022 (UTC) @Bejaay Hello there, I am not able to determine why the topic is notable. I suggest you to check WP:CCS and demonstrate that the topic is worthy of inclusion. Please introduce references where the subject has received significant coverage. Also see WP:RS and WP:GNG for more information. Regards. Hitro talk 05:10, 2 December 2022 (UTC) delete the speedy deletion box Please delete the speedy deletion box from this page: and let the admin decide to be kept or be deleted and I am sure they will accept it, but this speedy deletion box should not be there Thanks in advance 151.83.11.177 (talk) 14:44, 11 December 2022 (UTC) The Real Jane Austen Hey, thanks for dropping the note on my talk page. I noticed your account is as old as mine, the only difference is that I rarely edit Wikipedia. I was into helping wiki's a decade ago, but now the process just feels bafflingly complex. But when I was watching through all of Jane Austen adaptations, and finished with her dramatized biographies, I almost missed The Real Jane Austen because it doesn't have a Wikipedia page! I thought, that's a tragedy; it was a really well done biography. And it's very notable, being one of only three dramas about Austen's life. It's got decent actors and everything! So I spent like an hour or two creating a page that seemed like a good start, only to have it semi-deleted because it didn't have sources. So I tried again, adding two sources. I don't know what else I can do, but this process is not friendly towards the uninitiated, it feels like you have to be "in the club" to create a page, and I have no desire to invest the time to join. I just created the page as a public service. Can you just tell me what else I need to do to get it to stay? Or just do it? I feel like it will take me several more hours to figure out what I need to do, whereas a pro can have it done in ten minutes. This whole process has just pushed me away from ever wanting to contribute to Wikipedia, not pulled me further in. Thanks, Thunderbird L17 (talk) 06:46, 13 December 2022 (UTC) (Hopefully the ~ signature thing still works) @Thunderbird L17 Hello, Thank you for your message. I do agree that you have put in lots of effort while creating this draft but it is still missing one of the main aspect of a Wikipedia article i.e. referencing. Unless notability is asserted with help of external reliable sources, the drafts will not be accepted. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (films). Demonstration of notability is the priority. I will do some research via Google Books and look out for the sources later. If you can add some reviews about the film then it will certainly help. Regards. Hitro talk 05:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC) Thank you, I would greatly appreciate any assistance you have to offer. The Jane Austen in popular culture page set me off on my quest to watch every English adaptation. The page is very comprehensive, and I know the "what about X" argument is frowned upon, but it's a little frustrating that every other available English Jane Austen period adaptation has it's own page, with this singular exception. Especially since some of them have the exact same "notability" issues. This adaptation really is a gem, and deserves the publicity of a Wikipedia page so people know just what they're missing out on. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to assist. I've found a few reviews since, but mainly on blog pages since this has flown under the radar a little. And every review I have found has been positive. Thunderbird L17 (talk) 05:49, 15 December 2022 (UTC) I've added even more references, cleaned them up, and resubmitted. Maybe 10 references will be enough? Thunderbird L17 (talk) 17:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC) @Thunderbird L17 Hello there, I did extensive research but could not find anything substantial. A published review would have been very helpful. I see you have added some sources, I guess I will leave this for a fresh pair of eyes. Regards. Hitro talk 06:28, 21 December 2022 (UTC) Thanks for trying. I get what they're trying to do to keep "unimportant pages" from appearing, but trying to make it such a rigid policy just makes the end results inconsistent. It can exclude reasonable articles such as this one, and include far less notable but slightly better advertised films. Oh well. I'll just keep trying, and hopefully eventually somebody will approve it. Thunderbird L17 (talk) 20:27, 23 December 2022 (UTC) OCS 1 Oh Sees are a huge band: Osees Their first record should have a Wikipedia page, and if you look at their Wiki page it is the ONLY release without one: Osees#Discography WhipItGoodRealGood (talk) 06:06, 15 December 2022 (UTC) Seems like a bands first record should be included since it's their first record. That's kind of a major thing for a band that ultimately becomes as popular and culturally important. The Guardian is a good enough source? WhipItGoodRealGood (talk) 06:07, 15 December 2022 (UTC) @WhipItGoodRealGood Hello there, The version of the draft that I declined did not contain any reference to The Guardian, to be honest it was unreferenced and appeared like a test edit. Anyhow, in order to demonstrate notability you need to fulfill criteria listed in WP:NALBUM. Please add some album reviews and resubmit. Secondly, I do not see any purpose of the track listing where there is no song name. I'll recommend you to remove it. Regards. Hitro talk 10:43, 16 December 2022 (UTC) Eren Efe Erkan Hello, I'm Yasir. I opened two topics named Eren Efe Erkan and Joyce Teknoloji, but both were rejected. I read about individuals and businesses. this person, Eren Efe Erkan, produced an electric vehicle that was the first in Turkey. There are 2, 3 other types of vehicles in his projects and he presents them in newspapers and in the fairs. According to the rules of people notability, this man has both invented something new. It has been awarded by the state and exhibited both at one major technology fair. Joyce Teknoloji or Eren Efe Erkan find it useful to open at least one page on wikipedia; because it's a new generation business and it's helpful to have it here so people can easily access information when they're wondering who this guy is. Also, everyone can do research and make impartial arrangements so that we write the truth. but its rejection is unfair, it is a subject that thousands of people wonder about, you can search 'Eren Efe Erkan' on google or 'Joyce Teknoloji' I would like to remind you again about the qualifications I have read on wikipedia. Kind regards. creative professions Scientists, faculty, economists, professors, writers, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers and other creative professionals. The person is considered an important personality or is often referred to by colleagues or successors. A person is recognized for developing a new concept, theory, or technique. The person has created or played an important role in the creation of an important or well-known work with or in partnership with others, that work has been the subject of a standalone book or feature film, or more than one magazine article. The person's work is either (a) presented in a major exhibition or a monument to it, or (b) has received significant critical attention from critics, or (c) is in the permanent collection of an important (non-local) museum or gallery. Yasirazeri (talk) 15:14, 15 December 2022 (UTC) @Yasirazeri Hello there, Thank you for your message. Your draft has been declined solely for one reason i.e. it is not written in English language. You were informed about this in the past too. Please click on the link below to access Turkish Wikipedia. Turkish Wikipedia You can submit your article in Turkish language there. If you want to create article or draft on English Wikipedia then you have to use only English language. Regards. Hitro talk 10:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC) Beauty and the Beast musical and other draft reviews Could you review the Draft:Beauty and the Beast (Original Broadway Cast Recording) 223.178.87.188 (talk) 11:20, 19 December 2022 (UTC) Also could you review Draft:Steven Universe soundtracks, Draft:Cha Cha Real Smooth (EP) and Draft:The Banshees of Inisherin (score) 223.178.87.188 (talk) 12:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC) related to draft cancellation hey, can i know the exact why my draft was declined . and how can i prove my work from "reliable sources" Rudraagrawal17 (talk) 15:21, 19 December 2022 (UTC) @Rudraagrawal17 Hello there, Please see WP:YFA. Additionally, your draft is unsourced. Unless references from independent and reliable sources are added, drafts will not be accepted. Regards. Hitro talk 06:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC) Draft was declined hey, can i know the exact why my draft was declined Prof(Dr)K.P.Yadav (talk) 07:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC) @Prof(Dr)K.P.Yadav Hello there, Please see WP:YFA. This draft is not at all ready for the mainspace. Secondly, it appears that you are trying to write about yourself or you have a conflict of interest with the subject. Please see WP:COI before editing further and make necessary disclosures. Regards. Hitro talk 06:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC) What Kinda Music draft Hey, thanks for approving my draft for Time (Louis Cole album)! I made another page shortly after that for a similar album, Draft:What Kinda Music. I was going to move it to mainspace myself, but there was a conflict with the existing redirect for What Kinda Music so I added it to A4C instead. Since I'm pretty sure the article is in good shape, would you possibly be able to help resolve the redirect conflict (and/or point me toward what needs to be done in cases like this)? Thanks, and Merry Christmas! BanjoZebra (talk) 19:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC) NPP Award for 2022 The New Page Patroller's Barnstar For over 100 article reviews during 2022. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC) New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023 Hello HitroMilanese, New Page Review queue December 2022 Backlog The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day. 2022 Awards Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone! Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.) New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD. Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see. Reminders Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter. There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord. Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist. If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Deletion of Page KızBaşına (Just A Girl) and ore Feedback on The Page Hi! I hope you are doing well. First of all thank you for your feedback and time to assess my page KızBaşına (Just A Girl). KızBaşına was a NGO which is found by my instructor in Middle East Technical University. Their aim is to raise awareness on women rights and against violence against women. They started as 5 people and now, they touched over thousands of women's life directly and many more indirectly. They saved hundreds of women from constant violence, informed huge crowds on birth control, women health and and other areas that touches women's life in Turkey. They did (also are doing) this for no money or popularity. KızBaşına is a significant and important NGO in Turkey. Their huge impact deserves a remark like a Wikipedia page. I decided to create this page because their impact is huge and this can be proven by numbers. Moreover, such NGOs paly really imporntat roles in Turkey, since my country has lack of awareness on the area. On the other hand, my feedback from you is "this page is created for teasing". Can you be more specific? What are the points that you noticed and classified this page as "an advertisement"? I would like to revise those points and resubmit for your review (or another superior writer on Wiki). I am looking for your more detailed comments not only for this page but also my further contributions on Wikipedia. They will be very valuable for me. Thank you for your future feedbacks and time. Best regards. Omerfarukfender (talk) 18:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Ernest Singer citations Hello. You mentioned that this page doesn't have many inline citations. Actually, as I mentioned on the talk page, everything in the article has inline citations but I hid most of them for the AfC review. Only the articles relating to notability are showing, but the others can be viewed in the source editor and could be easily restored. A Wikipedia essay recommended this to aid in notbility reviews so the reviewer doesn't have to look at tons of unrelated articles. Anyway, this article fails notability and I will not submit it again. I just though I would let you know what I was doing. I will unhide my citations and resubmit. Thanks. BruceThomson (talk) 01:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC) important news websites for GCC and Middle East User:HitroMilanese hey i am building the list of news websites for GCC and Middle East. kindly guide. Aryaanmalik516 (talk) 05:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC) @Aryaanmalik516 I responded on your talkpage. Regards. Hitro talk 05:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC) @HitroMilanese kindly review my article now. its title has been also changed. Aryaanmalik516 (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC) Original sources Sir, it is an original source. Why are you saying that it's not a reliable source? Could you please tell me how to publish this article using the same source Definepedia (talk) 07:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC) Draft declined Hello Hitro, I edited the article and put all necessary citations of the person mentioned in the biography. Two of the links include reliable resources, which are local news websites. Imran Attari is a popular figure in pakistan and is known for his religious speeches. He has also signicant presence on Youtube but I didn't find suitable to attach Youtube links in the article. I request you to please re-check the two websites mentioned, also, do let me know on what points I should precisely work on to make the article authentic. Thanks Sarshaqarif (talk) 07:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC) Larry Garza There are multiple mentions of Larry across various news sources over the past decade. Maybe I am just doing a bad job of conveying this ? I see people like Mario Vitti, Muhammad Jawadullah, and Aminatta N'gum with 2 references getting approved. He is, without question, more famous than those people. 98.177.115.246 (talk) 03:33, 17 February 2023 (UTC) Hey there are various reliable sources when you publish Kayze, why was the page declined ? https://provemagazine.com/kayze-something-fresh-amidst-a-sea-of-generics/ https://thecloutmagazine.com/picture-perfect-blowing-up-on-tiktok-and-spotify/ https://maxedhiphop.com/kayze-drops-hit-with-choosy/ https://www.thehypemagazine.com/2023/02/kayzes-track-choosy-has-the-harshest-critics-buzzing/ https://ventsmagazine.com/2023/02/08/kayzes-issa-vibe-breaks-indie-records-with-over-500000-streams/ https://hiphop-paradise.com/kayzes-picture-perfect-is-a-masterpiece/ https://topmusicreviews.info/kayze-bright-lights-official-music-video-in-youtube/ Ssjdragonkai (talk) 18:41, 17 February 2023 (UTC) @Ssjdragonkai Hi, Add these reference to the draft and resubmit for review. These references appear WP:SPONSORED to me. I guess a fresh pair of eyes will analyze them better. Regards. Hitro talk 06:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC) Hi User: HitroMilanese I have written and edited this draft about a New York artist, "David Gonzalez" who is a bit difficult to classify (musician, poet, actor, teacher ....?) I have found references from independent sources of great relevance such as the New York Times, Washington Post and other news. I have seen that you are on the AfC participant list, and you have specialized in music. I ask you the great favor if you can review this article, thank you very much. Together we all make a better Wikipedia Miskito89 (talk) 09:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC) Karen Poole Thank you for reviewing the draft so promptly. It took me hours to complete but you rejected it instantly. Anyhow, I want to update the current article and also want to remove information that are not properly sourced. Are you asking me to edit the main article instead of submitting the draft? Hauntruce (talk) 11:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC) @Hauntruce: Hello there, Your draft was declined not rejected. The sole reason is that the topic exists. You can edit the article in accordance to the guidelines. Please see WP:V and WP:RS and edit accordingly. Regards. Hitro talk 11:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC) Draft Updated I have updated the citations and text for this entry Draft:Tamlyn Currin quoting multiple sources this author has contributed to. For reference here is a wiki entry for a direct peer of Tamlyn Currin - Richard Hemming Many thanks BHC11 (talk) 18:26, 8 March 2023 (UTC) @BHC11 Hello there, In order to demonstrate notability you are required to present references where the subject has received significant coverage. The references authored by the subject are not going to help. Please see WP:GNG. Regards. Hitro talk 06:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC) Review Hello User:HitroMilanese, I'm create new draft named Draft:Sangramsingh Thakur please review it once. Thank You Rajmama (talk) 09:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC) @Rajmama Hello there, To be honest, I do not think the topic is meeting WP:NACTOR. The subject must have significant roles in notable films. Some of the films do appear notable but the artist does not seem to have significant roles. I will leave it for another reviewer. Regards. Hitro talk 06:44, 11 March 2023 (UTC) NFooty PRODs Hey @HitroMilanese. I noticed you added two PROD tags(1, 2) which referenced WP:NFOOTY. I wanted to mention that NFOOTY was removed as a result of WP:NSPORTS2022. The reason being that the participation based criteria was considered to not be a good indication of notability and that it was too low a bar to pass. The bar has been raised on articles that relate to soccer so if a page failed NFOOTY then it would most likely still be appropriate to nominate it for deletion. I just wanted to mention this not because I disagree with your PROD tags but because I'd appreciate it if someone let me know in the same situation. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC) @Hey man im josh Hello there, Thanks a lot for your message. I was not at all aware of this consensus. I really appreciate your taking time to inform me about this. I shall keep this in mind while dealing with such articles. Regards. Hitro talk 06:41, 11 March 2023 (UTC) You declined my wikipedia page i dont think it sounded like an advertisement and also i had given all the references and all the links Please review and approve UrFathermaybeblind (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)