User talk:Miskito89

WikiProject Ricky Martin invitation

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits to Ricky Martin articles. I thought you may be interested in joining
Wikipedia:WikiProject Ricky Martin

We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ricky Martin and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page!
Thank You.

آرمین هویدایی (talk) 23:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Miskito89! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:32, Friday, May 5, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Miskito89! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:06, Friday, May 5, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Miskito89! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:06, Friday, May 5, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Miskito89! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:07, Friday, May 5, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fernando Alfageme has been accepted

Fernando Alfageme, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Eddie891 (talk) 19:54, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Real Instituto Jovellanos

Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Miskito89, thanks for creating Real Instituto Jovellanos!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add some references to this useful article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Antonio Valero Vicente

Hi, I'm Ajpolino. Miskito89, thanks for creating Antonio Valero Vicente!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Much of the info in this article remains unreferenced. Please add references for where you got this remaining info.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ajpolino (talk) 22:09, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of the article "2019 in Spain" in English Wikipedia

Hello, Miskito89. Happy New Year to you! 2019 is coming soon. Can you creat the article "2019 in Spain" in English Wikipedia? Thanks a lot!
123.150.182.177
16:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Real Instituto Jovellanos

Hello, Miskito89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Real Instituto Jovellanos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Snowycats (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Miskito89,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Miskito89,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Miskito89,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Víctor Martín Pérez

Hello, Miskito89,

Thank you for creating Víctor Martín Pérez.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for this page. Some of the references do not admit notability; other references - especially interviews - are not admitted as notable sources. Please consider more references. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Víctor Martín Pérez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Víctor Martín Pérez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Víctor Martín Pérez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vexations (talk) 22:49, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Colorectal cancer, you may be blocked from editing. Zefr (talk) 13:57, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David Gonzalez (multi-disciplinary artist) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, David Gonzalez (multi-disciplinary artist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proa Comunicación moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Proa Comunicación. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and paid editing, submit through WP:AfC per Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure#Conflict of interest guideline. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BigBuy moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to BigBuy. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is paid editing, so should be submitted through WP:AFC per Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure#Conflict of interest guideline. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BigBuy (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Edward-Woodrow was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BigBuy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Edward-Woodrow (talk) 20:07, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Miskito89! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Edward-Woodrow (talk) 20:07, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

Hi! I've read your email, but don't really have anything to offer in reply. But please understand this: WP:PAID editors are strongly discouraged from direct editing of affected articles, but may propose improvements using {{request edit}} on the relevant talk-page; often that 'discouragement' takes the form of blanket reversion of any paid edit. Please update the disclosure on your user-page to specify exactly who is paying you in each case; this is a requirement under our Terms of Use. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your edits Justlettersandnumbers and for taking the trouble to read the article and correct it. I am trying to follow your instructions and have already made a requested edition on the IESE Business School talk page. Kind regards Miskito89 (talk) 09:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BigBuy (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BigBuy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 09:22, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proa Comunicación (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PK650 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Proa Comunicación and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PK650 (talk) 00:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Gonzalez (artist) (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at David Gonzalez (storyteller) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Gonzalez (artist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Miskito89. Thank you for your work on Alegrías (flamenco). User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:BigBuy

Hello, Miskito89. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BigBuy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David Gonzalez (artist)

Hello, Miskito89. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Gonzalez (artist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Miskito89. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:10, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Miskito89,

If you are being compensated for your work on Wikipedia or it is part of a job, you must disclose this fact according to Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Failure to do so could result in a loss of editing privileges. If you have questions about this, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:12, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have just come here after looking at Valerio de Sanctis de Ferrari and I would have to agree with Liz that there seems to be an element of paid contributions to your work. The subject of your biography miraculously had photos uploaded by a business association on the days preceding your creating the article, and photographs where there is a clear level of personal access. I don't believe in such coincidence. Please make a clear statement of any conflict of interest or paid editing that you have undertaken, and please do that prior to any further editing. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Further, I am requesting that you make any new articles in the Draft: namespace and have them taken through a review process before they are moved by the community into the main namespace. You are aware of that namespace and process as I can see it mentioned above on your talk page. It does not seem appropriate that articles by you are created as sandbox articles and moved by you to the main namespace without such a review. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:09, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, that may be too harsh. I will amend my request to that you should consider that new articles you create should be in the draft namespace especially where they could be considered not notable for this WP. Where there is no corresponding article at another language Wikipedia that you should take those to the Draft: namespace to remove concerns about conflict of interest editing. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz I'm a retired Spanish female journalist. I live in the countryside in the Valencian Community. I am fascinated by the Wikipedia project and for the last few years I have been collaborating as much as I can, making the Spanish reality visible. When I read a book that interests me, listen to or discover a new artist or a successful company, or find content in Spanish that is not on Wikipedia in English, I try to make a new article or translate it from Spanish. In my younger days I was an environmental journalist, but I have always liked politics and try to make certain corruption cases and their protagonists visible, and also when injustices are committed. I have nothing to do with Valerio Sanctis de Ferrari, I translated the article from the Spanish version. Last year, and when I was still working for the Spanish newspaper ABC, the deputy editor of my newspaper, who knows my fondness for Wikipedia, asked me to help with certain articles that were having problems. I advised them on what to do and tried to solve the problems, but there was never any direct relationship or payment for it. Now I live on my pension and I don't receive any payment from anyone or anything, so all my articles are voluntary, some I translate, some are original, but I always look for notoriety and references.

I know that Wikipedia is a very big and honourable project that requires the participation of many editors and researchers, and that it is a collective construction that is nourished by voluntary work. If there are any doubts about my latest contributions, I will request that the draft be deleted. I hope I have clarified your doubts, best regards Miskito89 (talk) 12:26, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Gonzalez (artist)

Hello, Miskito89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Gonzalez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:VASS (company)

Hello, Miskito89. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:VASS (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Neri moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jorge Neri. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]