Wikipedia talk:Protection policy: Difference between revisions
→Add reference to Isagarh in the list of forts and Ahir people.: rmv irrelevant |
Cjjjkscratch (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
As this page itself talks about protections, this page must be as protected as possible. It should have more than just semi-protection. [[User:Cjjjkscratch|Cjjjkscratch]] ([[User talk:Cjjjkscratch|talk]]) 06:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
As this page itself talks about protections, this page must be as protected as possible. It should have more than just semi-protection. [[User:Cjjjkscratch|Cjjjkscratch]] ([[User talk:Cjjjkscratch|talk]]) 06:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
||
:{{bcc|Cjjjkscratch}} Why? The semi is just to keep it from being vandalised by un-confirmed users. I see no evidence or need for increased protection. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 07:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
:{{bcc|Cjjjkscratch}} Why? The semi is just to keep it from being vandalised by un-confirmed users. I see no evidence or need for increased protection. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 07:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
||
::Then why do ''other'' pages have more protection? [[User:Cjjjkscratch|Cjjjkscratch]] ([[User talk:Cjjjkscratch|talk]]) 07:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:23, 10 May 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Protection policy page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
The project page associated with this talk page is an official policy on Wikipedia. Policies have wide acceptance among editors and are considered a standard for all users to follow. Please review policy editing recommendations before making any substantive change to this page. Always remember to keep cool when editing, and don't panic. |
This page is not for proposing or discussing edits to protected pages. To request or propose a change to a page that you are not able to edit, place a message on its talk page. If the page is fully protected, you may attract the attention of an admin to make the change by placing the
|
This page is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Counter-Vandalism Unit | ||||
|
Is it possible to create-protect all possible diacritic variations of a title?
I've recently been dealing with a persistent sockpuppeteer (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gsthae with tempo!) who likes to create nonsense drafts with similar titles (e.g. Draft:Gsthae with tempo! and Draft:Mixing Sailors). Now that many of those titles have been create protected, they continue by using variations of those titles with diacritics. Is there a way to prevent this? Partofthemachine (talk) 01:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
all possible diacritic variations
- no. If an LTA is going so far as to make ridiculous pages like this, I would actually suggest un-protecting the original/primary title, if only so you don't need to play whack-a-mole all day. Primefac (talk) 08:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)- @Partofthemachine: Apart from the fact that we don't pre-emptively protect pages, there are hundreds of characters which might be described as "letters with diacritics" and potentially millions of potential page titles. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The title blacklist might be more efficient than move protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The abuse filter can normalise text to remove diacritics etc. see "ccnorm" at mw:Extension:AbuseFilter/Rules format. So requesting a filter might be even better. the wub "?!" 12:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The title blacklist might be more efficient than move protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Should there be spaces for the names of the locks? (for example, Silver lock instead of Silverlock)
Before I was going to edit a page about the locks for protections, I noticed that the names for the locks didn't have spaces. OMGShay 92 (talk) 13:35, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- OMGShay 92, not sure what you mean? Are you referring to pages like WP:SILVERLOCK? The lock itself is named File:Semi-protection-shackle.svg. (please do not ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Those are mostly references to the our standard WP:SHORTCUT syntax, which is mostly "WP:ABCDEF" (where ABCDEF is all caps, goes to a redirect page, and links to a better title or section of a page with a better title). — xaosflux Talk 18:21, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
This page should have more protection.
As this page itself talks about protections, this page must be as protected as possible. It should have more than just semi-protection. Cjjjkscratch (talk) 06:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Why? The semi is just to keep it from being vandalised by un-confirmed users. I see no evidence or need for increased protection. Primefac (talk) 07:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Then why do other pages have more protection? Cjjjkscratch (talk) 07:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)