Jump to content

User talk:Zzuuzz/Archive 5: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Groupempty (talk | contribs)
PINCH!
Line 90: Line 90:
Hi, you have reverted the correct Assamese spelling and name to the wrong one, in your latest edit. Please revert your edits. Thanks. [[User:Chaipau|Chaipau]] 01:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you have reverted the correct Assamese spelling and name to the wrong one, in your latest edit. Please revert your edits. Thanks. [[User:Chaipau|Chaipau]] 01:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
:Hi. I made a simple revert to remove the huge helpme request in the page. Please revert it yourself to the correct version. Thanks. -- [[User:Zzuuzz|zzuuzz]]<sup>[[User_talk:Zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 01:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
:Hi. I made a simple revert to remove the huge helpme request in the page. Please revert it yourself to the correct version. Thanks. -- [[User:Zzuuzz|zzuuzz]]<sup>[[User_talk:Zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 01:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

== PINCH! ==

{{PINCH!}}

Revision as of 01:53, 18 March 2007

Hello, this is zzuuzz's talk page. Zzuuzz will probably reply on this page to messages left here unless you indicate you would prefer otherwise or you look like you might need the notification or if the discussion is actually happening elsewhere. Please add a new section to the end, and don't forget to sign your message using ~~~~. Thanks. -- zzuuzz(talk) 00:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Please start any new discussion at the bottom of this page


Last Warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from Wikipedia. -- Born Acorn(talk) 17:06, 17 March 2007 (GMT)

Norwich school renaming...

Ah - apologies - the title change was I thought necessary and well overdue, since the title broke wikipedia guidelines, but you are quite correct that I appear to have gone about it the wrong way. I've amended some of the content on the page, so I'd rather it wasn't just undone, but moved back by hand. I could do that, if you'd prefer and then we could go about moving it the correct way? There's basically another related problem in that there are currently poorly titled pages for Norwich school, Norwich School and Norwich School (educational institution) and for the school of art and design. I thought they should be sorted out and was endeavouring to start that process. I shall add this to your talk page too... Tom Coates 14:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protect

Hi, you deleted the page Fran Timbers, wel the creator has said that it is an attack page been created against him, whether this is true or not it has been recreted many times in the last few days so could you please create it and the protect it from recreation please. Thanks, its been a bit of edit warrning on these articles previously. Cheers and happy editing!! Tellyaddict 15:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that most socks today have been trying to delete the article. I am keeping an eye on it for the moment, with the salt to hand. BTW, you might want to check out what links to the article. -- zzuuzz(talk) 15:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This has been a bit of a problem recently, if its recreated again coudl you protect it as I'm discussing the problem with other users, the creator is asking me to help him - its hard work - I'm experienced but this DB removal tags of articles and stuff is tiring!! Thanks aain.Tellyaddict 15:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gwersyllt railway station

Gwersyllt railway station is the resident railway station of MIT. Hence, I am redirecting it to MIT Heywool 01:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dingodile

Thanks for protecting Dingodile... although it sure was enjoyable reading the back-and-forth arguing edit summaries in the article history over the past couple of months :-) Thomas Dzubin Talk 18:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:-) I was getting rather bored of them. -- zzuuzz(talk) 18:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block of 209.50.153.170

I discovered, after doing some rDNS, that it's registered to a school district. Should I unblock/reblock to allow account creation, or do you want to? Veinor (talk to me) 18:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I was going to return to it later. I am tempted to apply a long anon only {{schoolblock}} with account creation disabled. The previous edit history of that address does not bode well for future accounts created from it. -- zzuuzz(talk) 18:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Australia03

Hey there,

I just noticed that a user you blocked removed the block and all comments from their talk page (User_talk:Australia03). Not sure if that matters or not, just thought I'd let you know. --Searles2sels (PJ) 20:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. -- zzuuzz(talk) 22:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keeping it real

user:Keep it Real has openly expressed his desire to destroy Kyanka's life, business, and reputation; he has also openly threatened Kyanka's daughter. I doubt he'd ever actually harm the child, though. DS 03:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sock-Reincarnation of linkspammer you perma-blocked

I appears blocked spammer Irish Jwlrychc (talk · contribs) has returned as Mochara (talk · contribs) - same links, same articles. Can you deal with this or should I post to AIV or ANI? Thanks! Kathryn NicDhàna 20:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to be online at the moment, so I'll post to ANI :-) ~ Kathryn NicDhàna 21:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Not sure if its entirely appropriate (as I'm not one hundred percent reading through the help files yet) but I'd just like to thank you for being helpful with my introduction to wikipedia. Keep up the good work!

Removal of autoblock

I removed an autoblock on 60.234.48.118 resulting from your block of user:MightyWarriors. The block was affecting the editing of User:Ncox, who I know to be a good user. See the history of User talk:Ncox if required.-gadfium 01:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I agree. It's a small world, init. -- zzuuzz(talk) 01:48, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hi Zzuuzz. Thank you for your vote of support, and for taking care of my RfA during the week. Rest assured that I heard every voice loud and clear during the discussion, and will strive to use the mop carefully and responsibly. Thanks for your support, and please don't hesitate to give me constructive criticism anytime. Xiner (talk, email) 02:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

thanks for removing vandalisum from my page I only just noitceed it on my watchlist ♥Eternal Pink-Ready to fight for love and grace♥ 18:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks agian I was about to revert it but your to fast for me :} you'r not human ^...^ ♥Eternal Pink-Ready to fight for love and grace♥ 18:27, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sprotect

I don't know any other way other than sprotect to disable editing by unregistered users to protect an article that is being repeatedly vandalized by someone from an anonymous IP. How can I protect an article? -Mike Payne 15:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike. Protection can only be performed by admins, and there is a page to request protection at, Wikipedia:Requests for page protection (shortcut: WP:RPP). However in this case, rather than the dramatic step of protecting the page, I am just about to block the school vandal responsible. -- zzuuzz(talk) 15:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, User:Netsnipe beat me to the block. They have been blocked for 6 months. -- zzuuzz(talk) 15:40, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
They can't have been blocked for 6 months, they were undoing my edits this morning... If you look on their contribs page it has entries from 3/16. -Mike Payne 15:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And what is sprotection intended for? Only featured articles? -Mike Payne 15:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
They were blocked for 6 months, just after my first reply above [1]. Semi-protection is used for any heavily vandalised pages. The policy is at WP:PPOL. To get a rough idea of what constitutes heavy vandalism, see WP:RFPP. In most cases it is preferable to block the vandals rather than exclude all unregistered editors. -- zzuuzz(talk) 16:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
True... I'm just not an admin and can't block people myself, and it sucks to have to wait while their IP is on the request list and their doing more damage in the meantime. -Mike Payne 16:57, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting the vandalism, I doubt i'd have noticed if i hadn't seen it on recent changes. Cheers mate, Jonomacdrones 17:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

7chan page.

Anonymous demands, that you bring back the 7chan page, and further more state your reasoning for deleting the page! Lulzicon 17:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who? The page was deleted because it did not assert any notability (CSD A7). It only included a very short sentence, and you have given no other indication of its importance. -- zzuuzz(talk) 17:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Selenite page

Thanks zzuzz for both your welcome and your help - I've fixed my errors - and I'll keep trying to remember to fill in the edit summaries - I have senior moments sometimes. Ashley.AshleyWitchcrafter 20:40, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I think it could still do with some work (wikification), I'll see if I can help out with it later. -- zzuuzz(talk) 20:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again, zzuuzz, I've done some more work on the selenite article - thank you for your formatting changes - was both unsure and reluctant to do those - so thank you also for teaching me by example. Hopefully, the article is now better. AshleyAshleyWitchcrafter 17:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have reverted the correct Assamese spelling and name to the wrong one, in your latest edit. Please revert your edits. Thanks. Chaipau 01:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I made a simple revert to remove the huge helpme request in the page. Please revert it yourself to the correct version. Thanks. -- zzuuzz(talk) 01:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PINCH!

Template:PINCH!