Jump to content

Talk:James C. Kulhanek: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 11: Line 11:
:Thank you for starting the discussion! I first suspected AI (or perhaps a hoax) when I saw that several of the dates are off—"off" as in "impossible". The sentence beginning {{tq|In December 1989}} cites a source from 1980. Paintings were exhibited {{tq|between October 10 and 15, 1977}} cited September 25, 1977. Another {{tq|between March 5 and 31, 1978}} cited March 5, 1978. (Is that an ''announcement'' of the exhibition? The title suggests it is. If so, that's no more helpful than a press release. A better source would be a journalist reporting on the exhibition.) Another clue (to me) was the lack of links to sources, as we often find with fabricated AI-generated text. Of course, [[WP:OFFLINE|offline sources]] are acceptable, but Google searches for the titles don't turn up ''anything''. It's simply inconcievable to me that ''none'' of these sources have been archived somewhere—not by Newsbank, not by Newspapers.com, not by anything searchable in Google. Individual searches at [https://cleveland.newsbank.com/ Newsbank] turned up no results as well. I mean, I'm having trouble getting results for the ''authors'' of these articles. Everything here points to AI or a hoax. I'm sorry if that's not the case, but I remain unconvinced.
:Thank you for starting the discussion! I first suspected AI (or perhaps a hoax) when I saw that several of the dates are off—"off" as in "impossible". The sentence beginning {{tq|In December 1989}} cites a source from 1980. Paintings were exhibited {{tq|between October 10 and 15, 1977}} cited September 25, 1977. Another {{tq|between March 5 and 31, 1978}} cited March 5, 1978. (Is that an ''announcement'' of the exhibition? The title suggests it is. If so, that's no more helpful than a press release. A better source would be a journalist reporting on the exhibition.) Another clue (to me) was the lack of links to sources, as we often find with fabricated AI-generated text. Of course, [[WP:OFFLINE|offline sources]] are acceptable, but Google searches for the titles don't turn up ''anything''. It's simply inconcievable to me that ''none'' of these sources have been archived somewhere—not by Newsbank, not by Newspapers.com, not by anything searchable in Google. Individual searches at [https://cleveland.newsbank.com/ Newsbank] turned up no results as well. I mean, I'm having trouble getting results for the ''authors'' of these articles. Everything here points to AI or a hoax. I'm sorry if that's not the case, but I remain unconvinced.
:If sources are found, much of the text will have to be rewritten to follow what the sources say. I'm also concerned that this much text is [[WP:DUE|undue]] for the page on James C. Kulhanek. That single section was about 3.5 times as large as the rest of the article. Is this one painting of such long-lasting importance? I doubt it. A Google search for "James Kulhanek" "Dennis Kucinich" returns exactly 2 results, this Wikipedia article and [https://case.edu/ech/articles/k/kulhanek-james-charles this article at case.edu which appears to have been written by the artist's son]. [[User:Woodroar|Woodroar]] ([[User talk:Woodroar|talk]]) 22:50, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
:If sources are found, much of the text will have to be rewritten to follow what the sources say. I'm also concerned that this much text is [[WP:DUE|undue]] for the page on James C. Kulhanek. That single section was about 3.5 times as large as the rest of the article. Is this one painting of such long-lasting importance? I doubt it. A Google search for "James Kulhanek" "Dennis Kucinich" returns exactly 2 results, this Wikipedia article and [https://case.edu/ech/articles/k/kulhanek-james-charles this article at case.edu which appears to have been written by the artist's son]. [[User:Woodroar|Woodroar]] ([[User talk:Woodroar|talk]]) 22:50, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
::This is very helpful. I appreciate your providing details and suggestions. I can easily understand your concerns about AI/hoax; however, I've seen the print articles that are cited so they do exist. I'll dig around and see if I can find anything online, but some of these smaller newspapers just aren't of interest to the online databases and repositories. Would providing quotes within the references be of help as well if those offline sources are included? Also, it generally sounds your other suggestion is to pare back the section to the essential information? All that said, I find the incident interesting with the intersection of a private citizen and three local Cleveland administrations (Kucinich, White, and Campbell). Thanks again for engaging on this. I'm seeing this as a learning opportunity. [[User:Hamaxides|Hamaxides]] ([[User talk:Hamaxides|talk]]) 14:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:23, 20 July 2023

Deletion of Portrait Section

@Woodroar had mentioned on the edits: "removing WP:LLM addition; sources appear to be fake, often dated before the event they're supposedly reporting on." I know that actual newspaper articles were used for the citations and that a LLM wasn't used. However, I'm interested to know their concerns and to see if there's a way to salvage the text. The Kucinich portrait incident is an interesting intersection between local government and art in Cleveland. Hamaxides (talk) 21:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for starting the discussion! I first suspected AI (or perhaps a hoax) when I saw that several of the dates are off—"off" as in "impossible". The sentence beginning In December 1989 cites a source from 1980. Paintings were exhibited between October 10 and 15, 1977 cited September 25, 1977. Another between March 5 and 31, 1978 cited March 5, 1978. (Is that an announcement of the exhibition? The title suggests it is. If so, that's no more helpful than a press release. A better source would be a journalist reporting on the exhibition.) Another clue (to me) was the lack of links to sources, as we often find with fabricated AI-generated text. Of course, offline sources are acceptable, but Google searches for the titles don't turn up anything. It's simply inconcievable to me that none of these sources have been archived somewhere—not by Newsbank, not by Newspapers.com, not by anything searchable in Google. Individual searches at Newsbank turned up no results as well. I mean, I'm having trouble getting results for the authors of these articles. Everything here points to AI or a hoax. I'm sorry if that's not the case, but I remain unconvinced.
If sources are found, much of the text will have to be rewritten to follow what the sources say. I'm also concerned that this much text is undue for the page on James C. Kulhanek. That single section was about 3.5 times as large as the rest of the article. Is this one painting of such long-lasting importance? I doubt it. A Google search for "James Kulhanek" "Dennis Kucinich" returns exactly 2 results, this Wikipedia article and this article at case.edu which appears to have been written by the artist's son. Woodroar (talk) 22:50, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is very helpful. I appreciate your providing details and suggestions. I can easily understand your concerns about AI/hoax; however, I've seen the print articles that are cited so they do exist. I'll dig around and see if I can find anything online, but some of these smaller newspapers just aren't of interest to the online databases and repositories. Would providing quotes within the references be of help as well if those offline sources are included? Also, it generally sounds your other suggestion is to pare back the section to the essential information? All that said, I find the incident interesting with the intersection of a private citizen and three local Cleveland administrations (Kucinich, White, and Campbell). Thanks again for engaging on this. I'm seeing this as a learning opportunity. Hamaxides (talk) 14:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]