User talk:Rhain: Difference between revisions
→GTA Online: re |
→GTA Online: adding input |
||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
::Oh, okay. My apologies. I was under the assumption that the user of the IP address was vandalizing. My apologies. [[User:Conservative Steve|Conservative Steve]] ([[User talk:Conservative Steve|talk]]) 23:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC) |
::Oh, okay. My apologies. I was under the assumption that the user of the IP address was vandalizing. My apologies. [[User:Conservative Steve|Conservative Steve]] ([[User talk:Conservative Steve|talk]]) 23:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::No worries. I initially assumed the same, so it's understandable. I'd recommend explaining reversions {{diff2|1169411823|in edit summaries}} in future to avoid confusion. All the best. <span style="nowrap">– [[User:Rhain|<span style="color: #008;">'''''Rhain'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Rhain|☔]] <small>([[he/him]])</small></span> 23:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC) |
:::No worries. I initially assumed the same, so it's understandable. I'd recommend explaining reversions {{diff2|1169411823|in edit summaries}} in future to avoid confusion. All the best. <span style="nowrap">– [[User:Rhain|<span style="color: #008;">'''''Rhain'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Rhain|☔]] <small>([[he/him]])</small></span> 23:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
::::@[[User:Conservative Steve|Conservative Steve]], when I saw the supposed comparison, it just didn't belong. It's like comparing apples and oranges. |
Revision as of 02:32, 9 August 2023
2011 ·
2012 ·
2013 ·
2014
2015 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2016 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2017 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2018 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2019 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2020 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2021 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2022 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2023 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2024 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
Your GA nomination of Mission to the Unknown
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mission to the Unknown you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 20:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mission to the Unknown
The article Mission to the Unknown you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mission to the Unknown and Talk:Mission to the Unknown/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 16:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | ||
Thank you for all your work! --evrik (talk) 15:32, 7 July 2023 (UTC) |
The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | ||
Thank you for all your hard work --evrik (talk) 16:07, 7 July 2023 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Mission to the Unknown
The article Mission to the Unknown you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mission to the Unknown for comments about the article, and Talk:Mission to the Unknown/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 18:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
The Eras Tour
Hi. I undid your recent edit to The Eras Tour. The prose is hard to navigate and hence bolding is used to demarcate the acts separately. It's okay to ignore a rule if it's improving the article. ℛonherry☘ 10:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- I disagree that it improves the article—seems needlessly distracting to me, certainly no reason to ignore the MoS—but I'm apathetic. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 11:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Have you got any plan to turn that article into GA? Anyway, your work on those articles are impressive. 2001:4455:650:A900:A54F:1CA1:71E6:AE42 (talk) 12:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! Yep, it's definitely on the cards; I plan to revisit that topic soon. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 12:53, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Eight years! |
---|
Good plan! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
DYK for Mission to the Unknown
On 1 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mission to the Unknown, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Mission to the Unknown" is the only Doctor Who serial not to feature the Doctor at all? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mission to the Unknown. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mission to the Unknown), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Oh My God, Charlie Darwin
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oh My God, Charlie Darwin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
GTA Online
How is it unsourced original research? Thanks. Conservative Steve (talk) 23:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Conservative Steve: There is no (immediate) source that supports the comparison to Zombies. An editor has presumably reached that conclusion themselves; thus, it is original research. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. My apologies. I was under the assumption that the user of the IP address was vandalizing. My apologies. Conservative Steve (talk) 23:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- No worries. I initially assumed the same, so it's understandable. I'd recommend explaining reversions in edit summaries in future to avoid confusion. All the best. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Conservative Steve, when I saw the supposed comparison, it just didn't belong. It's like comparing apples and oranges.
- No worries. I initially assumed the same, so it's understandable. I'd recommend explaining reversions in edit summaries in future to avoid confusion. All the best. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. My apologies. I was under the assumption that the user of the IP address was vandalizing. My apologies. Conservative Steve (talk) 23:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)