Talk:Social Credit System: Difference between revisions
→UK Credit System: new section |
|||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:Firstly, the article has a section about all of that. It's the criticism section. Please read that section and add info you think is missing. |
:Firstly, the article has a section about all of that. It's the criticism section. Please read that section and add info you think is missing. |
||
:Secondly, the article linked really doesnt discuss specifics of the social credit system, just that academics are concerned and then there's some links to other cnbc articles that also mostly avoid specifics. Feel free to add the article in the criticism section, CNBC is generally considered a reliable source, but I don't think it's saying what you think it is. [[User:Carlp941|Carlp941]] ([[User talk:Carlp941|talk]]) 03:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC) |
:Secondly, the article linked really doesnt discuss specifics of the social credit system, just that academics are concerned and then there's some links to other cnbc articles that also mostly avoid specifics. Feel free to add the article in the criticism section, CNBC is generally considered a reliable source, but I don't think it's saying what you think it is. [[User:Carlp941|Carlp941]] ([[User talk:Carlp941|talk]]) 03:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
== UK Credit System == |
|||
The article states as fact - "The difference between the two systems is that the credit rating system in the UK is just for loaning of monies from organisation to individuals based on their previous financial activities...". This is incorrect, since the credit rating system in the UK takes into a account a range of non-financial factors, not least of which is presence on the electoral register. [[User:Geekpie|Geekpie]] ([[User talk:Geekpie|talk]]) 19:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:34, 31 August 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Social Credit System article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days ![]() |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | Daily page views
|
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
EU considers banning as high-risk dangerous AI social credit systems like that in China
The article completely ignores the analyses done by European legislative bodies on this issue, including its impact on human rights, civil liberties, and potential for ethno-social discrimination. See [CNBC news article pointing to further references] 24.6.18.19 (talk) 20:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- I think you need to reread this article and you need to examine your source critically.
- Firstly, the article has a section about all of that. It's the criticism section. Please read that section and add info you think is missing.
- Secondly, the article linked really doesnt discuss specifics of the social credit system, just that academics are concerned and then there's some links to other cnbc articles that also mostly avoid specifics. Feel free to add the article in the criticism section, CNBC is generally considered a reliable source, but I don't think it's saying what you think it is. Carlp941 (talk) 03:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
UK Credit System
The article states as fact - "The difference between the two systems is that the credit rating system in the UK is just for loaning of monies from organisation to individuals based on their previous financial activities...". This is incorrect, since the credit rating system in the UK takes into a account a range of non-financial factors, not least of which is presence on the electoral register. Geekpie (talk) 19:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class Systems articles
- Mid-importance Systems articles
- Systems articles in systems
- WikiProject Systems articles
- C-Class China-related articles
- High-importance China-related articles
- C-Class China-related articles of High-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- C-Class Mass surveillance articles
- Mid-importance Mass surveillance articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Mid-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- High-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles