Jump to content

Talk:Social Credit System: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Geekpie (talk | contribs)
Line 32: Line 32:
:Firstly, the article has a section about all of that. It's the criticism section. Please read that section and add info you think is missing.
:Firstly, the article has a section about all of that. It's the criticism section. Please read that section and add info you think is missing.
:Secondly, the article linked really doesnt discuss specifics of the social credit system, just that academics are concerned and then there's some links to other cnbc articles that also mostly avoid specifics. Feel free to add the article in the criticism section, CNBC is generally considered a reliable source, but I don't think it's saying what you think it is. [[User:Carlp941|Carlp941]] ([[User talk:Carlp941|talk]]) 03:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
:Secondly, the article linked really doesnt discuss specifics of the social credit system, just that academics are concerned and then there's some links to other cnbc articles that also mostly avoid specifics. Feel free to add the article in the criticism section, CNBC is generally considered a reliable source, but I don't think it's saying what you think it is. [[User:Carlp941|Carlp941]] ([[User talk:Carlp941|talk]]) 03:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

== UK Credit System ==

The article states as fact - "The difference between the two systems is that the credit rating system in the UK is just for loaning of monies from organisation to individuals based on their previous financial activities...". This is incorrect, since the credit rating system in the UK takes into a account a range of non-financial factors, not least of which is presence on the electoral register. [[User:Geekpie|Geekpie]] ([[User talk:Geekpie|talk]]) 19:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:34, 31 August 2023

EU considers banning as high-risk dangerous AI social credit systems like that in China

The article completely ignores the analyses done by European legislative bodies on this issue, including its impact on human rights, civil liberties, and potential for ethno-social discrimination. See [CNBC news article pointing to further references] 24.6.18.19 (talk) 20:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to reread this article and you need to examine your source critically.
Firstly, the article has a section about all of that. It's the criticism section. Please read that section and add info you think is missing.
Secondly, the article linked really doesnt discuss specifics of the social credit system, just that academics are concerned and then there's some links to other cnbc articles that also mostly avoid specifics. Feel free to add the article in the criticism section, CNBC is generally considered a reliable source, but I don't think it's saying what you think it is. Carlp941 (talk) 03:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UK Credit System

The article states as fact - "The difference between the two systems is that the credit rating system in the UK is just for loaning of monies from organisation to individuals based on their previous financial activities...". This is incorrect, since the credit rating system in the UK takes into a account a range of non-financial factors, not least of which is presence on the electoral register. Geekpie (talk) 19:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]