Talk:Archaeopteryx: Difference between revisions
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
The article states, ''"Archaeopteryx had three separate digits on each fore-leg each ending with a "claw". Few birds have such features,"'' and then mentions a few contemporary birds that have a more noticeable vestigial claw underneath their wings. Perhaps it's worth adding that this ancestral wing configuration with actual separate digits and claws (no need for quotes on claws, by the way, suggests they're not quite claws) was retained in many uncontested birds that are extinct now, [https://www.internationalornithology.org/PROCEEDINGS_Durban/Round%20Table%20discussions/rt32.htm perhaps all] [[enantiornithes]]. ("All known enantiornithines were good fliers. The early Cretaceous enantiornithines had toothed jaws, and late Cretaceous ones did not. All enantiornithines had wing digits with claws." -- quote from the article I linked). Wikipedia's own article on the group states they're "the most abundant and diverse group known from the Mesozoic era." [[Special:Contributions/45.234.133.177|45.234.133.177]] ([[User talk:45.234.133.177|talk]]) 08:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC) |
The article states, ''"Archaeopteryx had three separate digits on each fore-leg each ending with a "claw". Few birds have such features,"'' and then mentions a few contemporary birds that have a more noticeable vestigial claw underneath their wings. Perhaps it's worth adding that this ancestral wing configuration with actual separate digits and claws (no need for quotes on claws, by the way, suggests they're not quite claws) was retained in many uncontested birds that are extinct now, [https://www.internationalornithology.org/PROCEEDINGS_Durban/Round%20Table%20discussions/rt32.htm perhaps all] [[enantiornithes]]. ("All known enantiornithines were good fliers. The early Cretaceous enantiornithines had toothed jaws, and late Cretaceous ones did not. All enantiornithines had wing digits with claws." -- quote from the article I linked). Wikipedia's own article on the group states they're "the most abundant and diverse group known from the Mesozoic era." [[Special:Contributions/45.234.133.177|45.234.133.177]] ([[User talk:45.234.133.177|talk]]) 08:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
== The secondary flightlessness hypothesis may be relevant to mention here == |
|||
The article mentions that some researchers have found A. to be nested within Deinonychosaurs "and therefore not a bird," but not that long ago other researchers had sort of found the "opposite," Deinonychosaurs nested as a sister group to Archaeopteryx, and therefore possibly/arguably flightless birds. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25875499/ Some have also posited that perhaps juvenile Deinonychosaurs could fly]. So, perhaps that's suggestive of something somewhat blurrier. A more recent study (2019) mentioned in the [[Origin_of_birds#Secondary_flightlessness_in_dinosaurs|Origin of Birds]] article, "secondary flightlessness section," also puts Archaeopteryx closer to birds than to Deinonychosaurs. [[Special:Contributions/45.234.133.177|45.234.133.177]] ([[User talk:45.234.133.177|talk]]) 08:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:33, 17 October 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Archaeopteryx article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:Vital article
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Archaeopteryx is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 29, 2007. | |||||||||
|
Birn-Jeffery et al. (2012)
Birn-Jeffery, A. V., Miller, C. E., Naish, D., Rayfield, E. J., Hone, D. W. E. (2012) Pedal claw curvature in birds, lizards and Mesozoic dinosaurs – complicated categories and compensating for mass-specific and phylogenetic control. PLoS ONE 7(12): e50555.
Phylogenetic position
I thought it could be worth mentioning that the studies by Wang et al. (2018)[1] and Hartman et al. (2019)[2] concluded Archaeopteryx was closer to Dromaeosauridae and Troodontidae than to Neornithes. Mortimer's "Theropod Database" agrees with Hartman's proposed phylogeny on multiple aspects, including Archaeopteryx's position.[3]Kiwi Rex (talk) 01:42, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- I really don't have the expertise to write that up, but I suppose it could start off by elaborating the main hypotheses (Archaeopteryx is closer to birds than other dinosaurs, Archaeopteryx is closer to other dinosaurs than to birds [e.g. the Lori paper], and of course maniraptorans are not in actuality coelurosaurs, then elaborate each hypothesis, and then go into the question of multiple origins of flight or multiple losses. 138.88.18.245 (talk) 23:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Some IP replaced ‘bird-like dinosaur’ the short description with ‘bird with saurian features’ Cheers Markbassett (talk) 22:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Why does not change until this time
Comr with your answer 41.59.84.74 (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Greek name
Archaios in Greek means ‘original’ or ‘from the beginning’; arche being the beginning/origin. It is nothing literally to do with ancient, that’s just a deduction. It is the winged creature that was there first. The ‘original-winged’ if you will. 2A01:C22:B8C8:2F00:FDF1:55C:EE00:A394 (talk) 07:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Spelling Variation
It seems all of the -ise/-ize words in this article are spelt -ize, since this isn't usually normal British spelling (except oxford spelling) should all of these be changed to -ise or left as -ize? If left as -ize I think there should be a tag saying to use Oxford spelling instead of British english to be clearer. Ertoe (talk) 04:34, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ize is consistent with UK English (Oxford is within the sphere of UK English), both versions can be used. Of course, if "ize" is the version used, it is just important that it's internally consistent, which it seems to be. But I see both "colour" and "color", "center" instead of "centre", etc. FunkMonk (talk) 10:21, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Digits on birds' forewings are rather common on extinct birds
The article states, "Archaeopteryx had three separate digits on each fore-leg each ending with a "claw". Few birds have such features," and then mentions a few contemporary birds that have a more noticeable vestigial claw underneath their wings. Perhaps it's worth adding that this ancestral wing configuration with actual separate digits and claws (no need for quotes on claws, by the way, suggests they're not quite claws) was retained in many uncontested birds that are extinct now, perhaps all enantiornithes. ("All known enantiornithines were good fliers. The early Cretaceous enantiornithines had toothed jaws, and late Cretaceous ones did not. All enantiornithines had wing digits with claws." -- quote from the article I linked). Wikipedia's own article on the group states they're "the most abundant and diverse group known from the Mesozoic era." 45.234.133.177 (talk) 08:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
The secondary flightlessness hypothesis may be relevant to mention here
The article mentions that some researchers have found A. to be nested within Deinonychosaurs "and therefore not a bird," but not that long ago other researchers had sort of found the "opposite," Deinonychosaurs nested as a sister group to Archaeopteryx, and therefore possibly/arguably flightless birds. Some have also posited that perhaps juvenile Deinonychosaurs could fly. So, perhaps that's suggestive of something somewhat blurrier. A more recent study (2019) mentioned in the Origin of Birds article, "secondary flightlessness section," also puts Archaeopteryx closer to birds than to Deinonychosaurs. 45.234.133.177 (talk) 08:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- FA-Class bird articles
- High-importance bird articles
- WikiProject Birds articles
- FA-Class dinosaurs articles
- High-importance dinosaurs articles
- WikiProject Dinosaurs articles
- FA-Class Palaeontology articles
- High-importance Palaeontology articles
- FA-Class Palaeontology articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- FA-Class Teylers articles
- Mid-importance Teylers articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once