Jump to content

Talk:2023 Lewiston shootings: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:


''''Admin warning''' Nobody has any business posting suspect names or links until it is amply reported by a consensus of major news outlets. I've already protected the aricle and warned editors about this. Please stop, and wait. This rush to post a name has potential for great harm to innocent individuals. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 03:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
''''Admin warning''' Nobody has any business posting suspect names or links until it is amply reported by a consensus of major news outlets. I've already protected the aricle and warned editors about this. Please stop, and wait. This rush to post a name has potential for great harm to innocent individuals. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 03:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

:A significant number of remaining revisions have a name in them, the oldest I can find being {{oldid|2023 Lewiston shootings|1181926587|revision 1181926587}}. — [[User:Greentryst|Greentryst]] <sup>[[User_talk:Greentryst|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Greentryst|C]]</sub> 03:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)


== Coordinated attacks? ==
== Coordinated attacks? ==

Revision as of 03:08, 26 October 2023

shooting/shootings

Police reports indicate only one shooter. Since it occurred at multiple locations media sources seem to be conflicted on whether this is one "shooting" or multiple (ABC reports former, CNN latter). Looking for consensus on which title is more correct Elijahr241 (talk) 01:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple shootings. See 2022 Saskatchewan stabbings. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 01:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think the plural option, shootings, works better. @Elijahr241: what do you think? City of Silver 02:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
plural works better because even if it is one guy, it's still seperate instances of mass murder in different locations
Most people will identify it as seperate shootings in different areas Marmorda (talk) 02:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bit conflicted because to me, "shootings" implies multiple suspects. Maybe it could just be made clear in the lead that it was all one guy (at least, once we have more information) Elijahr241 (talk) 02:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay! I changed it to singular but if anyone wants to change it back, go for it Marmorda (talk) 02:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Concur that this should be plural because at least 3 places have been shot up. Clyde [trout needed] 02:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suspect

Has <redacted per BLP> been identified as the suspect by police? Local Facebook (I know, so reliable) groups and people are identifying him as (redacted). Marmorda (talk) 02:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refresh yourself on the BLP policy, probably shouldnt be dropping names like this at such a preliminary stage. @Acroterion you may need to hide this discussion thread. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 02:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, sorry! Marmorda (talk) 02:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Removed his name! Marmorda (talk) 02:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You forgot to at the start of your comment as well, also page revisions will need to be blanked. No worries but in the event it isn't who people are id-ing the picture, it can be real bad news bears. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 02:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've yet to see any official statements or news reports, only twitter and facebook. Elijahr241 (talk) 02:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Acroterion. Just scrolling through the twitter thread there is so much conflicting information and I would be very hesitant to add anything to the article from any of those sources. Qwexcxewq (talk) 03:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bangor Daily News claims a Maine Department of Public Safety spokesperson has confirmed the name. SpaceTeapot (talk) 03:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

'Admin warning Nobody has any business posting suspect names or links until it is amply reported by a consensus of major news outlets. I've already protected the aricle and warned editors about this. Please stop, and wait. This rush to post a name has potential for great harm to innocent individuals. Acroterion (talk) 03:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A significant number of remaining revisions have a name in them, the oldest I can find being revision 1181926587. — Greentryst TC 03:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinated attacks?

Any information on whether it was coordinated between multiple suspects? Did they intentionally try to go for a high score? 2605:8D80:404:9D6:D9CC:757D:2060:A51A (talk) 03:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Calling it a high score? Marmorda (talk) 03:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]