Jump to content

User talk:Skitash: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Warning: Copyright violation on Phoenician settlement of North Africa.
Line 110: Line 110:


:Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The user's [[WP:FORUMSHOP|forum shopping]] is quite absurd. [[User:Skitash|Skitash]] ([[User talk:Skitash#top|talk]]) 22:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
:Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The user's [[WP:FORUMSHOP|forum shopping]] is quite absurd. [[User:Skitash|Skitash]] ([[User talk:Skitash#top|talk]]) 22:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

== December 2023 ==

[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|30px|link=|alt=Copyright problem icon]] Your edit to [[:Phoenician settlement of North Africa]] has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrighted]] material to Wikipedia without evidence of [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission|permission]] from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''content'', such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''. See [[Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources]] for more information. <!-- Template:uw-copyright --> — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 15:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:53, 2 December 2023

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1962 Algerian crisis has been accepted

1962 Algerian crisis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 05:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your work on North Africa

Hi, I love your work, if you are French speaking, could you do the same thing on the French wikipedia? or at least translate the articles you create into French. HanKim20 (talk) 18:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your appreciation of my work, I was looking forward to doing so soon. Skitash (talk) 19:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, we need so much your contribution on the french wikipedia, I hope soon ^^. HanKim20 (talk) 13:05, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet on French conquest of Algeria

I've created a SPI report here. Cheers — AP 499D25 (talk) 11:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reporting them. Skitash (talk) 11:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arab migrations to the Maghreb you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 14:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Arab migrations to the Maghreb you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Arab migrations to the Maghreb for comments about the article, and Talk:Arab migrations to the Maghreb/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 09:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain a revert you did in July?

Hi, could you please explain why you reverted my edit (different IP, it's dynamic) <here>? The citation still has the problems I pointed out when I removed it (and the text after it) which is that it was improperly done -> it circularly mentions a citation that existed back in 2007 when it was added, but does not appear to exist now.
Granted you or I could have tried finding said citation and made it correctly, but I didn't think it or the text after was really needed for that particular list, as it's linking to said page (and the text after it was seemingly never supported by citations). – 2804:F14:80FB:2E01:9513:7B7D:14E3:DEDD (talk) 00:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appeared to me that you deleted sourced content. The citation mentioned Talbi, whose book can be found in the Bibliography section of the page. Either way, I sourced the statement with a better and easily accessible citation. Skitash (talk) 13:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, that's fair, I must have missed it. Thank you for the explanation and for fixing the citation. – 2804:F14:80FB:2E01:9151:EF40:3E6C:C4A0 (talk) 23:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Thanks for pointing out the issue with the source. Skitash (talk) 15:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Why don’t you agree on putting a colored photo for Gamal Abdel Nasser page?

Thanks Masry684 (talk) 01:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is best to keep the original and non-artificial image. Also, you would have to seek consensus on the talk page before making such edit. Skitash (talk) 08:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand you, you’re right. That’s why the last photo I put was originally colored, the one from 1969, it was not artificial.
Not to mention that the original photo existing now is not an appropriate photo for a president. Not any president from any country have the main photo of his page smiling this wide smile.
Please advise how to achieve consensus so I can succeed in this edit.
Thanks Masry684 (talk) 13:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The last photo you added might not be the ideal choice as it seems to be a low-quality image from a social media platform. The current image seems satisfactory in my opinion, although I would not mind changing it back to this photo [1], which was previously used as the infobox photo. If you would like to seek consensus, please read Wikipedia:Consensus and start a discussion on the article's talk page. Skitash (talk) 14:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maghrebis

Hi, can you add your page on the Arab migrations to the Maghreb to this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maghrebis?

The user "The Adam Truth" tries to misinform, he does the same on the French version of wikipedia (too bad you don't intervene there too, your article should be translated ...) HanKim20 (talk) 10:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. The article on Maghrebis appears to be excessively centered on one specific subject. I was looking forward to contributing information on various other topics to the page. Skitash (talk) 13:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
For your contributions to toward Arabic African countries. Thank you. It is appreciated. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 11:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Reading Beans Thank you very much. I appreciate the encouragement you've given. Skitash (talk) 11:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of Six-day war in October

Hi!

Sorry, but I don't understand how Saudi Arabia was not involved in the war when they deployed troops to Jordan who clearly was involved in the war. NecromancerOfEnchanting (talk) 09:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sources that were intended to support Saudi Arabia's involvement in the war only stated that Saudi troops arrived at Ma'an to strengthen the Jordanian defence positions in Jordan. They were not directly involved and did not take part in any fighting (e.g. in the West Bank). Please read this source [2] "Saudi Arabia played no significant role in the events leading up to the June war. No Saudi troops fought in the war—only a small detachment of Saudi troops entered southern Jordan to help the Jordanian military, but they arrived too late to fight." Skitash (talk) 10:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
oh ok thanks! NecromancerOfEnchanting (talk) 21:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Laayoune or Laâyoune

Hi! In fact, Laâyoune has a â on the second A, it's written like this because when you pronounce you must make un inflexion on second A, it's transliterated from arabic. The Laâyoune without the â looks wierd, can you explain why we should not write it like it is written in the country ? Heralune (talk) 01:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:COMMONNAME, the most commonly used name should be favored. In this case, "Laayoune" is more widely recognized and used than "Laâyoune."[3] Additionally, the accepted name of the subject in the article body should be consistent with the title, which is Laayoune in this case, per MOS:LEAD. The Arabic transliteration belongs in the Arabic language template. Skitash (talk) 10:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

You have been mentioned, here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The user's forum shopping is quite absurd. Skitash (talk) 22:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Phoenician settlement of North Africa has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]