Talk:Race and society: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:27, 20 January 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Race and society article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.

Arbitration Ruling on Race and Intelligence

The article Race and society, along with other articles relating to the area of conflict (namely, the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, broadly construed), is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, described in a 2010 Arbitration Committee case where the articulated principles included:

Pillars: Wikipedia articles must be neutral, verifiable and must not contain original research. Those founding principles (the Pillars) are not negotiable and cannot be overruled, even when apparent consensus to do so exists.
Original research: Wikipedia defines "original research" as "facts, allegations, ideas, and stories not already published by reliable sources". In particular, analyses or conclusions not already published in reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy are not appropriate for inclusion in articles.
Correct use of sources: Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources. Primary sources are permitted if used carefully. All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than to original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors.
Advocacy: Wikipedia strives towards a neutral point of view. Accordingly, it is not the appropriate venue for advocacy or for advancing a specific point of view. While coverage of all significant points of view is a necessary part of balancing an article, striving to give exposure to minority viewpoints that are not significantly expressed in reliable secondary sources is not.
Single purpose accounts: Single purpose accounts are expected to contribute neutrally instead of following their own agenda and, in particular, should take care to avoid creating the impression that their focus on one topic is non-neutral, which could strongly suggest that their editing is not compatible with the goals of this project.
Decorum: Wikipedia users are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously in their interactions with other users; to approach even difficult situations in a dignified fashion and with a constructive and collaborative outlook; and to avoid acting in a manner that brings the project into disrepute. Unseemly conduct, such as personal attacks, incivility, assumptions of bad faith, harassment, or disruptive point-making, is prohibited.
Tag-team editing: Tag teams work in unison to push a particular point of view. Tag-team editing – to thwart core policies (neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research); or to evade procedural restrictions such as the three revert rule or to violate behavioural norms by edit warring; or to attempt to exert ownership over articles; or otherwise to prevent consensus prevailing – is prohibited.

If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the full arbitration case page. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sociology C‑class Top‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Anthropology C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Ethnic groups C‑class Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Revision of introduction for clarity and depth

I've gone ahead and revised the introduction for clarity. However, I have some concerns about my new introduction that I'm going to put here. Ainzy (talk) 05:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned that the new introduction talks too much about the historic invention of our current concept of race, I tried to keep it brief but I don't think I succeeded
The original introduction says that "some interpretations" of race are "deconstructionist" and "post-structuralist" and thus take the historical construction of race into account. It's widely accepted in academia that race is socially constructed, so I didn't include the terms deconstructionism or post-structuralism when talking about this because it seemed slightly irrelevant.
The original also hyperlinked biological/genetic determinism in a sentence in which it talked about "racial attributes beyond mere anatomy" as being socially and culturally determined, which is contradictory. I decided to exclude biological determinism entirely and instead focussed on scientific racism, which I believe they were trying to refer to.
Overall, I think the new introduction sounds less racist (I don't think the original one was actually racist but the ambiguous wording made it hard to tell) but I think it could stand to briefly talk about race in modern society.

Ainzy (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 :# I'm concerned that the new introduction talks too much about the historic invention of our current concept of race, I tried to keep it brief but I don't think I succeeded
 :# The original introduction says that "some interpretations" of race are "deconstructionist" and "post-structuralist" and thus take the historical construction of race into account. It's widely accepted in academia that race is socially constructed, so I didn't include the terms deconstructionism or post-structuralism when talking about this because it seemed slightly irrelevant.
-:# It also hyperlinked biological/genetic determinism in a sentence in which it talked about "racial attributes beyond mere anatomy" as being socially and culturally determined, which is contradictory. I decided to exclude biological determinism entirely and instead focussed on scientific racism, which I believe they were trying to refer to.
+:# The original also hyperlinked biological/genetic determinism in a sentence in which it talked about "racial attributes beyond mere anatomy" as being socially and culturally determined, which is contradictory. I decided to exclude biological determinism entirely and instead focussed on scientific racism, which I believe they were trying to refer to.
 :# Overall, I think the new introduction sounds less racist (I don't think the original one was actually racist but the ambiguous wording made it hard to tell) but I think it could stand to briefly talk about race in modern society.
 :[[User:Ainzy|Ainzy]] ([[User talk:Ainzy|talk]]) 06:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC)