Jump to content

User talk:Vogelman29: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted Reply
Vogelman29 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
Line 38: Line 38:
:::::There's pretty broad latitude in what you can and can't do on your own talk page. Really, as long as you aren't explicitly rude and you don't just 100% ignore all users' concerns with editing. See [[Wikipedia:User pages]] to understand the actual guideline on the general user space, which is mostly about your user page than your talk, but mostly applies, etc. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 23:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
:::::There's pretty broad latitude in what you can and can't do on your own talk page. Really, as long as you aren't explicitly rude and you don't just 100% ignore all users' concerns with editing. See [[Wikipedia:User pages]] to understand the actual guideline on the general user space, which is mostly about your user page than your talk, but mostly applies, etc. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 23:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
::::::Okey thanks :) [[User:Vogelman29|Vogelman29]] ([[User talk:Vogelman29#top|talk]]) 00:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
::::::Okey thanks :) [[User:Vogelman29|Vogelman29]] ([[User talk:Vogelman29#top|talk]]) 00:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

== March 2024 ==
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[WP:CIR]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;[[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2&cent;</b>]] 01:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-block -->
*If I am to assume that you aren't trolling (which is a possibility), then I have to assume you lack the ability to understand what Contentious Topics are, after you have been told. Rather than blocking as an Arb Enforcement sanction, I'm blocking as a standard admin action under [[WP:CIR]] / [[WP:DE]], because I feel your editing would be a problem regardless of area you chose to edit in. You insist on creating multiple articles that have serious content issues, in spite of getting good and patient advice to not do so. Again, this is why I can only assume you lack the competency to edit in a collaborative environment like Wikipedia. Any admin is free to modify or remove this sanction without prior consultation, but I do request a notification afterwards. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2&cent;</b>]] 01:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
*:Why am I blocked? I just wanted to educate people about anti-Semitism. This is represented in North Africa and also in Bulgaria. I canceled the one in North Africa because apparently one editor didn't agree with it [rather not with the one in Algeria, he didn't care about the others]. I just wanted to clarify the connections between the Polisario and terrorists [especially Hamas]. I wasn't even finished drafting Polisario. I would probably have deleted half of them again. I think it's unfair that I'm being blocked because I address the grievances of the Jewish population. Which I have documented with sources [at least in North Africa]. In Bulgaria I would have also pointed out the sources... sorry, but blocking someone who addresses anti-Semitism in different countries is really sad. [[User:Vogelman29|Vogelman29]] ([[User talk:Vogelman29#top|talk]]) 05:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
*::@[[User:Vogelman29|Vogelman29]] That's not the reason for your block nor a response to Dennis Brown. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 08:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
*:::@[[User:Dennis Brown|Dennis Brown]]@[[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]] Yes, okay, I'm sorry. Maybe I shouldn't have brought up these sensitive topics. I would really appreciate it if you would unblock me. I would still like to create biographies of Israeli television stars and create television series and more. I think that shouldn't bother anyone. I promise if you unblock me I won't bring up any political topics or etc anymore. If you unblock me I would be very happy. [[User:Vogelman29|Vogelman29]] ([[User talk:Vogelman29#top|talk]]) 19:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
*::::<small>Non-admin comment</small> @[[User:Vogelman29|Vogelman29]] You need to '''''read''''' and understand your block's reasoning. Once you demonstrate that you understand why you were blocked, you can request an unblock (I can't do it for you, I'm not an admin). "I'm sorry...I would really appreciate it if you would unblock me" is not valid unblock reasoning. '''This is also ''not'' the place to request an unblock'''. [[User:Mseingth2133444|<span style="color:MidnightBlue">Mseingth2133444</span>]] ([[User talk:Mseingth2133444|<span style="color:Blue">talk</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mseingth2133444|<span style="color:Green">contribs</span>]]) 00:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
*::::Quoting Q6 on [[WP:UNBLOCK]]:
*::::"An indefinite block does not mean that you are 'blocked forever'. It simply means the blocking administrator did not set a time limit or expiration for the block. In this case, the blocked user will usually be required to appeal their block and discuss the matter with an administrator before an unblock will be considered." [[User:Mseingth2133444|<span style="color:MidnightBlue">Mseingth2133444</span>]] ([[User talk:Mseingth2133444|<span style="color:Blue">talk</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mseingth2133444|<span style="color:Green">contribs</span>]]) 01:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:48, 16 March 2024

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Vogelman29, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 11:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okey thanks. Vogelman29 (talk) 13:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by M.Bitton (talkcontribs) 21:23, March 9, 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Polisario's connection to terrorist organizations, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Polisario's connection to terrorist organizations and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Polisario's connection to terrorist organizations during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 06:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Koavf Can I delete your comment from my talk page? since I have already said everything about this. And from my point of view it can also be deleted. Vogelman29 (talk) 20:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are not obliged to keep messages on your talk page. You can archive it, but you are also not obliged to do that. I appreciate you asking, but you do you on your talk page. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 20:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vogelman29 Archiving is always best. Doug Weller talk 20:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then I'll leave it like that. I would just like to remove the warning from M.Bitton because the paragraph was also removed. The reason was wrong but the result was right. Do you think I can do that? Vogelman29 (talk) 23:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's pretty broad latitude in what you can and can't do on your own talk page. Really, as long as you aren't explicitly rude and you don't just 100% ignore all users' concerns with editing. See Wikipedia:User pages to understand the actual guideline on the general user space, which is mostly about your user page than your talk, but mostly applies, etc. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 23:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okey thanks :) Vogelman29 (talk) 00:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]