Talk:Mary Rambaran-Olm: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:47, 6 April 2024

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Women's Classical Committee

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Classical Committee, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Classical Committee articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's Classical CommitteeWikipedia:WikiProject Women's Classical CommitteeTemplate:WikiProject Women's Classical CommitteeWomen's Classical Committee articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Noteworthyness!

since the current Elrington Bosworth Professor of Anglo-Saxon at the University of Cambridge does not have a Wikipedia page, why does this junior academic in the same field deserve a page?

The page is irrelevant and should be deleted! Presalernitan (talk) 16:11, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page explaining Wikipedia's notability policy gives the background. The range of independent, reliable sources discussing Rambaran-Olm mean that her inclusion is pretty cut and dry.

I was going to suggest that you could start the article on the current Elrington and Bosworth Professor of Anglo-Saxon at the University of Cambridge, but since Rosalind Love (still listed Elrington and Bosworth Professor) already has a Wikipedia article, perhaps you have someone else in mind? Richard Nevell (talk) 17:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Her notability today largely derives from her PR stunts decrying the term "Anglo-Saxon" as being a "white supremacist" term, despite the vast, vast majority of White British people viewing the Anglo-Saxons as a people of the past. --SinoDevonian (talk) 22:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 :The page explaining Wikipedia's [[WP:N|notability policy]] gives the background. The range of independent, reliable sources discussing Rambaran-Olm mean that her inclusion is pretty cut and dry.
 :I was going to suggest that you could start the article on the current [[Elrington and Bosworth Professor of Anglo-Saxon]] at the University of Cambridge, but since [[Rosalind Love]] ([https://www.asnc.cam.ac.uk/people/Rosalind.Love/ still listed] Elrington and Bosworth Professor) already has a Wikipedia article, perhaps you have someone else in mind? [[User:Richard Nevell|Richard Nevell]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell|talk]]) 17:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
+::Her notability today largely derives from her PR stunts decrying the term "Anglo-Saxon" as being a "white supremacist" term, despite the vast, ''vast'' majority of White British people viewing the Anglo-Saxons as a ''people of the past.'' --[[User:Trans-Neptunian object|SinoDevonian]] ([[User talk:Trans-Neptunian object|talk]]) 22:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)