User talk:Who.do.I.love?

March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fracture. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User talk:Bongwarrior, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -WarthogDemon 05:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) 05:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

One more chance

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Who.do.I.love? (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please let me have one more chance, I promise, on the soul of my grandmother that I will not continue to vandalise wikipedia, please, I am sorry.

Decline reason:

Given violations of WP:NPA like this, you appear to have no intention of contributing positively. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Who.do.I.love? (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I know I have made some personal attacks, but I am ready to stop, and I know that if I make another vandal like edit, I will be blocked, please, assume good faith for me once, you won't regret it, I want to turn around, I want to change, let me, please.

Decline reason:

Your request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
• Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
• Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = Article title =)
• Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
• When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. --  Netsnipe  ►  06:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I have done what needs to be done, can I please be unblocked now?}}

Contacting blocking admin, stand by --Chris 10:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Helpme

{{helpme|I have done everything as requested, but no one seems to have done anything, can someone please unblock me now?}}

You simply have to wait for an administrator to reply to your request. Sorry. Mⁱc_rochip ⁰⁸ 07:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme|What happens in a month when my block expires, will I be able to create an account and edit like nothing has happened?}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Who.do.I.love? (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have learned my lesson, I want to contribute to the encyclopaedia, these accounts have been blocked indefinitely, and I really would like another chance. All I can give you is my word, and please take a look at User:WilliamMThompson's contributions, I have made good edits under that name, and I want another chance. Please instead of just denying this request and protecting this page, please talk to me, because I think you will find that all I ever wanted to do was contribute, I have made mistakes but I want to start again. So pondering my request, assume good faith, and please remember that blocks are meant to be preventative not punishment. I would like another name, like I want account creation to be blocked, so you know that I am not creating socks, but I would like an account created for me that allows me to edit and to show that I am well meaning. My IP is static, so you will probably be able to block it indefinitely. Thank you. Who.do.I.love? (talk) 11:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your actions have shown conclusively that you have no intention of abiding by our policies and guidelines. During your last unblock, you were warned not to blow your chance. You ignored this warning. — Yamla (talk) 12:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I know

I have been editing longer than you have (just on an IP though, I created my first account recently), if I get through this, I am nominating you for adminship. Note above that I have used the helpme template to get your attention, please continue to monitor this page. Who.do.I.love? (talk) 12:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

• You're not using the helpme template for actual help, you seem to be using it just to get attention. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 12:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

So I can talk to someone, my mind needs challenging, my brain needs stimulation, splease talk to me, let me comprehend, why are you being so high and mighty all of a sudden, I thought that we were getting on nicely. Who.do.I.love? (talk) 12:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)