Jump to content

Talk:Love for Sale (Bilal album): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Albums}}, {{WikiProject Jazz}}, {{WikiProject R&B and Soul Music}}, {{WikiProject Rock music}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.
Line 31: Line 31:
{{WikiProject Rock music|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Rock music|importance=low}}
}}
}}

== Sourcing concerns ==

{{u|Gog the Mild}}, {{u|Hurricane Noah}}, I won't be renominating the article for FA in light of {{u|Hog Farm}}'s source review, which shows this to be an uphill labor not worth taking at the expense of picking apart the article, which is fine as is for real-life readers who, in my experience, have no idea what FA's even are and cannot see the icons atop the article in mobile view (where most people browse anyway). I do stand by describing the original source review as controversial since [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Love_for_Sale_(Bilal_album)/archive1#Spot_check|another reviewer abstained from offering a second opinion]] and [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Love_for_Sale_(Bilal_album)/archive1#Support_from_Tbhotch|another, like me, refuted the targeting of AllMusic as not being a high-quality source]]. But I ultimately would agree with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_article_candidates%2FLove_for_Sale_%28Bilal_album%29%2Farchive3&type=revision&diff=1025092013&oldid=1025090058 this sentiment]. So unless better sources arise covering this topic in the future, I won't trouble this further and accept this as the article's ceiling. Sorry all for the nuisance. [[User:Isento|isento]] ([[User talk:Isento|talk]]) 20:07, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

: Damn, this one really got away from me. [[User:Piotr Jr.|Piotr Jr.]] ([[User talk:Piotr Jr.|talk]]) 06:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==

Revision as of 17:22, 15 May 2024

Former featured article candidateLove for Sale (Bilal album) is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleLove for Sale (Bilal album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 2, 2021Good article nomineeListed
March 17, 2021Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 9, 2021Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 26, 2021Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:54, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was a fitting end, for the review to fail, almost a parallel to the narrative and emotional arc of the album... Piotr Jr. (talk) 19:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]