Jump to content

User talk:Livelikemusic: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 247: Line 247:
::Because the source has not been updated yet. The edits were made in good faith, there is absolutely no reason to revert them per [[WP:TWABUSE]], you should either try to improve it or leave it for future editors to improve. You can also consider moving the problem to the Talk page. For now, I added an additional citation that presents live updates for the surprise songs, it should solve the problem for now and for future contributions. [[User:Medxvo|Medxvo]] ([[User talk:Medxvo|talk]]) 21:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
::Because the source has not been updated yet. The edits were made in good faith, there is absolutely no reason to revert them per [[WP:TWABUSE]], you should either try to improve it or leave it for future editors to improve. You can also consider moving the problem to the Talk page. For now, I added an additional citation that presents live updates for the surprise songs, it should solve the problem for now and for future contributions. [[User:Medxvo|Medxvo]] ([[User talk:Medxvo|talk]]) 21:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


::: You've accused me, a second time, of not assuming [[WP:GOODFAITH|good faith]] and mis-using Twinkle — either of which I've done. [[WP:Verifiability]] states: {{xt|Even if you are sure something is true, it must have been previously published in a reliable source before you can add it}} and per [[WP:BURDEN]], it states: {{xt|All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports[b] the contribution.[c]}}; users have every right to remove unsourced claims from articles. And, considering you were the one reverted, per [[WP:BRD]], it's up to ''you'' to take it to the page's talk page. The problem is with the editor attempting to add the information, without any kind of citation, not the person removing unsourced information. '''<span style="font-size:95%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#2980b9">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:95%;">([[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#8e44ad">TALK!</span>]])</span> 22:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
::: You've accused me, a second time, of not assuming [[WP:GOODFAITH|good faith]] and mis-using Twinkle — either of which I've done. I never once stated the edits were in bad faith; merely that they were not sourced, which is valid use of reverting added content. [[WP:Verifiability]] states: {{xt|Even if you are sure something is true, it must have been previously published in a reliable source before you can add it}} and per [[WP:BURDEN]], it states: {{xt|All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports[b] the contribution.[c]}}; users have every right to remove unsourced claims from articles. And, considering you were the one reverted, per [[WP:BRD]], it's up to ''you'' to take it to the page's talk page. The problem is with the editor attempting to add the information, without any kind of citation, not the person removing unsourced information. '''<span style="font-size:95%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#2980b9">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:95%;">([[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#8e44ad">TALK!</span>]])</span> 22:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:19, 19 May 2024