Jump to content

User talk:Livelikemusic/Talk Page Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk here! All talks here are to be respectable, calming, and non-insulting. Past is past, and this is the present. And please correctly sign your talks with the four tildes [~ ~ ~ ~] (without the spaces) or I will not respond to your inquiry. Also, please title your new section, as well. To make sure you do this successfully, just press the "Post new message" above. Do not edit my page to add and/or remove what you want. If you interrupt a discussion for your own, I will automatically delete. No questions or hesitations about it. All discussions are welcome here. Also, do not interrupt someone else's and I's conversation or I will remove it automatically. I won't be involved in petty arguments, I don't have the time for you if that's all you're looking for from me. Any personal insults thrown at me are automatic deletion and reporting to an administrator. Thank you! Musicfreak7676 my talk page!

Due to time constraints and past incidents, I will be limiting my time and involvement on Wikipedia. My new start here will be different and more focused. I will focus more on myself, my friends and soap opera articles. Please follow all of my talk page rules, and I will do the same for yours. Also, I will not be forming any cliques or joining in on any arguments. My time here is strictly for bettering the pages and articles that I am choosing to edit, not to make "friends" or "enemies".
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheryl Cole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologize

[edit]

Hey, I just wanted to apologize about me being a previous disruptive editor, and how that affected you. My behavior was irresponssible and I am very sorry. I tried to put you against you're friends (like who does that?) which I am very sorry. However, now I have changed, I have created three featured list articles ([1], [2], [3]) and one who is ongoing ([4]). Would you please accept my apologie? I know that you said you're not here to make friends but at least can we be civil to each other? Plus, welcome back! I hope you have a blast editing! You are needed here, so much!  — SoapFan12 Talk smile 12:22, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, it's been a week that I have wrote you this message. I hope you got this message, and I would really appreciated to be responded. Please, I just want response to know that you have receive the message. Thanks!  — SoapFan12 Talk smile 23:12, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Has been read. livelikemusic my talk page! 23:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do this mean, we are good?  — SoapFan12 Talk smile 23:36, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Seeing Double (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | Next album = {{ubl|''[[Don't Stop Movin' (album)|Don't Stop Movin']]''|(2002}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Marcy Rylan as Abby.jpg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Marcy Rylan as Abby.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 19:27, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I rarely do talk pages...hope this is the correct way to do it!

[edit]

Your talk page said to do it this way, so I hope this works!

Hello, Livelikemusic. You have new messages at Jason47a's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

User:William569

[edit]

Hi Livelikemusic. You remember me. I hope everything is okay with you. As you probably are aware I have retired from Wikipedia and, with the exception of rare appearances such as this one, I no longer consider myself part of this community.

I see that during my absence you have had your share of problem with User:William569. Well, William569 is in reality only William313. If you ever have any problems with him again in the future, the following link could be of help to you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/William313.

Take care. Farine (talk) 08:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Farine! How are you?! TYSM for this piece of information. Once they return from their two-week ban, I'll re-open their sockpuppet investigation. TYSM! I appreciate it! Certain users need to take responsibility for their actions and stop returning! livelikemusic my talk page! 14:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I had the wrong SPI case. I've linked you to Bull-Doser instead of William313. It's been corrected now. Farine (talk) 15:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent. I found it anywho, aha. Thanks again. Will re-open the case once the sock returns. livelikemusic my talk page! 15:42, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at his numerous unblock requests, he never write anything in them other than his username or IP adress. Either that or he write "your reason here". That in itself should be enough to convince the clerk and checkuser of a connection between the accounts (or IP adresses). But if you want other evidence, you could always talk about his obsession of Guiding Light returning to the TV Land channel.
Well Livelikemusic, I'm returning to retirement. I've returned to Wikipedia yesterday to have the sock-puppet of another disruptive editor blocked. My purpose has been done and I'm returning to retirement. I hope you're enjoying your time on Wikipedia and I wish you well in whatever endeavor you're pursuing at the moment. Take care. Farine (talk) 16:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
TYSM Farine! Will miss you once again! Keep in touch! livelikemusic my talk page! 16:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Covers

[edit]

Your cover is also high quality which is not allowed per WP:NFCC which states that low-mid quality is sufficient for identification purposes. Just because its from their website doesn't mean its correct. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 21:39, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then lemme ruin the quality because it's the correct colour. livelikemusic my talk page! 21:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :)

[edit]

Hello, could you please help me? I need to upload the cover of this album "Inevitable, I do not know how to do it :S Please help me. Regards--JudithJunkers (talk) 23:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

source

[edit]

is youtube a good source or isn't it? why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.159.238.200 (talk) 15:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(tps) Depends on the item, but generally, no. While there is no automatic ban on Youtube (despite the fact that some editors think so), most entries do not qualify. See WP:YOUTUBE--SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Socks

[edit]

If Winguard comes back again you can also let me know. When I'm around I'm pretty quick to react if a CU is not needed. Ponyo did the most recent one very quickly too. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:54, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! TYSM! I know it's a pain, but it's just annoying when a sock is obviously unable to handle the punishment of their actions. They've continued to come back for months after a year's ban for the same thing. livelikemusic my talk page! 03:24, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wingard's main IP is now blocked for a few months, so there should be some relief there. I have found sleepers in the past, so it is helpful to run a CU whenever he pops up.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Once again Ponyo, thank you much! Sorry for being such an annoyance! livelikemusic my talk page! 14:17, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]

I'm sorry but I do not seem to understand your talk page rules. What am I to do if I'd like to start a discussion with you? Perhaps we can talk on my talk page? I'm not trying to be rude, hostile or combative.--DendroNaja (talk) 19:56, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All you needed to do was start a new discussion, which is exampled at the top of my page. That is all. livelikemusic my talk page! 19:58, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So did I do it right this time? --DendroNaja (talk) 20:00, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. All you needed to do was start a brand new discussion, instead of interrupting a previous one to start your discussion. livelikemusic my talk page! 20:01, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, cool. Sorry I didn't really realize. Anyways, I think the personality section in the Kristen article is a neat and important addition since she is such a complex character. I changed the wording around so that it doesn't say that she has BPD, but that she was diagnosed by a psychiatrist as such and based on her long-term behavioral patterns, she MAY be afflicted with the condition. She displays all the traits and behaviors common to BPD and she has over a long number of years. This is what we call in psychology a maladaptive pattern of behavior. What happens in such cases is that people are diagnosed with a personality disorder. I personally believe that Kristen is a full-fledged BPD, but I am not going to diagnose her as such in the article. I re-wrote it in a way that leaves the reader with the impression that she may have it, not that she does have it. --DendroNaja (talk) 20:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that. Re-wording it helped, since in published material, it was never suggested that she has BPD. She may have it, but just by having its traits does not automatically mean she is suffering from such. We could need published materials, where it is discussed on her potentially having this personality disorder. It's how Wiki is run, off of resources and valid sources. What we personally believe to be true, and what is true within the fields of a fictional character is not always easy, since things can be retconned through writing. Fictional characters in reality are not people such as you and I are in the real world. livelikemusic my talk page! 20:15, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. It is trickier with fictional characters, but with Kristen it is so obvious. I believe that any psychologist or psychiatrists who observes her long-term behavioral patterns, traits, and her view of herself and those around her will conclude that she is a borderline personality disordered individual and/or even possibly a narcissistic personality disorder. The two disorders are basically the same, only that borderlines tend to be less worried about their self-image and more concerned with attaining the love of others. To anyone who has studied psychology, her behavior and attitudes will be extremely obvious. Still, she is a fictional character and whether she has it or not is up for debate. Many fictional characters have had actual psychologists and psychiatrists assess them and diagnose them with various personality disorders, including Darth Vader (BPD), Patrick Bateman from American Psycho (BPD), Hannibal Lector (AsPD), etc --DendroNaja (talk) 20:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's what you're missing. Being obvious does not mean it's true. You cannot as a real life person diagnose a person with a disorder unless you are, in reality, the head scribe of the series, which can be re-written to be untrue. A new head scribe could come in tomorrow and write her as a nun, and could undo years of her personality. It's how soap operas work. They're a specified piece of fiction unlike prime-time or films. You're going off of traits, and without core evidence through the text of the series, you cannot prove that she has BPD. It's happened before within a soap and its character after years of awkward behavior until it was explained as bi-polar personality. Until then, people speculated she was just written wrong. No publication and/or writing suggests that she could even have BPD, other than carrying some of its traits. I could carry the traits, but does that mean I have the disorder? No. livelikemusic my talk page! 20:27, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bi-polar disorder is not a personality type, it is an Axis I mood disorder just like depression or Obsessive-compulsive disorder. Axis I disorders are ego-dystonic which means that all aspects of a person's thoughts, impulses, and behavior (the disorder(s)) that are felt to be repugnant, distressing, unacceptable, or inconsistent with the self-conception. It means that they know that there is something wrong with them (e.g. someone with depression knows its not normal to be that way and so they are distressed by the fact that they are depressed). Personality disorders are on Axis II and they are ego-syntonic which means all aspects of a person's thoughts, impulses, attitudes, and behavior that are felt to be acceptable and consistent with the self-conception. It means people with PD's believe that there is nothing wrong with them and they are normal (e.g. a BPD who kills her husband because he wanted to leave her - in her head it's justified and right because how can he leave her? In her mind it is an attack on her ego and her narcissism will not tolerate it). However, you're right, Kristen can be written as a nun starting tomorrow. However, as of now she has shown the same pattern of behaviors and traits for years. These are not just traits, they are maladaptive traits that have repeated over and over for a long period of time which makes it a pattern. Thus, she is a candidate to be seriously discussed as possibly having a borderline personality disorder. Anyone can have these traits, but when a person behaves in this manner over a long period of time means there is a pattern and where there is a pattern of maladaptive behavior, there usually is a personality disorder. Kristen displays (or is written in such a way) that is quite extreme. --DendroNaja (talk) 20:43, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Also, don't you think that the "head scribe" can be hinting that Kristen is a BPD through Dr. Marlena Evans' diagnosis of her as having such a condition? --DendroNaja (talk) 20:48, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I was merely using bi-polar as an example only. You're taking this far too literal, which within soaps cannot be so easily done. Once again, you're judging a written character on a soap opera based on real life instances. And without core findings from the show and/or published material for the show, you cannot say she has or does not have BPD. You cannot take a soap opera so seriously that it begins to be this in depth in explaining, especially on Wikipedia. She could have BPD, or she could just be emotionally brought on by her past tortures and love she may have for a past love. It's not easily set in stone, and that's what you're not understanding. You're trying to make Kristen a real person, when she's merely fictional. As for Marlena, it's hard to believe her diagnosis and whether she's not targeting Kristen, due to their long withstanding history of being against each other. That's like me going up to someone I hate and saying they're mentally unstable if I were a doctor. That would be a bit biased. livelikemusic my talk page! 20:50, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
But like I said above, couldn't the "head scribe" be saying that she is BPD through Dr. Marlena Evans? Why else would the head writer mention such a thing? --DendroNaja (talk) 20:54, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I am taking this a bit too literally - maybe because I have a background in psychology, who knows? She is a fictional character and cannot be capsuled into a diagnosis, especially a mental health diagnosis. There are real examples of borderline personalities in real life: Angelina Jolie, Jeffrey Dahmer, Kari Ann Peniche, Brandon Marshall, and many others. Kristen is a fictional character. I apologize if I wasted your time. --DendroNaja (talk) 21:00, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You did not waste my time. I do enjoy conversations such as this. As for the head scribe mentioning it, we don't know. It could have been Marlena rationalizing why Kristen is the way she is. But Marlena isn't the most objective person when it comes to Kristen, given their history. livelikemusic my talk page! 21:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of hosts / judges on The X Factor infoboxes

[edit]

Hi, I have looked at the template guidelines and it doesn't state the order in which they should be listed, just that they should be listed --MSalmon (talk) 09:19, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it actually does. "Cast are listed in original credit order followed by order in which new cast joined the show." That right there says it. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:49, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And where does it say that next to the judges section? It doesn't. --MSalmon (talk) 14:51, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It can be used for both. Why should it matter which order they're in anyway? It doesn't harm anyone to keep them in the order they're in now. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:53, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It should say that on the template then --MSalmon (talk) 14:54, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's common sense that the judges list order is the same as the cast list order. The judges are essentially the cast, it just uses a different word in the infobox. –anemoneprojectors– 15:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, it should. Instead of edit-warring this, we should all take it to the template to discuss further. Edit-warring will not get us anywhere. And thank you Anemone! livelikemusic my talk page! 15:08, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologize and Favors

[edit]

I want to apologize for my behavior towards you when I was not being very nice to you when I got the news of me getting blocked. I should of known that you were doing you're job as a good Wikipedian. When you do that, there is nothing you need to apologize for. Thanks for telling me that! lol. Again, I am sorry and I know I previously told you the same thing but trust me this time you will never have to report me anymore and deal with me anymore. I am sorry again. I hope you can forgive me! :( (first favor). The second is that, do you mind creating a page for Aly Forrester? Since you're work on Theresa Donovan and Ava Jerome are beyond amazing and also Aly's is a very a major character and what I can infer from is, she is going to be on contract. I would of createdthe article myself but as you can see my hard work is best in lists related articles and you are one of the best editors have seen. Also, you should teach me one of you're tricks one day, lol. Regards,  — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 11:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page for Aly Forrester will likely take time. We unfortunately only have enough information on casting, and reception of the child actor's portrayal (if even). It'll likely take a while to develop her page. But thank you for your compliments on the other pages I've done. I can start a basic page, and develop until it's time to post it. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:35, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That fine! Thanks for willing! No need to thank me, you deserve those compliments. Also, I was wondering if you could review this FLC?  — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 15:09, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alien

[edit]

Well then you will see when you are proven wrong because I know for a fact the song is Alien. Twitter is a better source when those two tweets are from the song writers themselves. Gcampbell92 (talk) 02:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read WP:TWITTER about how sources through Twitter work. You "knowing" something is not how Wiki works, either. I may know the world could end tomorrow, doesn't mean it's right. You seem to like instigating arguments and battles on Wikipedia. That's showing signs of owning an article. As a friendly tip, I'd be careful with that one! Wiki doesn't take kindly to it. livelikemusic my talk page! 02:31, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well DigitalSpy is wrong if you go to the article (http://www.digitalspy.com/music/news/a523605/britney-spears-william-orbit-song-title-revealed-as-aliens.html) their source is from an audio interview with Billy The Kidd (http://www.spreaker.com/user/billythekidd/talkin_to_britney_spears_about_album) and if you listen to it she says Alien not Aliens. Gcampbell92 (talk) 02:43, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'm done arguing with you, because you really are showing severe signs of owning an article and I try to not interact with members who show signs of such. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:50, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How do you get that? I just showed you that Digital Spy used that interview to get the song title and they heard it wrong and also in that Digital Spy article they used Twitter as a source so how is that any different from a tweet directly from a song's writer? Gcampbell92 (talk) 16:25, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Hello, LLM, how are you? I hope everything is going well for you. I was wondering if you need help for anything, such as a article you need help editing etc? Also, why do you think about the soaps so far? GH is amazing however as I can infer from Finola Hughes and Michael Fairman interview we won't see Robin reunite with her family anytime soon since she has not yet taped scene with KM. I am so excited for JMW return on B&B, ARE you? or Are you Team Hope, lol! I hope that Hope and Wyatt do get together but as much as I am a fan of Steffy, I want her to stay clear of Liam! He is such a douchebag. I have missed like 4 or 5 episodes of B&B, DAYS and Y&R. Therefore, I better catch up, lol! Cheers,  — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 15:03, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing well. I don't believe I need much help around the Wiki parts here. I'm working on articles on my off time when I have the ability and time to go and edit them. But I do appreciate that offer; if I think of anything I will ask. As for Hope VS. Steffy, I've always been more #TeamHope because she didn't steal away Liam like Steffy did. But I grew to like Steffy around the time she lost the baby. But I am not a Liam fan at all, not with how he's treated both women, especially Hope. The Spencer clan is too much for me, aside from Caroline! Hope all is well with you! livelikemusic my talk page! 01:00, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP Soap Operas in the Signpost

[edit]

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Soap Operas for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 12:56, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Very honoured, and would love to participate. I'll definitely answer the questions within the next day, if not by tonight! =) Sounds like a fantastic opportunity. livelikemusic my talk page! 00:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Where should I respond? On my talk page or the sign post you linked to? livelikemusic my talk page! 00:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please reply on the linked page. Other editors will be replying to the questions in the same space, so be sure to sign your comments. –Mabeenot (talk) 01:03, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Will get to answering now! I'm quite excited. Thank you for your response! livelikemusic my talk page! 01:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Don't forget. –Mabeenot (talk) 02:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I won't I'm sorry I haven't gotten to it sooner! Life got a bit hectic on my end. Will do so right now!! livelikemusic my talk page! 20:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

[edit]

I don't understand the logic. We can't remove cast members that aren't with the show anymore? I even mentioned the SID it was featured in. What is the issue? And about Judge Lomax, there's a HUGE difference between someone who recurs over a period of about two months and who is a recurring character for years. Notice how she wasn't used in either courtroom scene? The actress hasn't been on screen in over eight months. And she's still with the show? You've GOT to be kidding. If she's that important, we can re add her if she ever appears again. It's not a big deal, I don't understand why you're attacking me. I'm trying to keep the page up-to-date and remove people that aren't with the show. We can't just leave former cast members in the current cast members section because they're our personal favorites or because we feel like it (and I have no idea why you care about some random judge). --Alexisfan07 (talk) 08:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexisfan07: Alexisfan, we've all told you time and time again over the years to not delete cast members and to use creditable sources to prove your points. You continue to fail to do so, and it's tiring to know that you cannot follow the rules. It's persistently a hassle. it has zero to do with the liking or not liking a character. It has to do with sourcing. And it's not just Mayor Lomax (not Judge). It has to do with you ignoring how cast members work and how Wikipedia works, too. I've tried talking to you several times about it, and you've ignored it. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:43, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Small text in infobox

[edit]

Please tell me what MOS. There are hundreds of articles that have parentheticals small in infoboxes. --Musdan77 (talk) 18:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to direct to the font size manual instead of MOS. It states:

Editors should avoid manually inserting large and small fonts into prose. Increased and decreased font size should primarily be produced through automated facilities such as headings or through carefully designed templates. Additionally, large tables may require a decreased font size in order to fit on screen. When it is necessary to specify an increased or decreased font size, the specification should be done as a percentage of the original font size and not as an absolute size. This improves accessibility for visually impaired users who use a large default font size..

Shrinking the text makes it harder for those with viewing disabilities to view information within the infobox especially. livelikemusic my talk page! 19:29, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
But, that specifically refers to "prose" and "tables". If it was such a problem in infoboxes, then it would be on MOS:INFOBOX (and it wouldn't be allowed on so many articles as it is). --Musdan77 (talk) 20:27, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It should still be considered for those with viewing disabilities and that they may struggle with smaller texts. And because other articles follow the trend does not mean it should be picked up. Because the argument could be made that others don't apply small text. livelikemusic my talk page! 20:34, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Emme Rylan as Abby (2013) picture

[edit]

It seems like your picture for Emme Rylan as Abby is apparently in violation and is going to be deleted, I don't see it violating anything though. Jester66 (talk) 04:24, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Jester66: It was decided via a discussion (not by my choice) that it violates the fair use qualifications, since both Ordway and Rylan look-alike and that a free image from Rylan's article (which there is none) would be better suited within the article. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Favor

[edit]

Hello,

I need a favor. I told this user ONCE that Sheila Carter, Lauren Fenmore, Ashley Abbott and Amber Moore that the series that they are most known for should be in the series parameter and the others series should be in the crossover parameter. I do not want to revert, to violate the three-revert rule and I know the right thing to do is to contact him but I have absoutely no interest on doing that and I am not confortable to do so. Therefore, I was wondering if you can help me, tell him what should be and show him the reason which the conversation we had on crossover/series parameters([5]).  — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 23:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RPDR 6

[edit]

Hello,

I see that you removed the article about RuPaul's Drag Race (season 6) saying it's too early and not enough details. I would like to bring your attention to a page like the season 16 of US Big Brother, which there is much less details than what was on the RPDR 6 page, and the show will start in more than 7 months, yet there is still a page. This is only an example, but there are other shows or article like that with less details still up there.

I am wondering why we should delete the Season 6 page, when we have relevant information like all the contestants, part of the prize, and also the fact that it's in less than two months, and we have good sources that we can link to the page.

I would appreciate if you could tell me why the page was deleted. I am one of the few that takes care of editing the RPDR every year. Every year, around December, with the same amount of details, the page is still created and we add details as they come. It would be fair for everyone fan to the show to have this reference until February.

Thanks! ─ Fabzzz talk 18:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. And just because another page or others have done the same thing, does not mean one should, too. The page fails from sources from reliable places and has not notability yet for its season. The page wasn't deleted, it was redirected back to the main page of the series. And just because you've done something before does not mean under any terms it's right. You're welcome to try expanding upon the page with a "construction" tag, but I believe it's far too early for there to be a page, considering we don't even have a premiere date set in stone (other than February). livelikemusic my talk page! 19:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Gregory

[edit]

Hey, I notice your edit on Thomas Forrester, explaining that Gregory is on reccuring. I was wondering where did you find that fact because I cant find any references to prove it? It will be very much appreciated! Thanks!  — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 17:49, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@SoapFan12: It's been long speculated that he's been dropped from contract, and he made a tweet saying he was "gone" from the show, but is now saying he's not a regular since the direction of his career is changing. Plus, he was removed from the opening credits this week! And since the show especially doesn't list anyone who isn't contract, that's a big indicator that he's off the show as a contract/regular cast member. I have a sneaking suspicious, especially with the recast of Ridge, that they're recasting Thomas, too. Though, his storyline has fizzled out for the most part. livelikemusic my talk page! 17:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry

[edit]

I wasn't trying to disrupt the edits. I was going to go back and cite the SID properly when I got home, I was at work at the time. I didn't think it would be a problem. I don't know how I was supposed to correct the airdates due to the preemption. I thought mentioning it in the comments would suffice. I apolgize if it does not. I am not trying to vandalize the page but if you feel like I am of no use, then I will stop editing. I thought my figuring out Ryan Carnes' airdate on the script photos was helpful but if it's important not to cite Twitter, then so be it. --Alexisfan07 (talk) 22:22, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kiki Jerome

[edit]

I was wondering if you could change Kiki's image? I just don't think it fits well. I could not find any images with high resolution therefore I came to you, to see if you could find some? Btw, thank you for the explanation about Thomas.  — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 19:24, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@SoapFan12: I can certainly try my best to find something better for Kiki. Will hunt a bit now! livelikemusic my talk page! 19:42, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

[edit]
Merry Christmas Livelikemusic
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! Even though, we had disagreements in the past, we became good friends! May 2014, bring you love, peace etc! I wish you all the best! Again, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!  — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 21:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
@SoapFan12: Thank you so much! You're too sweet to do this! livelikemusic my talk page! 16:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PJ/OLTL

[edit]

Hey there! I just noticed that you've been having some trouble with Soapfan2013 (PJ) in regards to OLTL articles. I wanted to let you know that this editor has a long history of disruptive behavior, and I had extended issues with him/her back in 2008/2009 (I was pretty inactive on soap articles after that). Back then he/she was editing as "Onelifefreak2007" ... I can only imagine what he/she has been up to since! Anyway, I hope you don't mind but I dug up some of the documentation from that time from an archived subpage, basically a history of conflict and the many blocks PJ suffered due to edit warring and the use of sock puppets. I've included it in a collapsed section below, but please feel free to delate it from your talk page if it is too cumbersome. Anyway, we certainly should not hold past transgressions against anyone, but it seems like PJ has not learned to behave much better in all these years, and I thought some of this might help you if you ever felt the need to escalate matters.— TAnthonyTalk 21:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@TAnthony: I know they have a long history. I was aware of their sock-puppetry, etc. I may escalate matters, I'm currently deciding on how accomplished that would be. I'm weighing the pro's and the con's. In fact, your name has come up in his discussions and his defenses. livelikemusic my talk page! 21:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Click on show to view the contents of this section


Onelifefreak2007

[edit]
Block log •  IP socks

Image block

[edit]
  • Image violation report: [6], [7],[8] (8/19/08)
  • Block for 1 week: [9] (8/19/08)
  • Resolution: [10] (8/19/08)

IP sock

[edit]

Formal 3RR warning

[edit]

3RR block

[edit]
  • 3RR violation report: [11] (9/1/08)
  • Block: [12] (9/2/08)
  • Resolution: [13] (9/2/08)
  • 2nd Block: [14] (9/3/08)

Personal attack warning

[edit]
  • With examples: [15] (9/2/08)
  • Response by Onelifefreak2007: [16] (9/2/08)
  • Clarification of warning: [17] (9/2/08)
  • Subsequent personal attack after re-block for edit-warring, directed at blocking Admin: [18] (9/3/08)

3RR with OLTL2002

[edit]

Miscellaneous

[edit]

December 2008

[edit]

IP sock redux

[edit]

January 2009

[edit]

2nd IP sock

[edit]

3rd IP sock

[edit]

4th IP sock

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Head or Heart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

You know - you guys are actively trying to improve the US soap articles. But every now and then I spot really old bad decisions. But I just spotted the strangest additional (redundant, pointless, exsessive) nav template going. It is Template:OLTL Senior Cast - what do you think about it. I thought it was a joke, until I saw it was not.Rain the 1 19:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Raintheone: I have nothing to do with Nav templates. Certain users have gone overboard with templates, thinking it's helping the website, when in reality, it is not! Sorry for not responding sooner! Busy with work! I think navboxes need to be simplified majorly! livelikemusic my talk page! 00:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Livelikemusic/Talk_Page_Archive_7&oldid=1088763471"