User talk:Criedley

August 2012

Hello, I'm Eeekster. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Farnsley Middle School, because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Eeekster (talk) 00:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Farnsley Middle School was changed by Criedley (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950119 on 2012-08-28T20:40:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 20:47, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Criedley (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked in 2012, when I was 12 years old. I've remained an avid Wiki reader since then and after nearly ten years I would like to try editing on a clean slate. Thank you. Criedley (talk) 07:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Thank you for your reply, I will remove the block. Good luck. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

I am inclined to give you another chance. I assume edits like this will not recur? 331dot (talk) 10:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Absolutely not, I'm an adult now and would like to be participate as a competent editor in the Wikipedia community. I appreciate your understanding. Criedley (talk) 23:21, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Criedley, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! 331dot (talk) 09:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Getting started

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

Finding your way around

• Table of contents
• Directories and indexes
• Department directory

Editing articles

• How to develop an article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help

• Frequently asked questions
• Cheatsheet
• Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
• The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
• Help pages
• Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

• Community Portal
• Join a WikiProject
• Follow Wikipedia etiquette
• Practice civility
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

June 2024

Hi Criedley! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of MF Doom several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:MF Doom, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 14:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Hey, how are you? That is not my preferred version, that is the consensus that was reached on the talk page. The changes I made were to make the article reflect what is stated in MOS:BIOEXCEPT. Criedley (talk) 14:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

I don't see any participation on your part in the discussion on the talk page, but you reverted the edits I made anyways. I am fully aware of the 3RR rule, so yes, I will be using one of the dispute resolution options. Come on over to the talk page and join the discussion! Criedley (talk) 14:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)