User talk:Moosebag10: Difference between revisions
Moosebag10 (talk | contribs) →July 2024 2: Reply |
Moosebag10 (talk | contribs) →July 2024 2: Reply |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
::Best regards, |
::Best regards, |
||
::—[[User:Moosebag10|<span style="color:Aquamarine">'''Moosebag10'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Moosebag10|<span style="color:Aquamarine">'''chatter'''</span>]]) 21:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC) |
::—[[User:Moosebag10|<span style="color:Aquamarine">'''Moosebag10'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Moosebag10|<span style="color:Aquamarine">'''chatter'''</span>]]) 21:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::Thank you for keeping me updated on the ongoing discussion. I appreciate your efforts in ensuring transparency and clarity in this matter. |
|||
:::I'm here to address any concerns or questions that have been raised. Please let me know how I can contribute positively to the discussion and work towards a resolution. |
|||
:::Best regards, |
|||
:::—[[User:Moosebag10|<span style="color:Aquamarine">'''Moosebag10'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Moosebag10|<span style="color:Aquamarine">'''chatter'''</span>]]) 21:33, 16 July 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:33, 16 July 2024
Hello
Meeeee Moosebag10 (chatter) 09:50, 16 July 2024 (EDT)
Welcome!
Hello, Moosebag10, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Bottlenose dolphin did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- This was written by ChatGPT. That is true also and it is accurate.
- Urs Truly,
- —Moosebag10 (chatter) 19:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bottlenose dolphin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:53, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is sourced. A secret source.
- Urs Truly,
- —Moosebag10 (chatter) 19:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Welcome, Moosebag10!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Moosebag10! I'm CFA, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.
You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.
If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.
Again, welcome to Wikipedia! C F A 💬 20:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Dear CFA,
- Thank you so much for the Wikilove cookie and for agreeing to mentor me on Wikipedia. I am truly grateful for this opportunity to learn from your experience and expertise.
- I'm eager to dive deeper into Wikipedia's guidelines and improve my editing skills under your guidance. Your support means a lot to me, and I look forward to our collaboration.
- Best regards,
July 2024
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Cullen328 (talk) 20:53, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comments like
ONE MORE TIME I AM TYING YOU ON A PIÑATA
are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Cullen328 (talk) 20:56, 16 July 2024 (UTC)- Sorry. Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Moosebag10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I believe there may have been a misunderstanding or mistake in the application of the block. I am committed to following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including those related to neutrality, verifiability, and civility. I value the integrity of Wikipedia as a collaborative platform and strive to contribute constructively to its content.
I request an opportunity to discuss the block further and provide any necessary explanations or clarifications. I am eager to resolve any concerns and continue contributing positively to Wikipedia.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I made a silly mistake while editing. I am writing to appeal the block placed on my account. I was recently blocked for disruptive editing, and I am seeking clarification on the specific edits or actions that led to this decision. I believe there may have been a misunderstanding or mistake in the application of the block. I am committed to following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including those related to neutrality, verifiability, and civility. I value the integrity of Wikipedia as a collaborative platform and strive to contribute constructively to its content. I request an opportunity to discuss the block further and provide any necessary explanations or clarifications. I am eager to resolve any concerns and continue contributing positively to Wikipedia. Thank you for your attention to this matter. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I made a silly mistake while editing. I am writing to appeal the block placed on my account. I was recently blocked for disruptive editing, and I am seeking clarification on the specific edits or actions that led to this decision. I believe there may have been a misunderstanding or mistake in the application of the block. I am committed to following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including those related to neutrality, verifiability, and civility. I value the integrity of Wikipedia as a collaborative platform and strive to contribute constructively to its content. I request an opportunity to discuss the block further and provide any necessary explanations or clarifications. I am eager to resolve any concerns and continue contributing positively to Wikipedia. Thank you for your attention to this matter. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I made a silly mistake while editing. I am writing to appeal the block placed on my account. I was recently blocked for disruptive editing, and I am seeking clarification on the specific edits or actions that led to this decision. I believe there may have been a misunderstanding or mistake in the application of the block. I am committed to following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including those related to neutrality, verifiability, and civility. I value the integrity of Wikipedia as a collaborative platform and strive to contribute constructively to its content. I request an opportunity to discuss the block further and provide any necessary explanations or clarifications. I am eager to resolve any concerns and continue contributing positively to Wikipedia. Thank you for your attention to this matter. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- What would you say is wrong with this edit:[1]? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- We do not want to read banalities from ChatGPT or similar software. We want to hear from a human being. Precisely what "silly mistake" did you make and what assurances can you provide that you won't make any more silly mistakes? Venting anger against volunteer editors at the Teahouse (or anywhere else) is not permitted. Cullen328 (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Wikipedia’s,
- Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate your perspective on Pantherpedia and its strengths. It's great to see different platforms contributing positively to knowledge sharing and accessibility.
- While Pantherpedia may excel in certain areas, it's important to recognize that Wikipedia also serves a vast global community with its collaborative editing model and extensive content in multiple languages. Both platforms have their strengths and challenges, and each plays a significant role in the digital landscape.
- I value your insights and look forward to continued discussions on how various platforms can enhance information accessibility and accuracy for users worldwide.
- Best regards and let me by myself,
- —Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Huh? How did you even get ChatGPT to give you this response? Pantherpedia isn't even a thing that exists. C F A 💬 21:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- It exists as a crystal ball. Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- We do not want to read banalities from ChatGPT or similar software. We want to hear from a human being. Precisely what "silly mistake" did you make and what assurances can you provide that you won't make any more silly mistakes? Venting anger against volunteer editors at the Teahouse (or anywhere else) is not permitted. Cullen328 (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
You can be (not "by") yourself, just not at Wikipedia. Persist, and expect the 31 hour block to be converted to an indefinite block. David notMD (talk) 21:21, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nah, I am just spending times here. Thank you for your interest in Pantherpedia. Pantherpedia is an encyclopedia project developed under Panthermedia, headquartered in Miami, Florida (previously Key West until July 13). It has grown to involve over 1,500 users contributing to its content.
- I appreciate the opportunity to clarify this information and look forward to discussing more about Pantherpedia and its contributions.
- Best regards,
- —Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think trolling is going to get you unblocked... C F A 💬 21:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- I wanted to take a moment to clarify why I've been seeking help with writing paragraphs and discussions. Writing cohesively and effectively on Wikipedia has been a challenge for me, especially in conveying my thoughts clearly and within the guidelines of the platform.
- I've found that using an AI-powered assistant like ChatGPT helps me organize my thoughts into coherent paragraphs. It assists me in ensuring that my messages are respectful, informative, and aligned with Wikipedia's standards.
- By utilizing this tool, I aim to contribute constructively to discussions and improve my communication skills on Wikipedia. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to engage with me during this process.
- Thank you for your patience and support.
- Best regards,
- —Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for keeping me updated on the ongoing discussion. I appreciate your efforts in ensuring transparency and clarity in this matter.
- I'm here to address any concerns or questions that have been raised. Please let me know how I can contribute positively to the discussion and work towards a resolution.
- Best regards,
- —Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:33, 16 July 2024 (UTC)