User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:59, 21 September 2007

File:WikipediaSignpost icon.png You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Piotrus/Archive 18. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you.

Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.

Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you.

DYK (24 August)

Did you know? was updated. On 24 August, 2007, a fact from the article Jakub Karol Parnas, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Open Source Directory

PreTender submitted eve-wiki to the CCP fansite list months ago and I've tried again and also on the Open Directory project. Can you help?
Leave me a message at eve-wiki.net —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alatari (talk • contribs) 04:54, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the note at our notice board. Good stuff. --Poeticbent talk 00:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About your pictures from Baranów Sand. castle

Dear Piotr:

Hi! We do not meet from time ago. Congratulations for your gallery in commons.

I took advantage of your pictures in Baranów Sandomierski castle. You may see the results in w:commons:Category:Coats of arms of families of Poland in Baranow-Sandomierski castle Your work is excellent, do not you wish to include this images in your gallery? As you can see the credit remains all yours. Be free to change or to delete whatever you want.

By the way, in w:commons:Image:Baranów Sandomierski - castle 16.JPG I could identify Herb Wieniawa easily but I am not sure about the other three ones. I suppose they are woj. Sandomierskie (the stripes and the stars), woj. Rawskie (the crowned black eagle) and woj. Rúskie (the crowned lion), but I am not sure. Do you know something about?

Best regards my friend.

--Gustavo 02:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Piotr:

I do know you are busy, but I need some help with the Polish language. I already included your photos in the Polish coats of arms of the en:wiki. Now I would like to do the same thing in the pl:wiki.

I presume that, as an example, "Wawdicz coat of arms in Baranow-Sandomierski castle" is "Herb Wawdicz w zamku Baranowie Sandomierkie" but I am not sure. May you tell me? Remember that my Polish is worst than my English. Imaging!

Thank you and best regards.

--Gustavo 07:24, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nguyen-ngoc-truong-son.jpg

Witaj. Czy mógłbyś przyjrzeć się tej fotce? Chciałem załadować na commons, ale w Internecie to zdjęcie bez problemu można znaleźć [1] i mam spore wątpliwości, czy jest to {{PD-self}} (a może się mylę?). Pozdrawiam pjahr 12:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 15 September, 2007, a fact from the article Kościół św. Anny, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 05:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops

Monobook in tools cat - apologies and thanks for the heads up, done --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warsaw

Someone calling himself Bg007 probably demolished an article about Warsaw. I don't know how to repair it. Could you help me, please? Polaco77 08:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia weekly interview

Hi there, I noticed that you are an extremly high contributor to FA and was wondering if you would like to be interviewed for an upcoming episode of Wikipedia Weekly? I would be interested in talking about why you are involved in WP, what areas are you specifically involved in, the Polish wikipedia community and their specific issues. Does this sound interesting? I hope to hear from you soon. Witty Lama 12:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we record over Skype so you would need that program and a headset microphone. I'm fairly flexible with times but I'm in Australia (10 hours ahead of polish time I believe). Is tomorrow (sunday) ok? Witty Lama 17:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I worked out that I'm 8 hours ahead of Polish time (if you are indeed in Poland), so 10:00 Sunday for you is 18:00 Sunday for me. If you can be available for half an hour that's fine. I'll see you there! What's your skype name? Witty Lama 01:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so if you're in eastern US 10am would mean midnight for me. That's ok for me. Are you up for that - 10am sunday Eastern US time? Witty Lama 05:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Has it happened yet? The lama should have paired you with Ghirla.....well, we need take #2. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Ep is now up and going. Enjoy. Witty Lama 06:19, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK: Kazimierz Palace

Did you know? was updated. On 15 September, 2007, a fact from the article Kazimierz Palace, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks! --PFHLai 14:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

defenders of nippon

Hello there, I was looking through Katsuhiro Otomo's filmography, and noticed a new entry, namely "defenders of nippon". From the history of the page, I believe you added that, so I'm wondering where you got that info and if you have a source. Thanks in advance! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.206.62 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are mistaken, I did not add this; I only ilinked one of his works. You may want to read Help:Page history and practice more with the relevant tools to find out the editor who added that info.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 19:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 16 September, 2007, a fact from the article Urszula Mayerin, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--D_arkF_alls ^talk 05:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On September 17, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cult of the offensive, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks again Piotrus. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:46, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Historiography

You might be interested in Soviet historiography, which I recently stubbed and (possibly foolishly) tagged into {{WPSU}}. Digwuren 18:15, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

eve wiki

hi ive set up a wiki for my corporation on the eve wiki sit but im a bit of a noob and cant link it 2 the correct catagory (pc corps) i think it should meet the standerd but no doubt my corpmates will wish 2 c*ap all over my hard work and edit it as they see fit so if it isnt plz dont flag it for delition right away thanks MURDAH/Scivi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.150.63 (talk) 03:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Space Cadet is in troubles

Hi, I think you might be interested in this Space Cadet in troubles. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 13:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Front page day is pudding day

Oh, dear, the lead is turning into a pudding. This is a perfect example of how articles deteriorate. Someone adds a superfluous detail to the lead ("several calls to do so"). Someone else decides, without reading the rest of the article, where that point is expanded and referenced, to add a "citation needed" tag. Someone else comes along and helpfully references the point, adding all sorts of other details too, just to nail it home, without taking into account the need for a sense of proportion in the lead or the fact that all this is already covered and referenced in the body of the article. And the lead now says that the Soviets delayed because Warsaw hadn't yet fallen, whereas the body of the article gives a number of reasons from a range of sources. I don't think I'll try and sort this out until after the 24 hours, because good concise prose in the lead is a fine art and cannot be attempted while swatting flies, with one foot in a swamp. This experience convinces me that maybe it's best to cite everything in the lead in future: some people obviously don't realise that it's a deliberate style choice not to cite too much in the lead, particularly those people who start editing the lead before they've read the whole article. :(. qp10qp 15:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 38	17 September 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: Reader survey
Wikimedia treasurer expected to depart soon	WikiWorld comic: "Sarah Vowell"
News and notes: Template standardization, editing patterns, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Czyński

Hello Piotrus. My Polish being effectively non-existent, can you tell me if pl:Jan Czyński was in Paris in the 1830s. I assume so - "great emigration" I did understand. I'm trying to figure out if he is the person who co-authored a book called Le Roi des Paysans (published in Paris in 1838). My Belgian source calls this person Jean Czynski. Many thanks in advance! Angus McLellan (Talk) 08:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colour me impressed! Thanks for that. Trawling through the BNF catalogue has confirmed that he was indeed my Jean Czynski. Thanks again and all the best, Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 19 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Piłsudski's Mound, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 19:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GAC

What a refreshing thought.[2] --Poeticbent talk 02:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of respect for WP:UE

That where real disruptions lies. M0RD00R 18:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kiev

Just renominate it - and I think you might title the nomination Kiev 2 - there should be details on the page.--daniel folsom 01:57, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enlightenment Template

Hi! Terribly sorry to spam you, but, remembering your interest in the Template:Enlightenment, I thought you might be interested to know that I have started a discussion on the inclusion criteria; it would be great if you came over to Template talk:Enlightenment to take part. --AVIosad^(talk) 13:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 282: / Line 282: @@
 ==Kiev==
 Just renominate it - and I think you might title the nomination Kiev 2 - there should be details on the page.--<small>[[User:Danielfolsom|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">daniel]][[User_talk:Danielfolsom|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">folsom]]</span></span></small> 01:57, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
+== Enlightenment Template ==
+Hi! Terribly sorry to spam you, but, remembering your interest in the [[Template:Enlightenment]], I thought you might be interested to know that I have started a discussion on the inclusion criteria; it would be great if you came over to [[Template talk:Enlightenment]] to take part. --[[User:AVIosad|AVIosad]]<sup>([[User talk:AVIosad|talk]])</sup> 13:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)