Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/Alexia Death: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 64: Line 64:
# Nope. --[[User:Folantin|Folantin]] 09:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
# Nope. --[[User:Folantin|Folantin]] 09:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
# [[User:Shem|Shem]]<sup>[[User talk:Shem|(talk)]]</sup> 09:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
# [[User:Shem|Shem]]<sup>[[User talk:Shem|(talk)]]</sup> 09:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
#--[[User:Mcginnly|Mcginnly]] | [[User talk:Mcginnly|Natter]] 09:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:55, 3 December 2007

Please Note: Comments longer than two short sentences will be moved to the talk page.

Alexia Death

:I have a recent ArbCom ruling about me. The case in itself gave me an introspect on what ArbCom tries do be and where it fails. At this moment, the process(not the people) of ArbCom is faulty and conflicting with Wikipedia ideology in many ways. One of those is the concept of prevention over punishment. It is not prevention when you slap everybody around and simply ignore the root issues that make problems like this come to ArbCom again and again. People who end up at ArbCom are all dedicated editors, but they need to be told what is acceptable and what is not, not blocked or restricted for long periods. A month block or an actual enforcement of WP:CIVIL policy at the right time can save a lot of trouble for everybody later without actually driving anybody away. Another part of it is passing judgment and showing involvement on ANY issue raised. My case showed that inconvenient issues were simply ignored, motions looked over without a single comment etc. People who end up at ArbCom need somebody to judge and to pass judgment with authority. I wish to bring that change. Thank you. Alexia Death the Grey 07:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have withdrawn my candidacy due to real life issues and other projects taking up most of my time, and I do not wish to waste anyones time. To be quite honest, I never expected to win. Rather, my candidacy was an attempt to make people think about quick fixes and permanent solutions. I thank everybody who voted for me, your agreement with my ideas shows that sanity has not gone out of the world. Those who voted against me, I hope you will find something in my ideas that you can support, if a more deserving person steps forward, because I do believe they hold the key for a better Wikipedia. --Alexia Death the Grey (talk) 09:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. --U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 01:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Part of the problem rather than the solution I think. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. spryde | talk 00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. BLACKKITE 00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose. Massive history of block-shopping at ANI and IRC against content opponents alone is more than enough. --Irpen 00:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Icestorm815 00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Tim Q. Wells 00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Chaz Beckett 00:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose Awfully new. Has experienced WP largely as a disputant. (my fuller vote explanations) -- Jd2718 00:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Too new This is a Secret account 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Nufy8 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Nishkid64 (talk) 00:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hell no.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Not enough experience. Snowolf How can I help? 00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  — master sonT - C 00:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. – Gurch (talk) 00:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. east.718 at 00:34, December 3, 2007
  18. Mr.Z-man 00:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. - auburnpilot talk 00:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. No. - Jehochman Talk 00:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Nick 00:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Prolog 00:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. ~ Riana ⁂ 00:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. — iridescent 00:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Oppose -- Avi 01:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oppose Miranda 01:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Coredesat 01:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  M2Ys4U (talk) 01:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cryptic 01:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Alexfusco5 02:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Stephen 02:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mike H. Celebrating three years of being hotter than Paris 02:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Too new.Zocky | picture popups 02:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Too new. Rebecca 02:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Oppose Thatcher131 02:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Húsönd 02:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 02:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Mercury 03:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. KTC 03:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Sorry. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Oppose -Dureo 03:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Oppose. Mbisanz 03:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 04:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  45. JayHenry 04:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  46. — xaosflux Talk 04:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Spebi 04:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  48. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 05:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  49. ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 05:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  50. TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 06:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  52. - Crockspot 07:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Davewild 08:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sorry. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 08:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Arbitrators should not have rulings against them. DrKiernan 08:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  56. By the time you're at ArbCom, you've already been told what's unacceptable, and chosen to ignore it over and over. Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Nope. --Folantin 09:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Shem(talk) 09:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  59. --Mcginnly | Natter 09:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2007/Vote/Alexia_Death&oldid=175450492"