User talk:Charmed36: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:07, 17 February 2008

December 2005

Welcome!

Hello Charmed36, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Q Q 20:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And I

Watch out for this article. User:Extraordinary Machine is trying to destroy this article and only give the song a two line mention in Goodies). I have reverted this, but he could attempt it again. I thought I'd let you know since you have made excellent contributins to this article. Q Q 20:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Track listings for Mariah Carey albums

Thanks for filling them in! I've been meaning to do that for a while, but never got around to it for some reason. Extraordinary Machine 00:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

January 2006

Goodies (album)

Hello, If you wish to make a comment about an article's content, please do so in the talk page. Where (talk) 00:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February 2006

So Lonely

Santa Claus Is Comin' to Town was Mariah's last single. -- getcrunk juice ^contribs 23:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Underneath the Stars, Honey (song), Mariah Carey

"O Holy Night" was released as a promo-only radio single in late 1996. Also, about Mariah Carey: you're not supposed to replace free-licensed images with non-free ones, see Wikipedia:Fair use criteria. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 16:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've removed "Till the End of Time" from the chronology on Make It Happen without explanation, when it was a promotional single in Central America. Please explain. Extraordinary Machine 22:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2006

Image:Torch.jpg

This is not the album cover. This album was forever shelved. I don't think the band or label ever released cover art. home made, photoshop? (Xm2631 22:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Ciara

Please return Ciara's articles so I can add more information or I will created them again

Pussycat Dolls

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- getcrunk juice ^contribs 23:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop deliberately introducing incorrect information into articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- getcrunk juice ^contribs 19:00, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Emancipation of Mimi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Emancipation of Mimi.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 22:17, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 2006

Image copyright problem with Image:24play1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:24play1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sue Anne 05:00, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charmed, the source on the image page says that you took it from a geocities page. That page [1] clearly states that all the images are copyright by Rhythm Records. That would make the picture unfree and not useable on wikipedia without a free use justification. Sue Anne 03:31, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:You .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:You .jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. --Nivus^(talk) 09:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May 2006

License tagging for Image:Skjermbilde12nq.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Skjermbilde12nq.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Go_Deep_Video.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Go_Deep_Video.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:55, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ciara

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Ciara. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Yamla 21:17, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Gtigvid1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gtigvid1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:00, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Throb" article

Please don't create a new article as a "placeholder" before adding content. Take your time and wait until you have enough info to write at least a stub. Happy editing! Alex (t) 03:30, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Soagvid1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Soagvid1.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:07, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Taremixvid3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Taremixvid3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tavid1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tavid1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beyonce

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test of deliberately adding incorrect information worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- getcrunk juice ^contribs 23:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite

Your changes to the Ciara article were reverted. You must WP:CITE additions such as this. --Yamla 01:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You said: "Why was the information I included to Ciara's article REMOVED? This is unfair. It is correct. Every time I add information to an article, I'm always putting wrong information."

As I pointed out to you, you must cite your additions. --Yamla 19:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't place the Check on It song as Pop as it's not. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup}

Serious image copyright problems

This account has a history of uploading images without specifying the source or copyright information. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Please do not upload any further images unless you are willing to correctly specify both the source and copyright. --Yamla 01:10, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you are still uploading a huge number of images without specifying an accurate source or without including the mandatory detailed fair-use rationale for every use of the copyrighted images. Please be more careful! --Yamla 20:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 2006

List of Beyoncé songs

I redirected it to Beyoncé Knowles discography because the article just repeats all the information that is already present in her discography article, and it doesn't make sense to have two articles about the same thing. I started a discussion at Talk:Beyoncé Knowles, and it was agreed that the article is unnecessary. If you believe that the article is necessary, you can discuss why at Talk:Beyoncé Knowles. --Musicpvm 22:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um, no, I am not watching you. You redirected 1, 2 Step (the correct grammatical title of the song) to 1,2 Step (an incorrect title), so I fixed that. --Musicpvm 22:21, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You know, you can use the "history" button to see previous versions of pages? They are not gone. Click here for the version of 1,2 Step before it was redirected. If you want to add any of that material to 1, 2 Step, go ahead, but please do not redirect the article to an incorrect title. --Musicpvm 22:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ciara

You said: "I put a citing source beside chart positions on Ciara's singles. There is no need to put a stub saying it needs a source."

Yes, but the citation does not cite the chart positions listed. It only cites a very small minority of them. --Yamla 22:42, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please STOP removing the notverified tag in the article on Ciara. --Yamla 19:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never Too Far

Please don't undo my edits without discussion or explanation. With the length the article is at the moment, it just looks messy to have both a music video screencap and the infobox. Extraordinary Machine 21:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, about Butterfly (Mariah Carey song): 1) it peaked at #16 on the Hot 100 Airplay and b) make sure you link to the right article, e.g. gospel music and not gospel. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 21:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't appear to be a Billboard chart; see [2] for Billboard chart positions. Extraordinary Machine 22:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July 2006

Infobox single templates

Please do not replace infobox single templates with raw code. The templates should be used on articles for several reasons. The code for the template occupies less space and is more organized and is in turn easier to edit. Also, when changes are made to the actual template, the changes appear on all the articles that use the template. If the templates are replaced with raw code, the changes will not appear in these articles and the single infoboxes will not be consistent with other single infoboxes. --musicpvm 23:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jennifer-lopez-09 (2).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jennifer-lopez-09 (2).jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 19:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Call on Me

Hi, you keep removing the fact that "Call on Me" has hit number nine in Japan according to the Tokio Hot 100. Many other singles on Wikipedia use this chart as the peak position in Japan. For example, We Belong Together. Please stop randomly changing this without explanation. Thankyoubaby 21:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ciara

You said: "Were you the one that removed Ciara's And I single cover because it is gone and for what reach if you did it?"

Yes. The image was orphaned. However, the fundamental problem was that the image was missing the detailed fair-use rationale required by the license. All copyrighted images require a source (which identifies the copyright holder), an accurate license, and a detailed fair-use rationale for every use of the image on the Wikipedia. --Yamla 20:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Get Up.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Get Up.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yamla 00:49, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:And I.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:And I.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yamla 00:49, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for continuing to upload copyrighted images without specifying the mandatory information. --Yamla 00:49, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You sent me an email asking why you were blocked. As noted here, you were blocked for continuing to upload copyrighted images without specifying the mandatory information. In the most recent case, you once again left out the mandatory detailed fair-use rationale. --Yamla 04:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationales

ALL COPYRIGHTED IMAGES NEED A DETAILED FAIR-USE RATIONALE JUSTIFYING THEIR USE. Just adding the license is not sufficient. Please do not add any more images without the detailed fair-use rationale. --Yamla 04:08, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You said: "This image qualifies as fair use because it is a legitimate cover of the album Design of a Decade 1986/1996. It was released in Japan with the international tracklisting."

Please see here for more information on how to add a detailed fair-use rationale. Note that you must justify each specific article you are using the copyrighted image in. Also, the rationale generally goes on the image page, not the discussion page. Also, you need to sign the rationale. Thanks! --Yamla 04:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How to sign

You can sign your comments by adding --~~~~ at the end of your message. That is, two minus signs and four tildes. --Yamla 04:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationales

Hi! Thanks for adding fair use rationales to images. Two things to point out: you can remove the "fair use is disputed" tag when you add a rationale; and please also change the record label for album covers. And there's a typo in #1 (it says "am" instead of "an"). Thanks — getcrunk what?! 16:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 2006

Image tagging for Image:Ciaragetupvid.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ciaragetupvid.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Beyoncebdaypromo.jpg not a screenshot

Please, update the image tag for Image:Beyoncebdaypromo.jpg. {{musicpromo-screenshot}} is for music videos screenshots, and that image doesn't seems one. If I'm wrong, please, let me know. Best regards, --Abu Badali 00:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really a promotional image? I mean, does it comes from a press kit or something similar? We need to be sure of that in order to use the {{promotional}} tag. The source given (the "Bootylicious Beyoncé" site) doesn't seems as the original source for this artist's promotional material. --Abu Badali 01:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's the site I got the promo picture from. It is a promo pic, but Sony must have released it. Charmed36 3 September 2006 (UTC)

And how can we be sure it's a promotional image if all we knew so far is that it's displayed on Bootylicious? --Abu Badali 01:36, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many sites have the same promo picture. I got it from that one.

Charmed36 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Many sites have copyright violations. If we can't be sure it's a promotional image, we can't use the {{promotional}} tag. --Abu Badali 01:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The webmaster says on the site, "I've added a new B'Day promo picture. Click on the image to check it out." [[3]] [[4]]

The point is: Is bootyliciou's webmaster a reliable source? Can we take bootyliciou's webmaster's word for thruth? Does bootyliciou's site cares about copyright just as much as Wikipedia does? Does them provide the source for the image's they use?

You could, though, mail bootyliciou's webmaster and ask him what's the original source for that photo. --Abu Badali 01:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

B'Day

Please? I'll remove the release date(s) of the album as often as I consider it as necessary, because: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums#Details (by the way) ...

Re: Britney Spears

OK, In The Zone has some urban-oriented songs, but it doesn't make her a urban music singer. Madonna also had some R&B-influenced albums but it also doesn't make her an R&B singer. Funk Junkie 22:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? Have you got any sources? Funk Junkie 22:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK so, let's keep it like this for some time while we haven't got reliable sources. Funk Junkie 22:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Get Up

You asked: "Why was the image removed from Ciara's [[Get Up (Ciara song) article?"

Which image? Image:Ciaragetupvid.jpg? As stated on the image page, it was not being used to provide critical commentary on the music video, nor was there a mandatory detailed fair-use rationale justifying its use. --Yamla 22:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naughty Girl and Naughty Girl (Beyoncé song)

Please never move pages by cutting and pasting the content into a new title. Pages should only be moved by using the "Move" tab at the top of each page.
You may not have been aware of it, but Wikipedia has its own style guide described in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Please try to follow its advice. Edits that do not follow these guidelines may be changed to match what the WP:MOS recommends. Wikipedia does not require writers to follow all or any of these rules, but their efforts will be more appreciated when they do so.
Currently, many articles still contain links to Naughty Girl, when those links should be changed to Naughty Girl (Beyoncé song). When you move an article to another title and create a disambiguation page at the article's original location, you should correct any links leading to the disambiguation page so that they lead to the correct page. See Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Links_to_disambiguated_topics.
I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! Extraordinary Machine 14:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 2006

Get Up (Ciara song)

Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 17:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Preview

I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Geniac 00:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:CiaraTheEvolution.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CiaraTheEvolution.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 14:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for 48 hours for continuing to upload images without providing the mandatory information required. --Yamla 14:14, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beyonce

Hey, are you also getting annoyed with Funk Junkie (talk · contribs)? He seems to have absolutlely no understanding of genres. It is fact that Beyonce is a pop musician, and he keeps removing the pop genre from her article and from the "Naughty Girl" and "Check on It" articles. --musicpvm 16:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:T63102u2zxf.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:T63102u2zxf.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for seven days for continuing to remove tags from images without resolving the underlying problem. You've been warned about this several times and most recently removed the no-rationale tag from Image:T63102u2zxf.jpg without providing a detailed fair-use rationale for the use of that image. You are welcome to resume editing once the block expires but we cannot have you continue to remove tags from images. This puts Wikipedia at direct risk of copyright infringement litigation. --Yamla 20:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 2006

I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Geniac 13:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

Please stop changing the Pussycat Dolls genres. After discussion we agreed on them and you are vandalising --JJH1992

PCD

No after a discussion we agreed the genres i put in were correct. So leave them be. Consider this a warning or I will request you be blocked. --JJH1992

Re: And I

Sorry for the late reply. I personally consider "And I" a pop song – it's got that acoustic guitar-driven sound, you know? But I'm not sure as well. Funk Junkie 16:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 2006

You're Wrong

Ciara Has said although there is a video for get up it isn't a promo single for the evolution it is for the step up soundtrack and who are you to delete me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :( :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ciara The Evolution (talk • contribs) 18:31, December 1, 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:1302nsns.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:1302nsns.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 15:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Goodies Japan Cover .jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Goodies Japan Cover .jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

I've told you plenty of times to leave PCD's genres alone. Nobody wants your constant changing so quit it. I'm going to find a way to request you be blocked —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JJH1992 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

your incredibly pathetic and childish — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJH1992 (talk • contribs) 16:54, December 8, 2006 (UTC)

Re: LoveStoned

The reasons I nominated the LoveStoned article for deletion are a) it didn't cite it sources, which means it violates the "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball" policy, and b) every time I redirected it to the FutureSex/LoveSounds article, I was reverted. There's no point merging the article if isn't sourced to begin with and the redirect will be undone anyway. Hope you understand. Extraordinary Machine 13:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pcdwaitaminute.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pcdwaitaminute.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ciara: The Evolution

The article is certainly not perfect. The whole idea behind Wikipedia is that users collaborate to improve articles. As far as the information that I removed, it constitutes original research unless a source can be provided. —ShadowHalo 02:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If the meaning of the title is correct, then you need to be able to provide a source. I suggest you read Wikipedia:Verifiability, which states "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth". As far as having lots of people edit an article, I strongly suggest that you read Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. "If you don't want your material to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it." —ShadowHalo 03:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found a source for the title. The second sentence is a bit general, so I have my doubts that it'll be possible to find one, and it is probably best removed. —ShadowHalo 03:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

reverting

I spent along time organising Britneys genres, and you revert them, for the simple reason of p'ing me off. You are terribly pathetic. Get a life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJH1992 (talk • contribs) 15:08, February 7, 2007 (UTC)

March 2007

Rich Girl (Gwen Stefani song)

I'm quite confused as to why you changed the genre to reggae from its more specific subgenre ragga. In fact, reggae would appear to be less factually accurate considering reggae doesn't really take into account the song's dancehall influence. If you disagree, you may want to comment on the talk page. ShadowHalo 01:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your change to Luxurious for the same reason. Just saying R&B fails to take into account the influence of hip hop (new jack swing is the fusion genre of R&B and hip hop). ShadowHalo 00:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Chiara & Company

OK. I have no expertise whatsoever in this field, which is why I made only a careful redirect. Please do not be offended - I appreciate that you are expert in this area - but please could you briefly indicate what it is that makes this article a hoax? I can then delete it.--Anthony.bradbury 09:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

4 in the Morning

Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article 4 in the Morning are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! ShadowHalo 23:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Non-free use disputed for Image:VelvetRopeTour.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:VelvetRopeTour.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 19:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shut Up and Drive

Please do not add Category:2000s pop songs or Category:2007 songs to Shut Up and Drive. Category:Rihanna songs is a subcategory of Category:2000s pop songs and Category:2007 singles is a subcategory of Category:2007 songs, so the article was already in both of those categories. ShadowHalo 18:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Drmvid1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Drmvid1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 21:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Escapadevid1.jpg

I have tagged Image:Escapadevid1.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 21:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Escapadevid4.jpg

I have tagged Image:Escapadevid4.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 21:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Everytimevid.jpg

I have tagged Image:Everytimevid.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 21:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Invitation

I'd like to invite you to join the WikiProject R&B and Soul Music. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 13:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

I had no idea I removed the template, sorry about that, I'll fix it immediately. As for the "2006 songs" cat, I thought that you only put that category for articles on songs (not singles), as the song is now a single. By that I mean, articles on songs that were not singles, but were notable enough to have a Wiki article, so that is a different category for non-singles. --- Realest4Life 00:29, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strange, I checked the history, and I didn't find myself removing any 2000s single stub thing. --- Realest4Life 00:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see nothing about pop songs being removed by me, show me the diff please. --- Realest4Life 15:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --- Realest4Life 15:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect formatting. --- Realest4Life 15:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's Right

Hi there. I have no idea about whether "That's Right" is a single for the whole of Europe. So-Urban.com is the UK Urban web site from her record label so it will definitely be released as the next UK single.

Have no idea about the cover, I presume it's homemade as the single has only just been announced for the UK.

"Get Up" was released as a download single in the UK to promote Step Up last October but due to chart rules at the time a CD had to be issued for the song to chart, therefore the song was unable to chart. This year it was re-released with the Kardinal Beats remix but radio did not pick up the song a second time around and it was released as a download only single again but COULD chart (due to chart rules allowing download only songs to chart) but due to lack of airplay/video play/promo it didn't chart... so I guess that's why they're following it up quickly here! No CD release for "Get Up" has happened, twice!

I hope that makes sense... if you've got any more questions feel free to ask!

TopopMAC1

Source

Good job, finally someone is actually smart enough to source the chart positions. Keep up the good work. --- Realest4Life 15:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:224.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:224.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 09:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Widvid2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Widvid2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

We can at least mention the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart. That chart is pretty important as well. --- Realest4Life 15:44, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Wnvid4.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wnvid4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Afyvid1.jpg

I have tagged Image:Afyvid1.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 21:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Againvid3.jpg

I have tagged Image:Againvid3.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 21:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alrightvid1.jpg

I have tagged Image:Alrightvid1.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 22:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bcvid4.jpg

I have tagged Image:Bcvid4.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:21, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bolvid3.jpg

I have tagged Image:Bolvid3.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cbtmvid4.jpg

I have tagged Image:Cbtmvid4.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 04:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Runawayvid.jpg

I have tagged Image:Runawayvid.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 04:03, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ywtvid5.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ywtvid5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 04:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Iglvid4.jpg

I have tagged Image:Iglvid4.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 04:06, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gdvid1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gdvid1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 04:06, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Afyvid1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Afyvid1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 04:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Soagvid.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Soagvid.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 04:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jalwvid4.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jalwvid4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 04:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wigbvid4.jpg

I have tagged Image:Wigbvid4.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 04:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tfvid1.jpg

I have tagged Image:Tfvid1.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 12:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gwen Stefani albums

I've removed Category:Interscope Records albums from both the Love. Angel. Music. Baby. and The Sweet Escape articles. Since all of her albums were released on Interscope, Category:Gwen Stefani albums should be (and already was) in Category:Interscope Records albums, not the individual articles. 17Drew 04:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ciaracantleaveemalone2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ciaracantleaveemalone2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cantleaveemalone.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cantleaveemalone.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:82.19.9.136

It looks like Yamla got your message and blocked the IP. In the future, you should probably use a warning template to warn the user when a vandalism issue like this happens. 17Drew 00:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly what Drew said. Luxurious.gaurav 10:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wasnt vandilising, I just posted a screenshot from the video. D: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Animedudde (talk • contribs) 23:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ciara in Dance-pop

FYI -- Ciara is NOT a Dance-pop artist, nor is "1, 2 Step" a Dance-pop song. She's an R&B artist that has a few danceable tracks, but that does NOT make her a Dance-pop artist. Mirror Ball

Get Up by Ciara?

You have yet to really explain why that belongs listed as a dance-pop song. Just because it's uptempo and danceable, doesn't make it dance-pop per se. I like the song and all, but I don't think it classifies as dance-pop. Mirror Ball

Get Up change

Much better. Ciara is so good, she deserves a newer categorization. She's the queen of crunk/hop after all. "1, 2 Step" IS Dance-pop though, so you were right about that one and I was really wrong (and dumb). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwmalone (talk • contribs) 20:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: I'm a Slave 4 U

Urban pop sounds way better. Britney Spears has a few urban-tinged songs, but it's not really R&B. Maybe contemporary R&B, but not rhythm and blues. Funk Junkie 22:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cant leave em alone Ciara chart success

hello, i dont mean to bother you by editing the chart section, but the only reason i do so is because questioning your resoning on what makes a successful single.

reaching 40 on Billboard whilst not the greatest achievement to some artists, cannot surely be deamed by everyone as 'unsuccessful'. its 40 out of a hundred.

Look at all other posts on other artists singles some of which have even failed to chart, in those articles there is NO OPINION from the editor about the success or failure of those single because chart information should contain facts not opinions, it is up to the reader to judge and see if its 'success' or not.

So where is the cutoff for a single being successful? top 30? top 20? top 10? top 5? see it clearly presents problems.

Furthermore you wrote that the single did reach the top 10 rnb billboard charts, so how does this still make it an unsuccssesful single?

think about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinite (talk • contribs) 09:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Beyonceirreplaceablesingle.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Beyonceirreplaceablesingle.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BritandBeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 04:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just recently uploaded new cover for Irreplaceable, which i think, the Single's cover, this image above is a maxi cover. If you want to verify it, see the source I provided. if its not right, kindly change. Thanks. BritandBeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 03:03, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blackout (Britney Spears album)

My apologies. I only checked the reference next to the word Duration, so I assumed the lengths were coming from there. The source doesn't, however, include the songwriters and producers (though the ones from "Gimme More" probably don't need to be sourced since they're on the single for it). Is there a reliable source that has that information? 17Drew 01:46, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blackout Info

It's no longer relevant and it was just a rumor to begin with, the source wasn't credible either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thankssir (talk • contribs) 19:51, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing about the user who deliberately changed cover which is apparently a fake one. That user is curently blocked. BritandBeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 03:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up on the fake cover. I'll keep an eye on it, and I'm sure others will too... I see the comment above states the user has been blocked already, which is good :-) - eo 11:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What did you say? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thankssir (talk • contribs) 19:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't remove anything about her personal life. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thankssir (talk • contribs) 21:59, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey thanks for pointing out my mistake on Like a Boy. I read most of the article and glanced a few times and didn't notice the last section about tattoos. Thanks! Spigot Map 02:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Blackstreetgirlfriendboyfriendcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Blackstreetgirlfriendboyfriendcover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --βandβ ^{(talk•contribs)} 10:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like a Boy

The two sentences have been deleted as the information is incorrect, please don't restore to the version with the two sentences.

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! The Helpful One ^(Talk)^{(Contributions)} 18:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Janet-Jackson-Black-Cat-309971.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Janet-Jackson-Black-Cat-309971.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Janet-Jackson-I-Get-Lonely-109007.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Janet-Jackson-I-Get-Lonely-109007.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JanetJacksonIf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JanetJacksonIf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JanetJacksonThrob.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JanetJacksonThrob.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Janetanytimeanyplace1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Janetanytimeanyplace1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AllForYouTour.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AllForYouTour.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Internet Explorer Wallpaper (2).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Internet Explorer Wallpaper (2).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mymvid6.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mymvid6.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lwndwyvid6.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lwndwyvid6.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Gwen Stefani

I'm not really familiar with Gwen's overall music style but I'll see what I can do. Funk Junkie (talk) 17:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Charmed36. I took a look at the genre changing.... one in particular seems to be ok (power-pop) but I would definitely question indie or glam. I checked the article talk page however and I don't see any conversation about this, nor do I see any communication on Blah's User Talk Page. Has anyone written to him about his edits and/or tried to attempt a consensus? Perhaps a hidden editor's note can be placed in the genre field of Stefani's infobox and a discussion can be opened up in the article talk page. If Blah was placing obviously disruptive genres there, like country or opera or rap that would be one thing but I only see edits from this user from January 3, so it may be a simple case of Blah being new and not realizing his edits are questionable. - eo (talk) 16:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

No, since your userpage has nothing in it you have no need for it. Marlith 18:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello Charmed36, I noticed this edit summary. I'd like to kindly remind you not to insult other editors, whether they are a vandal, a editor who's been here for some time, or a newcomer. Thanks! Acalamari 00:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't apologize to me. It's just a reminder, that's all. Acalamari 02:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Twenty Foreplay.jpg

I have tagged Image:Twenty Foreplay.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 16:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shut Up and Drive

Per this edit, I think that winning an award for Best R&B Song qualifies it as R&B. If you look on the People's Choice Awards site, you can see for yourself (if you don't mind the awful flash navigation). Dookama (talk) 08:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to response to, hmm. I can source the assertion that it is R&B by citing an award it received. Can you find substantial sources saying that the song isn't R&B? Dookama (talk) 08:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Whoopsnow cover7.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Whoopsnow cover7.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

Before this edit war gets any worse, I strongly suggest you source the genres if you don't want them removed. If the editor/IP changes a genre without a source, warnings can be given. I've also warned the other person from using IPs to edit war. Thanks. Spellcast (talk) 22:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure they were. But if you want your edits to stay in the long-term, simply give a ref for the genres and the other person can't do anything about it. Spellcast (talk) 22:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know the user is using IPs and I'll block the account if s/he continues using them. But both of you aren't giving refs to support your genres. Surely it can't be hard to source it. Spellcast (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even i am fed up this genre fight. Something has to be done about it before it gets worse. Let us sit one day and source all the genres. This will shut them up. Indianescence (talk) 05:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

S/he was blocked for 24 hours. I'll still keep an eye out though, thanks. Spellcast (talk) 20:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's the person I blocked. I've got lots of Gwen Stefani songs watchlisted, so I'll be watching the edits. Spellcast (talk) 20:39, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jenniferlopezbravev5bw0.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jenniferlopezbravev5bw0.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The genres

I know, and if necessary, the pages can all be protected, but "Wikipedia administrators" did not ask for the genres to remain the same, and I had to remove that. Acalamari 04:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but putting in hidden text saying that Wikipedia administrators object to the genre change won't help, as the user will ignore it and remove it. If this keeps up, the pages can be protected from sockpuppet attacks, which is what this user is doing: using sockpuppets to change the genres. I myself have blocked at least two of the user's socks. Acalamari 04:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, and s/he is currently dong edits...i am reverting them and trying to explain him/her through edit summaries. Indianescence (talk) 17:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No idea of this person, but these are clearly fan influenced edits. I am starting n discussion on Talk page of Gwen Stefani. See you there. Indianescence (talk) 17:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Charmed, feel free to comment at Talk:Gwen Stefani#Music genres where a consensus will hopefully be reached. Spellcast (talk) 08:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Get Up

Yes, "Get Up" was released in Canada. I live in Canada... =) 22:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thebestthingsinlifearefreesinglecover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thebestthingsinlifearefreesinglecover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Whatllido.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Whatllido.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That Chick album cover

Why you keep changing the right album cover with the fan made image?! Read "That Chick" discussion before changing the album cover! —Preceding unsigned comment added by F9o0oly (talk • contribs) 22:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tavid1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tavid1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stcmlvid2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stcmlvid2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Article improvements

Hey Charmed.... I checked out all of these Ciara articles and quite frankly all three of them are already in pretty decent shape. I think the best thing you can do is put them up for nomination to allow other editors to check them out and make suggestions for improvements. I can't imagine that changes would be more than minor tweaking.... I see lots of sources, which is also good. I recommend reading Wikipedia:Good article criteria (if you haven't already), and then once you feel confident about having others assess it, put the articles up at Wikipedia:Good article nominations. - eo (talk) 14:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey mate, thanks for fixing the info box :) BatterBean (talk) 04:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Damaged?

Sorry i do not know what you're talking about.--Chronisgr (talk) 15:29, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rock With U

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Rock With U. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Admc2006 (talk) 10:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rihanna Singles

Hello. A couple items for you:

Don't Stop the Music was not released prior to Hate That I Love You, at least not to radio, which is the typical standard for chronology on Wikipedia.
Breakin' Dishes has not been confirmed by a credible source as the next single. Please do not list it on the article until a credible source can be referenced.

Thank you! --InDeBiz1 (talk) 04:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not to radio, which is the standard for chronology on Wikipedia. Yes, it was available as a club single prior to HTILY, but not radio. --InDeBiz1 (talk) 04:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Once again, please do not change the order of the 3rd and 4th singles from Good Girl Gone Bad. My current edit, listing HTILY (released 8/21/2007) as 3rd and DSTM (released 1/15/2008) as 4th is correct. For further reference, please review the Wikipedia article for Don't Stop the Music. Thanks! --InDeBiz1 (talk) 11:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ywtvid4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ywtvid4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Youvid4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Youvid4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

gwen stefani genres

can you please STOP accusing me of vandalism and changing the genres..to what YOU feel thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirlthemanson (talk • contribs) 12:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shirlthemanson (talk Where is this discussion then?

On Stefani's discussion page. We already know you're the same person from before. You're a sock puppet. Charmed36 (talk) 17:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirlthemanson (talk • contribs) 17:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes its ok..I know —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirlthemanson (talk • contribs) 17:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

as who? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirlthemanson (talk • contribs) 17:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Im not the only person who uses this computer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirlthemanson (talk • contribs) 18:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shirlthemanson How come when I gave sources you still changed the genres? you kinda know your wrong..so..why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirlthemanson (talk • contribs) 20:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shirlthemanson.NO I gave sources...this is YOUR opinion and they havent all been discussed...dont lie. And Im not the only person who uses this computer anyway! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirlthemanson (talk • contribs) 20:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thats really really stupid..:).. BUT.I gave sources...this is YOUR opinion and they havent all been discussed..why are you lying and being so unreasonable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirlthemanson (talk • contribs) 20:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now That You Got It genres

Hey there what is the orignal genre for "Now That You Got It" because I am not quite sure. --BatterBean (talk) 10:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Hey there. I think we need to have another disscusion on the genres of all the songs. To come to angrement with all the songs that are being changed. --BatterBean (talk) 11:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check the history..Indianscence reverted the song to its original genre (pop) months ago..It should remain pop Shirlthemanson —Preceding comment was added at 10:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Funnyhow cover1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Funnyhow cover1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey

It was discussed that as long as I have sources..there should be no reason to revert —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirlthemanson (talk • contribs) 20:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yeah sure..

So whats your definition of a reliable source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirlthemanson (talk • contribs) 20:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...

Dont tell me to not change genres to what "I feel" because you have just done EXACTLY THAT with now that you got it Im also trying to reasonable,. but you make it almost impossible to be reasonable with you..and dont just call me a "sockpuppet" when you havent got anything to say. Shirlthemanson —Preceding comment was added at 21:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

lmao

lol because your very smart..I like how you change the subject —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirlthemanson (talk • contribs) 21:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jalwlivevid2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jalwlivevid2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Iwyvid4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Iwyvid4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oh thank god!

Well atleast we agree on something!:D..but Now that you got it...I swear Indiansecnce saying that he reverted the original genre..and it was pop.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirlthemanson (talk • contribs) 16:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goodies

Why are you removing hip hop? Its title track is hip hop, so why can't hip hop be listed in the genres? Hundredalexander (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not needed? The title track is hip hop, so give me a better reason. And you don't need to reply on my talk page, I have your's on my watch list. Hundredalexander (talk) 18:29, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really hip hop? Are you serious? Hundredalexander (talk) 18:32, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then it is partly hip hop so that should be on the album's page. Hundredalexander (talk) 18:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Break the Ice

I've just downloaded it. Running time: 3:37 It cuts out the lines: "It's been a while" "I know I shouldn't have kept you waiting" "But I'm here now" And begins straight away to the music. The music is the same, until when it reaches: 2:06 (Album version) - 1:56 (Radio Edit) where it adds an extra beat to when its going "Oooooooo" and then it goes to the original sound. Then once thats over it adds that same extra beat while she singing "Let me break the ice Allow me to get you right Won't you warm up to me Baby I can make you feel Let me break the ice Allow me to get you right Won't you warm up to me Baby I can make you feel Hot"

Its very hard to explain it. It had changed alot. Here is the link if you would like to here it yourself. You have to download it --BatterBean (talk) 02:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's sounding fan made the link i gave you. But the radio edit does sound similar to that. --BatterBean (talk) 03:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:53, 17 February 2008 edit BatterBean (talk \| contribs) 1,305 edits →Goodies ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:07, 17 February 2008 edit undo BatterBean (talk \| contribs) 1,305 edits →Break the Ice Next edit →
Line 905:		Line 905:

	Its very hard to explain it. It had changed alot. Here is the [http://www.zshare.net/download/7413538066cd8b/ link] if you would like to here it yourself. You have to download it --[[User:BatterBean\|BatterBean]] ([[User talk:BatterBean\|talk]]) 02:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)		Its very hard to explain it. It had changed alot. Here is the [http://www.zshare.net/download/7413538066cd8b/ link] if you would like to here it yourself. You have to download it --[[User:BatterBean\|BatterBean]] ([[User talk:BatterBean\|talk]]) 02:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

			::It's sounding fan made the link i gave you. But the radio edit does sound similar to that. --[[User:BatterBean\|BatterBean]] ([[User talk:BatterBean\|talk]]) 03:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)