Jump to content

Software engineering: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m →Ambiguity and controversy: replace request template
Johndci (talk | contribs)
19 edits
Line 228: Line 228:
* [http://www.swebok.org Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge]
* [http://www.swebok.org Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge]
* [http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos267.htm Computer Software Engineers] - Definition and statistics from the U.S. [[Bureau of Labor Statistics]]
* [http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos267.htm Computer Software Engineers] - Definition and statistics from the U.S. [[Bureau of Labor Statistics]]
[http://www.dotcominfoway.com/software_development_services.asp Software Development]
* [http://www.laputan.org/mud/ Big Ball of Mud] A "yes but why not" point of view by Brian Foote and Joseph Yoder, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
* [http://www.laputan.org/mud/ Big Ball of Mud] A "yes but why not" point of view by Brian Foote and Joseph Yoder, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign


Revision as of 06:39, 25 February 2008

Software engineering is the application of a systematic, disciplined, quantifiable approach to the development, operation, and maintenance of software.[1] The term software engineering was popularized during the 1968 NATO Software Engineering Conference (held in Garmisch, Germany) by its chairman F.L. Bauer, and has been in widespread use since. The discipline of software engineering includes knowledge, tools, and methods for software requirements, software design, software construction, software testing, and software maintenance tasks.[2] Software engineering is related to the disciplines of computer science, computer engineering, management, mathematics, project management, quality management, software ergonomics, and systems engineering.[3]

As of 2004, the U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics counts 760,840 software engineers holding jobs in the U.S.; for comparison, in the U.S. there are some 1.4 million practitioners employed in all other engineering disciplines combined.[4] Due to its relative newness as a field of study, formal education in software engineering is often taught as part of a computer science curriculum, and as a result most software engineers hold computer science degrees.[5]

Ambiguity and controversy

Main articles: Debates within software engineering and Controversies over the term Engineer

Typical formal definitions of software engineering are

  • "the application of a systematic, disciplined, quantifiable approach to the development, operation, and maintenance of software".[6]
  • "an engineering discipline that is concerned with all aspects of software production"[7]
  • "the establishment and use of sound engineering principles in order to economically obtain software that is reliable and works efficiently on real machines"[8][failed verification]

The term has been used less formally:

  • as the informal contemporary term for the broad range of activities that were formerly called programming and systems analysis;[9]
  • as the broad term for all aspects of the practice of computer programming, as opposed to the theory of computer programming, which is called computer science;[10]
  • as the term embodying the advocacy of a specific approach to computer programming, one that urges that it be treated as an engineering discipline rather than an art or a craft, and advocates the codification of recommended practices.[11]

Some people believe that software engineering implies a certain level of academic training, professional discipline, and adherence to formal processes that often are not applied in cases of software development. A common analogy is that working in construction does not make one a civil engineer, and so writing code does not make one a software engineer. The notion that the field is mature enough to warrant the title "engineering" is disputed.[citation needed] In each of the last few decades, at least one radical new approach has entered the mainstream of software development (e.g. Structured Programming, Object Orientation), implying that the field is still changing too rapidly to be considered an engineering discipline. Proponents argue that the supposedly radical new approaches are evolutionary rather than revolutionary.[citation needed]

Individual commentators have disagreed sharply on how to define software engineering or its legitimacy as an engineering discipline. David Parnas has said that software engineering is, in fact, a form of engineering.[12][13] Steve McConnell has said that it is not, but that it should be.[14] Donald Knuth has said that programming is an art and a science.[15] Edsger W. Dijkstra claims that the terms software engineering and software engineer have been misused, particularly in the United States.[16]

Regulatory classification

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics classifies computer software engineers as a subcategory of "computer specialists", along with occupations such as computer scientist, programmer, and network administrator.[17] The BLS classifies all other engineering disciplines, including computer hardware engineers, as "engineers".[18]

The U.K. has seen the alignment of the Information Technology Professional and the Engineering Professionals.[19] Software engineering in Canada has seen some contests in the courts over the use of the title "Software Engineer"[20]

Purpose

Software is often found in products and situations where very high reliability is expected, even under demanding conditions, such as monitoring and controlling nuclear power plants, or keeping a modern airliner aloft[21]. Such applications contain millions of lines of code, making them comparable in complexity to the most complex modern machines. For example, a modern airliner has several million physical parts[22] (and the space shuttle about ten million parts[23]), while the software for such an airliner can run to 4 million lines of code.[24]

Technologies and practices

Main article: Software development process

Software engineers advocate many different technologies and practices, with much disagreement, which has originated a debate that has gone on for over 60 years. Software engineers use a wide variety of technologies: compilers, code repositories, text editors. They also use a wide variety of practices to carry out and coordinate their efforts: pair programming, code reviews and daily stand up meetings.

In spite of the enormous economic growth and productivity gains enabled by software, persistent complaints about the quality of software remain.[citation needed]

See also: Debates within software engineering

The software engineering profession

Education

People from many different educational backgrounds make important contributions to SE. Today, software engineers earn software engineering, computer engineering or computer science degrees. However, there are a great number of people in the industry without engineering degrees earned from accredited universities, so the use of the term "software engineer" is somewhat ambiguous.

Software degrees in the U.S. and Canada
About half of all practitioners today have computer science degrees. A small, but growing, number of practitioners have software engineering degrees. In 1996, Rochester Institute of Technology established the first BSSE degree program in the United States but did not obtain ABET until 2003, the same time as Clarkson University, Milwaukee School of Engineering and Mississippi State University [25] . Since then, software engineering undergraduate degrees have been established at many universities. A standard international curriculum for undergraduate software engineering degrees was recently defined by the CCSE. As of 2004, in the U.S., about 50 universities offer software engineering degrees, which teach both computer science and engineering principles and practices. The first graduate software engineering degree (MSSE) was established at Seattle University in 1979. Since then graduate software engineering degrees have been made available from many more universities. Likewise in Canada, the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) of the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers has recognized software engineering programs in engineering faculties such as McMaster University, the University of Waterloo, the University of Ottawa and the University of Western Ontario, the University of Calgary, the University of Victoria, and the Université Laval in 2006. [26][27][28][29]
In 1998, the US Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) established the first doctoral program in Software Engineering in the world.[citation needed] As of the beginning of 2006, thirteen students had graduated from the program and assumed senior-level leadership roles in the Department of Defense research and development community.[citation needed] Additionally, many online advanced degrees in Software Engineering have appeared such as the Master of Science in Software Engineering (MSE) degree offered through the Computer Science and Engineering Department at [California State University, Fullerton].

Steve McConnell opines that because most universities teach computer science rather than software engineering, there is a shortage of true software engineers.[30]

Domain degrees
Some practitioners have degrees in application domains, bringing important domain knowledge and experience to projects. In MIS, some practitioners have business degrees. In embedded systems, some practitioners have electrical or computer engineering degrees, because embedded software often requires a detailed understanding of hardware. In medical software, some practitioners have medical informatics, general medical, or biology degrees.
Other degrees
Some practitioners have mathematics, science, engineering, or technology degrees. Some have philosophy (logic in particular) or other non-technical degrees. And, some have no degrees. For instance, Barry Boehm earned degrees in mathematics.
Professional recognition difficulties in Canada
The Canadian Council of Professional Engineers (C.C.P.E. or "Engineers Canada") will not grant a "Professional Engineer" status/license to anyone who has not completed a recognized academic engineering program. Many software, and other, engineers, qualified outside Canada, are unable to obtain a "Professional Engineer" "license" in Canada. (See Council for Access to the Profession of Engineering [3])

Employment

See also: software engineering demographics

Most software engineers work as employees or contractors. Software engineers work with businesses, government agencies (civilian or military), and non-profit organizations. Some software engineers work for themselves as freelancers. Some organizations have specialists to perform each of the tasks in the software development process. Other organizations required software engineers to do many or all of them. In large projects, people may specialize in only one role. In small projects, people may fill several or all roles at the same time. Specializations include: in industry (analysts, architects, developers, testers, technical support, managers) and in academia (educators, researchers).

There is considerable debate over the future employment prospects for Software Engineers and other IT Professionals. For example, an online futures market called the Future of IT Jobs in America attempts to answer whether there will be more IT jobs, including software engineers, in 2012 than there were in 2002.

Certification

Certification of software engineers is a contentious issue.[citation needed] Some see it as a tool to improve professional practice.[citation needed]

Most successful certification programs in the software industry are oriented toward specific technologies, and are managed by the vendors of these technologies.[citation needed] These certification programs are tailored to the institutions that would employ people who use these technologies.

The ACM had a professional certification program in the early 1980s, which was discontinued due to lack of interest.[citation needed] As of 2006, the IEEE had certified over 575 software professionals.[31] In Canada the Canadian Information Processing Society has developed a legally recognized professional certification called Information Systems Professional (ISP).[32]

Impact of globalization

Many students in the developed world have avoided degrees related to software engineering because of the fear of offshore outsourcing (importing software products or services from other countries) and of being displaced by foreign visa workers [4]. Although government statistics do not currently show a threat to software engineering itself; a related career, computer programming does appear to have been affected [5][6]. Often one is expected to start out as a computer programmer before being promoted to software engineer. Thus, the career path to software engineering may be rough, especially during recessions.

Some career counselors suggest a student also focus on "people skills" and business skills rather than purely technical skills because such "soft skills" are allegedly more difficult to offshore [7]. It is the quasi-management aspects of software engineering that appear to be what has kept it from being impacted by globalization. [8]

Main article: Comparing software engineering and related fields

Many fields are closely related to software engineering; here are some key similarities and distinctions. Comparing SE with other fields helps explain what SE is and helps define what SE might or should become. There is considerable debate over which fields SE most resembles (or should most resemble). These complex and inexact comparisons explain why some see software engineering as its own field.

History

Main article: History of software engineering

Software engineering has a long evolving history. Both the tools that are used and the applications that are written have evolved over time. It seems likely that software engineering will continue evolving for many decades to come.

60 year time line

Software engineering is a young discipline, and is still developing. The directions in which software engineering is developing include:

Aspects
Aspects help software engineers deal with -ilities by providing tools to add or remove boilerplate code from many areas in the source code. Aspects describe how all objects or functions should behave in particular circumstances. For example, aspects can add debugging, logging, or locking control into all objects of particular types. Researchers are currently working to understand how to use aspects to design general-purpose code. Related concepts include generative programming and templates.
Agile
Agile software development guides software development projects that evolve rapidly with changing expectations and competitive markets. Proponents of this method believe that heavy, document-driven processes (like TickIT, CMM and ISO 9000) are fading in importance[citation needed]. Some people believe that companies and agencies export many of the jobs that can be guided by heavy-weight processes[citation needed]. Related concepts include Extreme Programming and Lean software development.
Experimental
Experimental software engineering is a branch of software engineering interested in devising experiments on software, in collecting data from the experiments, and in devising laws and theories from this data. Proponents of this method advocate that the nature of software is such that we can advance the knowledge on software through experiments only[citation needed].
Model-driven
Model Driven Software Development uses (both textual and graphical) models as primary development artifacts. By means of model transformation and code generation a part or complete applications are generated.
Software Product Lines
Software Product Lines is a systematic way to produce families of software systems, instead of creating a succession of completely individual products. This method emphasizes extensive, systematic, formal code reuse, to try to industrialize the software development process.

The Future of Software Engineering conference (FOSE), held at ICSE 2000, documented the state of the art of SE in 2000 and listed many problems to be solved over the next decade. The FOSE tracks at the ICSE 2000 and the ICSE 2007 conferences also help identify the state of the art in software engineering. The Feyerabend project attempts to discover the future of software engineering by seeking and publishing innovative ideas.

Software engineering today

The profession is trying to define its boundary and content. The Software Engineering Body of Knowledge SWEBOK been tabled as an ISO standard during 2006 (ISO/IEC TR 19759).

In 2006, Money Magazine and Salary.com rated software engineering as the best job in America in terms of growth, pay, stress levels, flexibility in hours and working environment, creativity, and how easy it is to enter and advance in the field.[33]

See also software engineering economics.

See also

Main lists: List of basic software engineering topics and List of software engineering topics

References

  1. ^ “IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology,” IEEE std 610.12-1990, 1990, quoted at the beginning of Chapter 1: Introduction to the guide "Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge". February 6, 2004. Retrieved 2008-02-21.
  2. ^ Table 1 in Chapter 1,"Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge". February 6, 2004. Retrieved 2008-02-21.
  3. ^ Table 2 in Chapter 1,"Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge". February 6, 2004. Retrieved 2008-02-21.
  4. ^ Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, USDL 05-2145: Occupational Employment and Wages, November 2004, Table 1.
  5. ^ "Software Engineering". Retrieved 2008-02-01.
  6. ^ “IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology,” IEEE std 610.12-1990, 1990.
  7. ^ Sommerville, Ian (2007) [1982]. "1.1.2 What is software engineering?". Software Engineering (8th ed. ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education. pp. P. 7. ISBN 0-321-31379-8. Software engineeering is an engineering discipline that is concerned with all aspects of software production from the early stages of system specification to maintaining the system after it has gone into use. In this definition, there are two key phrases:
    1. Engineeering discipline Engineers make things work. They apply theories, methods and tools where these are appropriate [. . .] Engineers also recognise that they must work to organisational and financial constraints. [. . .]
    2. All aspects of software production Software engineering is not just concerned with the technical processes of software development but also with activities such as software project management and with the development of tools, methods and theories to support software production.     {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); |pages= has extra text (help); line feed character in |quote= at position 261 (help)
  8. ^ Ubiquitously cited as a quote from F.L. Bauer at the original NATO Conference on Software Engineering, the usual citation being: edited by P. Naur and B. Randell; published January 1969, ed. (1969). "NATO Software Engineering Conference 1968" (pdf). Software Engineering: Report of a conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, Garmisch, Germany, 7-11 Oct. 1968. Brussels: Scientific Affairs Division, NATO. {{cite conference}}: |editor= has generic name (help); Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: editors list (link)
  9. ^ Akram I. Salah (2002-04-05). "Engineering an Academic Program in Software Engineering" (PDF). 35th Annual Midwest Instruction and Computing Symposium. Retrieved 2006-09-13.: "For some, software engineering is just a glorified name for programming. If you are a programmer, you might put 'software engineer' on your business card—never 'programmer' though."
  10. ^ Mills, Harlan D., J. R. Newman, and C. B. Engle, Jr., "An Undergraduate Curriculum in Software Engineering," in Deimel, Lionel E. (1990). Software Engineering Education: SEI Conference 1990, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, April 2-3,... Springer. ISBN 0-387-97274-9., p. 26: "As a practical matter, we regard software engineering as the necessary preparation for the practicing, software development and maintenance professional. The Computer Scientist is preparing for further theoretical studies..."
  11. ^ David Budgen, Pearl Brereton, Barbara Kitchenham, Stephen Linkman (2004-12-14). "Realizing Evidence-based Software Engineering". Retrieved 2006-10-18.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link): "We believe that software engineering can only advance as an engineering discipline by moving away from its current dependence upon advocacy and analysis...."
  12. ^ Parnas, David L. (1998). "Software Engineering Programmes are not Computer Science Programmes". Annals of Software Engineering. 6: 19–37. {{cite journal}}: External link in |title= (help), p. 19: "Rather than treat software engineering as a subfield of computer science, I treat it as an element of the set, {Civil Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Electrical Engineering,....}."
  13. ^ Parnas, David L. (1998). "Software Engineering Programmes are not Computer Science Programmes". Annals of Software Engineering. 6: 19–37. {{cite journal}}: External link in |title= (help), p. 20: "This paper argues that the introduction of accredited professional programmes in software engineering, programmes that are modelled on programmes in traditional engineering disciplines will help to increase both the quality and quantity of graduates who are well prepared, by their education, to develop trustworthy software products."
  14. ^ McConnell, Steve (2003). Professional Software Development: Shorter Schedules, Better Projects, Superior Products, Enhanced Careers. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-321-19367-9. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help), p. 39: "In my opinion, the answer to that question is clear: Professional software development should be engineering. Is it? No. But should it be? Unquestionably, yes. "
  15. ^ Knuth, Donald (1974). "Computer Programming as an Art". Communications of the ACM. 17 (12): 667–673. {{cite journal}}: External link in |title= (help) Transcript of the 1974 Turing Award lecture.
  16. ^ Dijkstra, Edsger W (1993-12-03; transcription last revised 2004-11-23). "There is still a war going on (manuscript Austin, 3 December 1993)". E. W. Dijkstra Archive. The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Computer Sciences. Retrieved 2007-02-17. When the term was coined in 1968 by F.L. Bauer of the Technological University of Munich, I welcomed it. [. . .] I interpreted the introduction of the term "software engineering" as an apt reflection of the fact that the design of software systems was an activity par excellence for the mathematical engineer. [. . .]. As soon the term arrived in the USA, it was relieved of all its technical content. It had to be so for in its original meaning it was totally unacceptable [. . .] In the mean time, software engineering has become an almost empty term, as was nicely demonstrated by Data General who overnight promoted all its programmers to the exalted rank of "software engineer"! {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  17. ^ U.S Department of Labor and Statistics The 2000 Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) System: 15-0000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations
  18. ^ U.S Department of Labor and Statistics The 2000 Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) System: 17-0000 Architecture and Engineering Occupations
  19. ^ 'British Computer Society' - "BCS is licensed by the Engineering Council to award Chartered Engineer status (CEng) and Incorporated Engineer status (IEng);" [1]
  20. ^ 'Professional Engineers of Ontario' - "Quebec Engineers win court battle against Microsoft"[2]
  21. ^ Pecht, Michael (1995). Product Reliability, Maintainability, and Supportability Handbook. CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-9457-0. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  22. ^ Boeing 747, By the Numbers "Six million: the number of parts, half of which are fasteners."
  23. ^ Grübler, Arnulf (2003). Technology and Global Change. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-54332-0. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help) p. 33: "A Boeing 747 [contains] roughly 3.5 million [parts]... the apogee (and nightmare) of mechanical complexity is the space shuttle, with 10 million parts."
  24. ^ Pehrson, Ronald J. (1996). "Software Development for the Boeing 777". CrossTalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help), "The 2.5 million lines of newly developed software were approximately six times more than any previous Boeing commercial airplane development program. Including commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) and optional software, the total size is more than 4 million lines of code."
  25. ^ "ABET Accredited Engineering Programs". April 3, 2007. Retrieved 2007-04-03.
  26. ^ PEO. "CEAB accredits first software programs" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-04-10.
  27. ^ CCPE. "Software Engineering Syllabus - 2004" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-04-10.
  28. ^ University of Victoria. "Full Accreditation granted to our Software Engineering Degree (BSEng) Program!". Retrieved 2007-12-09.
  29. ^ Université Laval. "Accréditation par le BCAPI". Retrieved 2008-01-05.
  30. ^ McConnell, Steve (July 10, 2003. Professional Software Development: Shorter Schedules, Higher Quality Products, More Successful Projects, Enhanced Careers. ISBN 978-0321193674.
  31. ^ IEEE Computer Society. "2006 IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY REPORT TO THE IFIP GENERAL ASSEMBLY" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-04-10.
  32. ^ Canadian Information Processing Society. "I.S.P. Designation". Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  33. ^ Kalwarski, Tara (2006). "Best Jobs in America". MONEY Magazine. CNN. Retrieved 2006-04-20. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help), "MONEY Magazine and Salary.com researched hundreds of jobs, considering their growth, pay, stress-levels and other factors. These careers ranked highest. 1. Software Engineer..."

Further reading

Software Development

  • Big Ball of Mud A "yes but why not" point of view by Brian Foote and Joseph Yoder, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Template:Technology-footer

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Software_engineering&oldid=193875156"