User talk:155.144.251.120: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 05:58, 28 March 2008

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, owa.auspost.com.au (155.144.251.120), is registered to Australia Post and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to System of a Down. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Pomte 03:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to System of a Down, you will be blocked from editing. – Pomte 04:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to System of a Down, you will be blocked from editing. Seraphim Whipp 10:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to System of a Down, you will be blocked from editing. Seraphim Whipp 12:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:System of a Down, you will be blocked for vandalism. – Pomte 04:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted you twice from vandalizing the System of a Down article. If you don't stop doing something like that, I will ask an administrator to ban you, do you really want that to happen? Alex 03:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Steve _(Stephen) ^talk 03:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Roswell UFO incident. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -wizzard2k ^(C•T•D) 04:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Roswell UFO incident, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -wizzard2k ^(C•T•D) 04:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Roswell UFO incident. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. -wizzard2k ^(C•T•D) 04:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring, 2nd block in a week. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — Ocatecir ^Talk 05:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

— Ocatecir ^Talk 05:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Keith Jardine, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sancho 06:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, as you did to System of a Down, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spartan- James 05:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wolverine, you will be blocked from editing. Closenplay 05:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. your edits for today will probably see you blocked - bye ! Satu Suro 06:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Donnie Darko, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Donnie Darko was changed by 155.144.251.120 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-01-16T04:56:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Amenta, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Doczilla (talk) 04:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Police, you will be blocked from editing. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 03:25, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should just block again, approximately 13,000 people are on this IP... so you can see where this is surely going to go.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew McFedries, you will be blocked from editing. Gromlakh (talk) 04:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Andrew McFedries, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gromlakh (talk) 12:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Book of Genesis, you will be blocked from editing. —BradV 05:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Grey's Anatomy‎, you will be blocked from editing. Thingg^⊕^⊗ 04:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Book of Genesis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 01:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Carl.bunderson (talk) 05:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Sean Sherk has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Pewwer42 Talk 06:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Post Office (novel), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Post Office (novel) was changed by 155.144.251.120 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-04T04:20:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. JNW (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Pixel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will ^(talk) 02:22, 10 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Tim Boetsch has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Smokizzy (talk) 01:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brock Lesnar, you will be blocked from editing. iMatthew 20 08 00:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brock Lesnar. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mate how about you stop giving us warnings, all i've seen is a bunch of low forheads who think they can change the way this IP acts with threats and talk, it's too late for that, if you're not ready to act then give me a break and shut up.

Revision as of 02:48, 28 March 2008 edit Caribbean H.Q. (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 25,233 edits →‎March 2008: vandalism test ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:58, 28 March 2008 edit undo 155.144.251.120 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 78:		Line 78:

	{{test4\|Brock Lesnar}} - [[User:Caribbean H.Q.\|<b><font color="#0000DD"><font color="#0066FF">Ca<font color="#0099FF">ri<font color="#00CCFF">bb<font color="#00EEFF">e</font>a</font></font>n</font>~</font><font color="#FF3333">H.</font><font color="#FFCC00">Q.</font></b>]] 02:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)		{{test4\|Brock Lesnar}} - [[User:Caribbean H.Q.\|<b><font color="#0000DD"><font color="#0066FF">Ca<font color="#0099FF">ri<font color="#00CCFF">bb<font color="#00EEFF">e</font>a</font></font>n</font>~</font><font color="#FF3333">H.</font><font color="#FFCC00">Q.</font></b>]] 02:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

			::Mate how about you stop giving us warnings, all i've seen is a bunch of low forheads who think they can change the way this IP acts with threats and talk, it's too late for that, if you're not ready to act then give me a break and shut up.