Jump to content

Talk:Hanne Blank: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ShepBot (talk | contribs)
Tagging (Plugin++) Added {{OH-Project}}.
Line 51: Line 51:


Per notability guidelines, I am changing the notability tag to an Expert-Subject tag/template instead. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.16.15.10|70.16.15.10]] ([[User talk:70.16.15.10|talk]]) 04:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Per notability guidelines, I am changing the notability tag to an Expert-Subject tag/template instead. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.16.15.10|70.16.15.10]] ([[User talk:70.16.15.10|talk]]) 04:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Not wanting to get into a revert war... ==

Looks like someone reverted a good link correction back to the currently bad link. Anyone have any idea why? --[[Special:Contributions/216.152.101.66|216.152.101.66]] ([[User talk:216.152.101.66|talk]]) 11:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:41, 22 May 2008

WikiProject iconOhio Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBiography Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article has had a peer review which is now archived.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Massachusetts Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.
WikiProject iconGender studies Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Introduction

Hi there. I'm Hanne Blank's partner. I reviewed the various policies on NPOV and other related concepts and am reasonably sure that I can help biograph her thoroughly without delving into the controversial. I am also here, editing this entry, with her blessing, and will do what I can to thoroughly and accurately represent her biography without causing any bias problems.

Please do edit my additions to the various applicable standards. I will not claim any kind of perfection, just good intentions. --MalcolmGin 20:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not all Wikiproject Biography guidelines complete.

Looks like this article was not originally created with the Biography template, so the question is whether it should be recreated by hand or automatically with information pasted back in by hand, or whether this issue can slip.

Also, I don't feel comfortable submitting the article for "Did you know?" consideration considering my closeness to the subject at hand (it would feel too much like a cheap attention grabbing strategy). After that, I think what's left is possibly fleshing out the biography a bit more and requesting peer review.

Also, the situation with the image of the subject is still settling out. I'm waiting for the GDFL license to be vetted. --MalcolmGin 16:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Planning to add more to the Biblio/CV area

I think I can ID print-only articles/stories etc. that have to do with Hanne's history/sexuality work (less so with the retired erotica/sexpert stuff) and will add them and relevant biblio information when I identify them. Look for gradual changes as time goes on.

Also, her Virgin book will hit shelves in the U.S. on 3/20/2007, so there may be more interview/expert opinion stuff to add to appearances.

Finally, she should publish her keynote address for the FORGE 2007 stuff after that happens, so there should be stuff to link there too. --MalcolmGin 14:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Converted format to Biography template

Took it upon myself and did it.

Does the References section need to include everything in the bibliography? --MalcolmGin 17:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing of the headshot is approved through the Wikimedia PR department

So that's resolved. Yay! --MalcolmGin 21:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The entire article looks great. And, may I say, Hanne is quite lovely. RahadyanS 12:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'll pass that on to her. :) I think that without what would seem kind of obsessive levels of detail about her non-official biography the article may never get beyond "starter" or "stub" status in the eyes of Biography Project editors/administrators. I'm not comfortable supplying that level of detail (and I think it might violate WP:COI for me anyway), but don't let that stop you (or other editors). --MalcolmGin 03:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to note this before - requested and got a peer review of the article

Peer review and discussion with Yannismarou (talk · contribs). --MalcolmGin 14:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there a notability tag on this article?

Per notability guidelines, I am changing the notability tag to an Expert-Subject tag/template instead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.16.15.10 (talk) 04:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not wanting to get into a revert war...

Looks like someone reverted a good link correction back to the currently bad link. Anyone have any idea why? --216.152.101.66 (talk) 11:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]