Jump to content

User talk:Pink Evolution~enwiki: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Onceloose (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 53: Line 53:
|}
|}
Also, I replied on my talk and the talk for the wiki page regarding our conversation. [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 15:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Also, I replied on my talk and the talk for the wiki page regarding our conversation. [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 15:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

==Verifiability==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|unsourced]] or [[Wikipedia:No original research|original content]]{{#if:Isis Gee|, as you did to [[:Isis Gee]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability policy]]. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> [[User:Onceloose|Onceloose]] ([[User talk:Onceloose|talk]]) 21:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:58, 28 August 2008

WELCOME TO MY USER TALK

Would you mind stop adding the German name in the Brussels infobox? German is indeed one of the official languages of Belgium, therefore, the German name is mentioned in the first line of the article. However, in the infobox, it is common practice to only list the official languages of the locality itself. Which German is not. --Hooiwind (talk) 09:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ka-Ching!

Hi, you keep undoing my edits which revert your bolding of the number one position of the song in the chart section. Number one can not be bolded, see WP:CHARTS. Thankyoubaby (talk) 19:29, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected it. Thank you for information. Pink Evolution (talk) 19:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And please stop to vandalise now... Pink Evolution (talk) 11:24, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million =)

Cheers :) --slakrtalk / 19:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:) Pink Evolution (talk) 19:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

warnings

Here you got http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace#Multi_level_templatesBlueduck silverduck (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i don´t know if you alreday know this:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChangesBlueduck silverduck (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Second link I knew, but the other not. Thanks a lot, Pink Evolution (talk) 20:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "Level 1 Warning"

Hello, I have given a detailed reply to your question on my talk page. Camaron | Chris (talk) 20:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia: Record charts

I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit at the above page. Your previous edit indicated that you only though "charts" was the intended wording, and I changed to the absolute intended wording...that is...peak positions should not be boldfaced (aka, 1), which was a problem in the past. It is this bolding that is against POV. Bolding would make that figure appear more important than others (yes, this is a weird technical issue, but one that was raised several times, so this clause was included to stem the tide). Unless you can provide a reason why the wording should be the other way around, I'll change back to "peak positions" tonight or tomorrow. Cheers! Huntster (t@c) 13:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change a guideline without discussion first

In response to this, I see that you changed the wording in this guideline again. This is part of WP:MoS and should not be changed without consensus. Thanks. - eo (talk) 13:18, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for making a report about Thankyoubaby (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If they continue to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you! —C.Fred (talk) 18:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention that calling them an idiot is a personal attack. Please refrain from this behavior. Tan | 39 18:30, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tan
You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Eurovision
You appear to be someone that may be interested in joining WikiProject Eurovision. Please accept this formal invitation from a current member of the project.
If you decide to join the project, please add your name to this list.
I hope you accept! - Grk1011/Stephen (talk)

Also, I replied on my talk and the talk for the wiki page regarding our conversation. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Isis Gee. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Onceloose (talk) 21:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]