User talk:203.122.240.136: Difference between revisions
Level 3 warning re. John D'Aquino (HG) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{sharedip|Tabor Adelaide}} |
|||
This is a shared IP of Tabor College. |
|||
=== April 2007 === |
=== April 2007 === |
||
Revision as of 04:31, 2 October 2008
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
April 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Copeland. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MER-C 06:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.
Your post to my talk page
Exactly. Look at the website, not the URL. The URL may be http://www.ten.com.au/ten/people_jamesmathieson.html, but his name is listed on the site, and practically everywhere else in the world except a few wrong fansites, as "James Mathison". -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 11:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Family First Party, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Family First Party was changed by 203.122.240.136 (u) (t) deleting 8530 characters on 2008-07-30T10:05:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —slakr\ talk / 07:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
August 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Family First Party has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\byoutube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/user/familyfirst) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Please stop adding so many links
We do not need Family First linked, it is already in the lead. And other Family First MPs or candidates are not related specifically to other Family First MPs or candidates, so do not add them as related links! Timeshift (talk) 05:46, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
As your changes are disputed the onus is now on you to get consensus from the talk page. We do not do things this way, just being from same political party doesnt mean its a related link. We do not and should not add Julia Gillard as a related link to Kevin Rudd, etc etc etc. Stop your obvious shameless self-promotions. Timeshift (talk)
Let me just repeat once more. Your changes are disputed. Thus, the onus is on you to take the issue to the related article's talk page, explain your argument, and once you have consensus, then you can make those changes that were once disputed. But continuing to insist on changes that are disputed will only get you banned from wikipedia. Timeshift (talk) 06:03, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps I didn't phrase correctly. When I say my reverts were right and your edits were wrong, what I meant by that is what i've been continuing to say. You are making edits. They are disputed. Thus, as there is a dispute to change the article from it's status quo, the onus is on you to gain consensus from the talk page to make those changes. As you have not done that, your actions are not right, but wrong. I hope this helps. Timeshift (talk) 06:07, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Warning
Hi, you need to discuss disputed changes on the talk pages of the articles concerned. Doing otherwise is a breach of our edit warring guideline and could get you blocked. Orderinchaos 05:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- See above. Don't accuse me of POV issues, I have been here for years and have a good reputation. I hardly listen to what IP addresses comment on about me. My reverts are right. Your edits are wrong. Until you have consensus otherwise, let me repeat - you are wrong. Timeshift (talk) 05:59, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- This is not how we do things on Wikipedia. I've blocked this IP temporarily for edit warring. If you wish to discuss contentious changes on your return, I encourage you to do so, but performing multiple reversions across multiple articles and then making accusations against other editors is not acceptable behaviour. Orderinchaos 06:08, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Oh and one more thing. If i'm here to push a POV, why was I the one to render assistance to the Andrew Evans staffer to get his free image legit and uploaded? Again, i've been here for years, and i'm happy to rest on my laurels - I do not push a POV. Timeshift (talk) 07:16, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
September 2008
Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to John D'Aquino. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoygabsadds 01:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)