Talk:Dog the Bounty Hunter: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 209.148.173.25 - "→dog: new section" |
|||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Someone removed my comment about Dog's daughter dying. It actually happened, it's relevant, there's no cite because it's not listed :on the A&E website, but anyone who watched the episode would know that it happened, so why was it removed?--[[User:72.141.64.79|72.141.64.79]] 16:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
Someone removed my comment about Dog's daughter dying. It actually happened, it's relevant, there's no cite because it's not listed :on the A&E website, but anyone who watched the episode would know that it happened, so why was it removed?--[[User:72.141.64.79|72.141.64.79]] 16:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
:How is it relevant to the show? [[User:Bulbous|Bulbous]] ([[User talk:Bulbous|talk]]) 02:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC) |
:How is it relevant to the show? [[User:Bulbous|Bulbous]] ([[User talk:Bulbous|talk]]) 02:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
::Technically, (and I am trying to be considerate to the Chapmans), she should be listed as part od the cast, and a reason she is not ::anymore. Of course, it should be done in a manner that is as respectful as possible.[[Special:Contributions/24.83.148.131|24.83.148.131]] ([[User talk:24.83.148.131|talk]]) 04:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC)BeeCier |
|||
== Watch out for vandalism == |
== Watch out for vandalism == |
Revision as of 04:54, 9 October 2008
Television Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Hawaii Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Baby Lyssa's page
Just wondering why Justin gets an article and he is not a major character in the media, yet Baby Lyssa, obviously now a qualified bail bondsman and one of the main stars of the show, doesnt have her own article? Mj2fedup (talk) 22:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
reliable evidence and sources
if you have information regarding anyone in this article, please make sure you have reliable links to reliable and official sources. As far as I know, there is no Jessica Cena working for the Chapmans, and if she is, she is not relevant to the article Dog the Bounty Hunter. We need to stick to relevance and reliable references, please and thank you.Mj2fedup (talk) 23:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Opinion
I just got done watching a former favorite show Dr. Phil. I hope I speak for most parents out here who feel that private conversations with their children are private. This was a TOTAL SET UP DOG. I have not in 25 years been recorded. I am at this time refusing to watch any programing on A&E until my favorite show DOG THE BOUNTY HUNTER IS RETURNED. At at this time I will stick with my son's opinion on the DR PHIL SHOW. Does he even have a degress? Love you man keep the faith, we have the right to our opinions and the right to speak as we want is it not our constituional rights. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.182.141.207 (talk) 22:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
You know, back when I was growing up, we kept family business PRIVATE. If I had let slip what my dad considered "private family business" outside of our little house in Green Bay, he would have taken out granddad’s leather razor strop and whipped my ass until I couldn't sit for a week. God only knows what would have happened if I had made tapes and sold them to the Enquirer!
Bad enough the PC Police have taken over the future of the English language. What remains is bowlderized to utter banality.Lowellt 03:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Expand Racial Audiotape Section?
i'm not really too wikipedia savvy, but i really think the audiotape section needs expansion. dog doesn't just use the N-word several times, he is heard on the tape basically saying he doesn't want an N-word bringing down his career because he uses the N-word, and threatens to essentially disown his son if he brings home an african american girlfriend. i think the CONTENT of what was said is more important than the simple use of the dreaded "N-word". it isn't as though he just used the slur, he made his feelings on black people clear in a private conversation. obviously that's the POV way of saying it, but i think there is definitely an NPOV way of inserting into the section that dog's comments were generally derogatory towards african americans, and went far beyond "use of the N-word". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.144.38.184 (talk) 15:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Jessica Harsh
Why does this name keep popping up, yet there is no mention of her in the official DTBH website or on the AETV.com site? because of the vandalism an internet magazine actually copied and pasted from this site believing all the information to be fact, including the name Jessica Harsh that was somehow included in the article. If anyone can verify this person as a cast member of the show, (example, which episode and what part does she play in the story of Dog The Bounty Hunter) I'd be happy to keep the name in, but for now, it will get deleted.
Not sure how to use talk so ill put this here and hopefully you will see it... Im not sure what the name of the episodes she was in but she was in about 4 of them and in one she stated that she doesnt like to be filmed because she doesnt want her family getting as mush attention as the Chapmans and she has been one of then hunters since 2003 i believe. she mostly only hunts with them when not filming now...(she has since married and is now Jessica Cena) I believe it was the fisrt season she was in and was only on screen for a few moments except for the one where she said what she said about her family she was on that one for a few minutes her face was blurred out on the ones she was on..
2006 Arrest
Why was my boner reference to him being arrested get removed? It's all over MSNBC right now! I'm putting it back. Leave it alone.
- Maybe because the article is about Dog the Bounty Hunter TV Show and not Duane Chapman himself? 70.167.19.131 00:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- I think it's relevant. Especially considering that the end-result of these litigations could result in the end of the "Dog the bounty hunter" television series. -Emhilradim 06:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- I think the arrest is irrelevant here. The end of the show as a result is speculation at this point. --anonymous6494 07:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- How is it irrevevant if the entire day was chronicled by the show's camera crew?
- Agreed. The show is about Dog the bounty hunter. Dog the bounty was arrested while bounty hunting. Seems it should be in the article.
- How is it irrevevant if the entire day was chronicled by the show's camera crew?
- I think the arrest is irrelevant here. The end of the show as a result is speculation at this point. --anonymous6494 07:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think it's relevant. Especially considering that the end-result of these litigations could result in the end of the "Dog the bounty hunter" television series. -Emhilradim 06:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Legality of Extradition
Since when does the U.S. work so closely with the Mexican government in order to put one of its own citizens in a Mexican prison?
The US has an extradition treaty with Mexico. That means that, for example, if someone commits murder in the US and goes to Mexico to hide, the Mexican authorities pledge to try to arrest them and return them to the US. Similarly, if someone commits a crime in Mexico and tries to hide in the US, the US is bound to try to extradite them to Mexico. 152.23.91.160 18:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- The US has extradition treaties with over 100 countries including Mexico as seen here.
- That isn't very clear at all. I see two possibilities: 1) The person who committed the crime in Mexico was a Mexican citizen who fled to the United States. 2) The person who committed the crime in Mexico was a United States citizen who came back to the United States. This is a HUGE difference in how things like this play out. Especially since the crime was not murder or anything severe according to the standards of the United States. Hypothetically if the United States doesn't agree with the level of severity of punishment that the other country wants them for, I do not believe the United States would hand over its citizens. For example, if the Principality of Sealand made a death penalty law against trespassing in the ocean immediately surrounding their dinky little territory. Does that mean the United States is obliged to extradite all sailors that come within 100 yards of their territory? (Even under that treaty?) Yeah right. DavidPesta 19:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- To my knowledge, the US does not even diplomatically recognize the Principality of Sealand, much less maintain an extradition treaty with them. If the country in question shows a habit of making frivolous laws, other countries will not only terminate the treaties, but probably seek to censure them in the U.N. However, you are correct in believing that there is some diplomatic leeway regarding extradition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.208.234 (talk) 19:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Let's not forget that Mexico refused to cooperate in the capture of Andrew Luster until after Dog had already caught the guy. This is because Mexico practically condones rape. It is common knowledge that corruption is rampant in Mexico and that they are totally ambivilant toward rape as a crime. As such, they did not find Luster's crime to be so bad and refused to help catch him. Then they want Dog to spend years in prison for catching the guy? I really hate Mexico. We should be down there taking them over instead of in Iraq. -Brandon Harwell
More information needed!
I live in Washington and lastnight was the first time that I caught any information about this case. that is really sad to me as to his goal is helping people and doing justice. And lastnight is a little late for people to start helping.
Death of Dog's Daughter
Someone removed my comment about Dog's daughter dying. It actually happened, it's relevant, there's no cite because it's not listed :on the A&E website, but anyone who watched the episode would know that it happened, so why was it removed?--72.141.64.79 16:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- How is it relevant to the show? Bulbous (talk) 02:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Technically, (and I am trying to be considerate to the Chapmans), she should be listed as part od the cast, and a reason she is not ::anymore. Of course, it should be done in a manner that is as respectful as possible.24.83.148.131 (talk) 04:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC)BeeCier
Watch out for vandalism
This page is susceptable to vandalism, I just fixed one that said "BTW Mexico licks donkey nuts" or something very close to that, keep an eye on it.
- I concur. I have removed unsourced and defamatory information IAW WP:BLP and WP:V policies. As a reminder to contributors, the talk page must also be properly sourced IAW the Biography of Living Persons policy when you are talking about a living person.
I've noticed this as well. False facts posted and some material removed. Neurolanis (talk) 01:17, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Current Event
Why is this article tagged with a current event box? 76.16.131.39 04:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- His extradition hearing is today. DavidPesta 19:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- You're correct. Seen this on FOX News, other news sources. IF the extradition is successful, he'll be in a mexican prison for four years. Martial Law 22:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Someone got rid of said template. Martial Law 22:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- You're correct. Seen this on FOX News, other news sources. IF the extradition is successful, he'll be in a mexican prison for four years. Martial Law 22:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Is He Really Dead
I can find nothing about his death in the news. Where did this report come from? Can we get a cit. on this?
- I just found out that he will be appearing on CNN's Headline News with Glenn Beck tomorrow Tuesday April 9, 2007 at 6 PM. So no, there is no accurate news about him being dead. DavidPesta 23:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Dog is alive and well and still growing that awesome hair -I saw him on TV talking about his case just this past weekend. BTW has anyone seen anything how what he does to his hair? I'm thinking it might be a good look for me. burgdorf (Talk) 04:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
That was another example of vandalism that this page has suffered. Neurolanis (talk) 01:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Dogthebountyhunterdvdcover.jpg
Image:Dogthebountyhunterdvdcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Request for info on previous conviction and prison sentence
Can somebody please put up info on the prison sentence he served? The article simply states that he is an ex-convict. I already knew that, but it would be nice to know what he got convicted of, and how long he spent in prison, if it was a low, medium, or high security prison, etc. Thanks in advance.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.134.106 (talk • contribs) 10:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Some of what you're looking for can be found in the main Duane Chapman article. This article is about the TV show, not the man himself. Dstumme 21:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Staring?
In the staring section Justin Bihag is listed but he hasn't been a star on it since the first season, should he be removed? Also I think Duane Lee should be added he has been on the main credits for a few seasons now. J-Axe —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 03:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Racial Audio Tape
I have requested protection for this article based on the number of edits by anonymous users. Greg Birdsall 15:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- The user that was reverting, has been blocked, for 31 hours. SQLQuery me! 16:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
I agree with everyone who says a private conversation is private. People say alot of things in private that they normally wouldn't say in public and if they are going to judge Dog for doing that then they better judge every person alive. What I think is so funny is that anyone can say anything,public or private about Native American Indians, Chinese, Japanese, Polish, Hispanics, etc. and nothing happens but if someone says something bad about an African American, WATCH OUT! I am saying this as someone who is not prejudice.I would just like to see everyone be treated equally. Would Dog's show have been cancelled if he would have told his son or daughter that they better not ever date a pollack? I DON"T THINK SO! We are all equal and all say things about others that we shouldn't. Get over it!
Controversy
Why is there no mention of the whole n-word incident (I assume from the talk page, that it was here before). I don't know much about it, but I read (possibly on the A&e page) that it was his son who leaked the recordings. Regardless of who did it, it needs to be mentioned here, most pages have a controversy section (where it applies) and since this was the reason for the show being on a hiatus, it should go here. And I also made some minor edits in the 2006 arrest section, it constantly referred to them as 'Duane Dog Chapman, Leland Chapman and Tim Chapman' I didn't see the need to include their last names every time, and it should be either Duane or Dog in most cases. In some parts I simply refer to them as the trio (it was used once before, when it mentions the chapman trio captured luster) Tydamann (talk) 12:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- It does seem fitting that the article would have a section dedicated to the controversial recording. Although the recordings did not appear on the show and were not directly related in the way that the incident transpired, it did cause the show to be taken off the air. It seems relevant, and the section titled "Return To TV" seems quite alone without mentioning the reason for its removal. It seems reasonable that the two sections be merged, demonstrating both its removal and return to A&E. Stormwhisper (talk) 21:09, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
I see no reason for a sub-article dedicated to the incident, but a mention of it would make sense. Neurolanis (talk) 01:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
dog
were you a pro- wrestler one in your live time and what was your wrestler name because me and my hubby wounld like to know thank you your fan brenda&paul.
my e-mail is brenda_lvus_paul@hotmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.148.173.25 (talk) 01:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)