User talk:Libro0

/Archive 1

Bit busy

I'm a bit busy atm and don't have time to look into the full request, try WP:RFPP they are usually good with quick semi-protects. MBisanz ^talk 18:11, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Award

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		I, Darwinek, hereby award you this Working Man's Barnstar for your tireless and continual noteless, but much needed work on FIFA World Cup-related squads. Darwinek (talk) 22:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep up the good work! - Darwinek (talk) 22:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Enough

Why don't you stay with the soccer articles? Just say away from baseball cards! Baseball Card Guy (talk) 22:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

I am trying to expand the articles by adding data and written content. Please allow me to do that. To answer your question: I am a researcher. I bring verifiable information to the baseball card pages. You violate policy in many ways. Any more questions? Libro0 (talk) 22:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Jesus Christ you are not a researcher. You are the one who violates policy in many ways. Just stop it. Baseball Card Guy (talk) 01:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

It is evident you do not know what research is. The vast majority of the information that I have submitted to the encyclopedia was acquired by way of research. This involved looking at a variety of ancient tools known as books and newspapers. These devices are from the days when information was printed on foliage bearing organisms. What exactly do you do besides uploading images. You act like policy does not apply to you. You ignore moderators. You need your own home page or try beckettpedia. Libro0 (talk) 05:18, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Stop your disruptive behavior

I will be reporting your long term pattern of deliberate disruptive behavior and personal attacks. Baseball Card Guy (talk) 05:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

They will be glad to see that I make verifiable edits and use the discussion pages. Libro0 (talk) 05:03, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

With lies, threats, and other nonsense. You are a problem. You are the policy violator You must be stopped. Baseball Card Guy (talk) 05:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

I have decided that the best course of action is to invite a multitude of experts to help out at the baseball card pages. I am going to invite as many people as I can to lend their expertise. I should have done this sooner. Libro0 (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

You never explained why you took part in a closed vote at 2008 MLS. Just for the record, I was neutral on the subject which is why I did not vote but also because it was already closed. I discussed with them the fact that my sources used both formats. We had nice discussions with everybody properly addressing the concerns and there were no problems. When I saw you there, it looked too suspicious. You were monitoring me from the moment you started editing. You claim you did not support me because I was wrong. Where exactly was I wrong? Please explain. Anyway I have invited everyone from the national dealer network, as well as all the collector forums, and several other hobbyists and expert groups. This constitutes many hundreds of people possibly even into the four figure range. Hopefully this erases all doubt that I have ownership issues. Libro0 (talk) 18:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

More Libro0 lies. I never voted at 2008 MLS. Maybe it was one of your sockpuppets? What the hell is this "national dealer network" and "all the collector forums" that you are talking about. You don't make any sense. I really don't think you are talking to four hundred people. This just makes me think you have more ownership issues by the length of your obvious bold faced lies. I never claimed to support you and will never support you. I never monitored you when I started editing. You seem a little uppity or something. You seem to be confused by your circle of lies. Do us all a favor and just stop. Baseball Card Guy (talk) 22:35, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

This is insane. I'll block both of you if either of you whine about the other one again. We have an encyclopedia to write, and you two are getting in the way. Either take it to dispute resolution, or shut up; AN has no more it can do for you except remove you as annoyances. --Golbez (talk) 23:23, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Reply

I am very happy to see you are going through mediation. I am sorry though that I myself do not know how to fill that out either. Also, because I am not a third party and have become involved between you two that I will not be able to make an unbiased or even one sided comment. But that is not the only reason. The other is that I again have absolutely no clue how RfC works. You have my good faith and trust now by the way and I will be watching this closely too. I want to see this end peacefully and I am very happy to see you have started that process. Rgoodermote  16:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I probably should not have placed the comment back on AN. However I would appreciate it if you would not jump the gun on labeling something as shouting. I was having a separate discussion with Apoc2400 as you can see below and it was quite calm. If this is how you react to everything I can see why you don't have good faith left. Libro0 (talk) 22:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

? You meant the AN, yeah. You were told to stop posting at AN and you should have stopped. Rgoodermote  20:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I don't think Your Radio Enemy is a suck puppet

Hi Libro0. I really don't think Your Radio Enemy is a sock of Baseball Card Guy. I can understand that you thought so since you wee harassed by a number of socks, but I think you are mistaken on YRE. Same with Die Profis, but that user has not edited for months so we can forget about that. If you are really sure that YRE is a sock, then you can provide me with some evidence. Otherwise, if you could come to terms with YRE it would be much easier to solve the problems with Baseball Card Guy. I might take a look at the content issues later if I have time. --Apoc2400 (talk) 18:57, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

YRE is probably angry that you accused him of being a sock puppet, so he thinks you are a problem user. Therefore he is watching your edits, and there is nothing wrong with that. I don't think YRE stepped over the line to stalking. I do the same thing when I am suspicious about somebody. When he edited the soccer vote he had probably forgotten that he got there from your contributions list. Don't worry about it. I still don't think they are the same person. The style and attitudes are very different. BCG doesn't revert YRE because BCG only reverts you. We cannot know for sure, but from what we know now you should treat them like separate people. YRE seems to be trying to help, but he is upset at you right now. If you continue improving the articles I will try to keep a watch on the related talk pages. --Apoc2400 (talk) 21:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Then we was suspicious about you even before the SSE. Still, I don't think YRE has been harassing you, just watching your edits. I don't agree with his request to have you blocked, but there is no reason to create more drama about that. I will talk with BCG too if he continues the fight. --Apoc2400 (talk) 18:06, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:50s Topps Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:50s Topps Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Not orphaned any more. --Apoc2400 (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Baseball Card Guy is now in violation of 3RR on 1950s Topps regarding the logo. Libro0 (talk) 21:07, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

LIES AND SLANDER! That was just more Libro0 baiting. He deliberately added false information, in this case a logo which is not the actual logo, knowing full well that I would notice his fakery and would revert it. It doesn't take Admiral Ackbar to spot Libro0's trap. Baseball Card Guy (talk) 12:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

My edits are not and never have been designed to anger you or bait you. They are intended to be legitimate contributions to the encyclopedia. Please discontinue thinking that everything I do has to do with you. If I had uploaded what appears on the company letterhead then you would have complained that it was not the logo and would have said that what appears on the packs is the actual logo. You have earned no credibility with me. YRE has not answered to the actions I explained to Apoc2400. Strangely, however it was BCG who came to his defense even after YRE said please ban BCG(and me). Now you both team up against the logo. Why haven't either of you come up with the same amount of citations to support the inclusion of 1968 OPC CFL? Other than non-free images, what do you guys actually intend to contribute to these pages. You better decide quickly because we are not making any progress. Libro0 (talk) 17:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

• I did not team up against you about the logo, I wanted to piss on this brushfire that you two started. I provided evidence that what you say is the logo is not the logo. I don't care about the god damed 1968 OPC CFL set and I'll let someone else solve that problem. I am sick of the allegations, recriminations, passive aggressive digs and other assorted nonsense from you two. As for your false allegations, this is the only acknowledgment: they are bogus and you know it and I am not going to stoop to your level. Your Radio Enemy (talk) 17:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

If you two want do something productive, I suggest that you guys get together and start up some new pages. Pool your knowledge and resources and earn some credibility here. There are a great deal of items that need treatment. There are late 90's and 2000's pages that haven't been started yet. It is time you guys contributed some content. Even better, you guys have an interest in OPC and all those pages need a great deal of work. Probably the best bet since I had not planned on working on those pages. OPC was also a candy company. There are numerous ways to expand those articles, you can even add the logos you think are appropriate. Libro0 (talk) 18:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

• Again with the passive-aggressive attacks. I have had it with you. The both of you need to be banned and probably flogged. Your Radio Enemy (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

You did not want it because you said it wasn't a logo. So I properly labeled it as a brand name. Now you want it deleted as a derivative image. Why didn't you start with that. It looks like you just want to get it deleted out of spite. That is the reason you have no credibility. Your account is solely to prevent me from editing. How do you account for over four months of unproductive edits. Please focus on something other than me. Try working on OPC. Libro0 (talk) 02:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry!

OK, I understand your dilemma. I'm sorry about my reply - I was in a pretty bad mood. I meant no offense.

I'm kinda full up on other stuff right now, so what I'm going to do is re-open the case as new. I can't guarantee that you'll get a quick response, but I'll bug people around IRC to see if they can help. I'll remove the notes I made. Again, I'm deeply sorry for my reply, I shouldn't have made it. Xavexgoem (talk) 11:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Libro0 (talk) 23:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Mediation

Please comment on Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-09-04 1950s Topps. Mike92591 (talk) 19:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:60s Topps Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:60s Topps Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Page titles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give San Francisco C.D. Mexico a different title by copying its content and pasting it into El Farolito Soccer Club. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Russ (talk) 13:23, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 1950s Topps. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tiptoety ^talk 20:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not template regulars

Hello. Not sure if you are familiar with Don't template the regulars, but I would like to encourage you to craft personal notes rather than just drop template messages on the talk pages of non-new editors. At best, regulars generally view impersonal template messages as being condescending or rude, and almost never have the intended result. Instead please consider writing a personal message to get your point across. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Six of your most recent messages at User talk:Baseball Card Guy consisted exclusively of template warnings: [1], [2], [3], [4]. --Kralizec! (talk) 22:00, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Noted. Libro0 (talk) 22:19, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Topps edits

It would appear that a couple of IPs have been following your edits to various Topps-related articles. I have reverted most of there edits, blocked the IPs, and semi-protected the articles in question. Please let me know if you see any that I missed. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Just saw the note you left on my talk page. Looks like we were both thinking on the same wavelength! --Kralizec! (talk) 18:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders removal is a correction?

So my adding information about the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders set on the 1981 Topps page is a correction that has to be replaced by being removed? Can you please explain your reason for the removal and why I can't put the information back. It seems a pretty arbitrary thing to do. It isn't like I am making this up out of whole cloth. It isn't like it is some obscure godforsaken thing either. You can even find it on eBay - [5] Total Mench (talk) 20:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

No it wasn't a correction just an oversite. I will add it back but I cannot use Ebay as a source. I have seen these in a book somewhere listed a 'Topps Super' type of set as a non-sport for some reason. Libro0 (talk) 02:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I edit on noone's behalf!

Again with your thinly veiled sockpuppet accusations with a side order of passive aggressive. I have been trying to get some calm here and came up with what seems like an acceptable solution. You obviously seem to have no desire to listen to others and continue to do things to upset Baseball Card Guy. I have had it with your uncivil behavior and your snide passive aggressive comments and your false accusations. If you wonder why I think you should be banned along with him that is why. Your Radio Enemy (talk) 17:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

If you want things to calm down why don't you ask BCG to stop removing information that I put up or stop undoing corrections that I make. He has no reason to be upset about those things. You should encourage him to do something productive like work on OPC which has many errors and is lacking quite a bit of information. Libro0 (talk) 19:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Can you stop attacking me in your passive aggressive way? Please. Your Radio Enemy (talk) 17:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Fractions

I think it's ok to write "2.5 X 3.5" in rather than "2+1⁄2 x 3+1⁄2" for half inches, but use the {{frac}} template for other fractions? Are you ok with that too? Just to avoid more edit warring with BCG over that. Also, be nice to Your Radio Enemy. He's not really out to get you. --Apoc2400 (talk) 14:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

You win

I have had it with you and your attacks. I have had it with your manipulation of admins. You want to get me banned don't you. I don't agree with you and point out specific policies that you are violating in articles and all I have gotten from you are passive aggressive attacks, false sockpuppet allegations, ultimatums, and a whole lot of time wasting. You know what. You win. I give up I have had it with the attacks, wasting of time, lies and other crap. God, you are responsible for me not giving a nice donation to help support Wikipedia. In fact from now on I will tell everyone I know of all the negative experiences here. Your Radio Enemy (talk) 19:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I have listed a number of literary sources that you can use to do the same research that I have done. Please help adding verifiable content to these pages. You are in trouble because you have been focusing on me and trying to sabotage what I do. I have followed the guidelines and sought help. I have also asked you and BCG to work on something like OPC or 95-08 Topps, or make new pages for other sets. I am not trying to get anyone banned. All the socks puppets that sprung up got shot on their own. Hopefully you will not get blocked from the checkuser after which it would bebest if you started adding content. I do not remove verifiable data. Libro0 (talk) 19:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC)