Jump to content

ITT Technical Institute: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
tuition not relevant for encyclopedia entry.
Veecort (talk | contribs)
326 edits
GA 6:7
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Infobox_Company |
{{Infobox_Company |
company_name = ITT Educational Services, Inc. |
company_name = ITT Educational Services, Inc. |
company_logo = [[Image:ITT TI logo.PNG]]|
company_logo = [[Image:ITT.svg|center|150px]]|
company_type = [[Public company|Public]] ([[NYSE]]: [http://www.nyse.com/about/listed/lcddata.html?ticker=ESI ESI])|
company_type = [[Public company|Public]] ([[NYSE]]: [http://www.nyse.com/about/listed/lcddata.html?ticker=ESI ESI])|
company_slogans = |
company_slogans = |
Line 16: Line 16:
homepage = [http://www.ittesi.com/ www.ittesi.com]
homepage = [http://www.ittesi.com/ www.ittesi.com]
}}
}}
'''ITT Technical Institute''' (often shortened to ITT Tech) is a private, [[for-profit college|for-profit]], [[vocational education|technical institute]] with 100 campuses in 35 states of the [[United States]].<ref>[http://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?ID=29378 ITT Technical Institute Opens 100th Location - Newsroom - Inside Indiana Business with Gerry Dick<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> It was founded in 1946 as Educational Services, Inc. and has been headquartered in [[Carmel, Indiana]], since 1969. ITT Tech is owned and operated by ITT Educational Services Inc. ({{nyse|ESI}}), a publicly traded company.
'''ITT Technical Institute''' (often shortened to ITT Tech) is a private, [[for-profit college|for-profit]], technical institute with more than 95 campuses in more than 34 states of the [[United States]]. It was founded in 1946 as Educational Services, Inc. and has been headquartered in [[Carmel, Indiana]], since 1969. ITT Tech is owned and operated by ITT Educational Services Inc. ({{nyse|ESI}}), a publicly traded company.


==Accreditation==
==Accreditation==
ITT Tech is [[School accreditation|nationally accredited]] by the [[Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://acics.org/accredited/documents/accreditedinstitutions8.6.08_000.pdf|title=ACICS Accredited Institutions|date=2008-08-05|publisher=Accrediting Council of Independent Colleges and Schools|accessdate=2008-08-26}}</ref>. It does not have [[regional accreditation]]; thus, some regionally accredited or traditional universities and colleges may not accept ITT Tech's credits for transfer and may not recognize its undergraduate degrees for entry into graduate programs.<ref name="yahoo">[http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/education/courses/distancelearn-09.html ''What is the Difference Between Regional and National Accreditation'', Yahoo! Education website]</ref><ref name="tussle">[http://insidehighered.com/news/2007/02/26/transfer ''Tussling Over Transfer of Credit'', Inside Higher Education website, February 26, 2007 by Doug Lederman]</ref><ref name="yahoo">[http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/education/courses/distancelearn-09.html ''What is the Difference Between Regional and National Accreditation'', Yahoo! Education website]</ref><ref name="usaed">[http://www.useducation.com.pk/stpages/typesofaccreditation.html ''Types of Accreditation'', Education USA website]</ref>
ITT Tech is [[School accreditation|nationally accredited]] by the [[Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools]]. It does not have [[regional accreditation]]; thus, most regionally accredited or traditional universities and colleges do not accept ITT Tech's credits for transfer and do not recognize its undergraduate degrees for entry into graduate programs.<ref name="demand">[http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/10/19/transfer ''Demanding Credit'', Inside Higher Education website, dated Oct. 19, 2005 by Scott Jaschik]</ref><ref name="tussle">[http://insidehighered.com/news/2007/02/26/transfer ''Tussling Over Transfer of Credit'', Inside Higher Education website, February 26, 2007 by Doug Lederman]</ref><ref name="yahoo">[http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/education/courses/distancelearn-09.html ''What is the Difference Between Regional and National Accreditation'', Yahoo! Education website]</ref><ref name="usaed">[http://www.useducation.com.pk/stpages/typesofaccreditation.html ''Types of Accreditation'', Education USA website]</ref>


==Courses of study==
==Courses of study==
ITT Tech offers programs specialized in [[information technology]], [[electronics]], [[Technical drawing|drafting]] and [[design]], [[criminal justice]], [[health sciences]], and [[business administration]].
ITT Tech offers programs specialized in [[information technology]], [[electronics]], [[Technical drawing|drafting]] and [[design]], [[criminal justice]], [[health sciences]], and [[business administration]].


Students of ITT Tech may pursue [[Associate's degree|associate's]], [[Bachelor's degree|bachelor's]] (all but health), or [[master's degree|master's]] (business-only) degrees. Graduates might be specialized in [[architectural design]], [[visual communications]], [[programming]], [[engineering]] and [[information technology]].
Students of ITT Tech may pursue [[Associate]]s, [[Bachelors]] (all but health), or [[Master's degree|Masters]] (business-only) degrees. Graduates might be specialized in [[architectural design]], [[visual communications]], [[programming]], [[engineering]] and [[information technology]].


==ITT, the business==
==ITT, the business==
Line 31: Line 31:
==Controversy==
==Controversy==


⚫
On February 25, 2004, federal agents, pursuant to subpoenas issued by a Houston U.S. District Court raided the company's headquarters and 10 of its campuses seeking data on student placement, retention, attendance and grades, recruitment and admissions, graduate salaries, and transfers of credits to other schools. No charges were filed, and "no conclusions should be drawn from today's activity".<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/biztech/02/26/itttech.subpoenas.ap/index.html Feds serve warrants at ITT Tech campuses, CNN]</ref> The investigation negatively affected the company's stock and triggered several class action lawsuits by investors.<ref name="fedcert">[http://certcities.com/editorial/news/story.asp?EditorialsID=571 ''Federal Probe Targets ITT Tech'', CertCities March 2, 2004]</ref> The lawsuits alleged that ITT misrepresented its financial health and failed to disclose numerous deficiencies in order to artificially inflate its reported operational and financial performance."<ref>[http://www.crn.com/it-channel/18831505 ''ITT's CEO Expects Lengthy Federal Investigation, Stock Slips'', Channel Web Network, Feb. 26, 2004, Mark Jewell]</ref>


⚫
On February 25, 2004, federal agents, pursuant to subpoenas issued by a Houston U.S. District Court raided the company's headquarters and 10 of its campuses seeking data on student placement, retention, attendance and grades, recruitment and admissions, graduate salaries, and transfers of credits to other schools. No charges were filed, and "no conclusions should be drawn from today's activity".<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/biztech/02/26/itttech.subpoenas.ap/index.html Feds serve warrants at ITT Tech campuses, CNN]</ref> The investigation negatively affected the company's stock and triggered several class action lawsuits by investors.<ref name="fedcert">[http://certcities.com/editorial/news/story.asp?EditorialsID=571 ''Federal Probe Targets ITT Tech'', CertCities March 2, 2004]</ref> The lawsuits alleged that ITT misrepresented its financial health and failed to disclose numerous deficiencies in order to artificially inflate its reported operational and financial performance."<ref>[http://www.crn.com/it-channel/18831505 ''ITT's CEO Expects Lengthy Federal Investigation, Stock Slips'', Channel Web Network, Feb. 26, 2004, Mark Jewell]</ref> In the largest of the investor law suits, former employees complained that ITT set unrealistic goals for enrollment, retention, and placement and exerted enormous pressure to enroll students. The complaint quotes a former admissions representative, characterizing the job as similar to selling “used cars.”<ref>City of Austin Police Retirement System v. ITT Educational Services, Civ. Action # 1:04-cv-00380 (S.D. Ind. Complaint filed February 26, 2004).</ref> Overall, the former employees bringing the suit describe a culture where enrollment figures were manipulated, many “enrollees” never attended school, attendance and grades were inflated, and placement rates were misrepresented.<ref name="law">[http://www.studentloanborrowerassistance.org/uploads/File/ProprietarySchoolsReport.pdf ''Making The Numbers Count: Why Proprietary School Performance Data Doesn’t Add Up and What Can Be Done About It'' National Consumer Law Center, June 2005, Deanne Loonin and Julia Devanthéry]</ref>
Since 1990, several hundred-thousand complaints against ITT have been registered with the Federal Office of Accreditation and Finance, with reasons ranging from "impossible schedules", questionable dealings to qualify for government aid and the hiring of unqualified "burnouts" from various industries to perform as teachers.

In October 2005, ITT agreed to pay $725,000 to settle a lawsuit with California in which employees alleged that it inflated students’ grade point averages so they qualified for more financial aid from the State of California. ITT admitted that “erroneous student grade point average calculations” resulted in 49 students receiving more money from the state Cal Grant program than they were entitled to. The settlement covered the state's portion of the 2002 federal claims lawsuit.<ref>[http://insidehighered.com/news/2005/10/18/itt ''ITT, Calif. Settle False Claims Lawsuit'', Inside Higher Education, Oct. 18, 2005, Doug Lederman]</ref>

The state of Indiana filed a false claim suit against ITT in April 2004. The case alleged that ITT knowingly used false records and statements (relating to, among other things, student recruitment, admission, enrollment, attendance, grading, graduate placement, and course materials) in an effort to obtain federal grants and financial-aid payments. Charges were dismissed. <ref>[http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/archives/id/34042/ ''ITT Tech accused of misreporting grades'', Daily Bruin, October 19, 2005, Lauren Gabbaian]</ref><ref name=law/><ref>U.S. ex rel. Robert Olson v. ITT Educational Services, Inc (S.D. Ind. Complaint filed April 8, 2004) and reported in ITT’s 2004 Annual Report. ITT reported that the U.S. Department of Justice had declined to intervene in the litigation.</ref>

In November 1999, two admissions/recruitment employees at an ITT Technical Institute in California, filed a law suit alleging that ITT Educational Services Inc. used an "incentive salary structure" that flouted the federal ban on providing bonuses, commissions or other payments to recruiters tied to their success enrolling students. In 2003, a federal judge in Houston threw out the suit on technical grounds, without weighing evidence.<ref>[http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-176505/Suit-may-have-led-to.html ''Suit may have led to probe: criminal inquiry puts ITT Educational in peril.'', Goliath, March 8, 2004, Greg Andrews]</ref>

A lawsuit was filed on June 8, 1995 in San Diego, California by seven graduates of the San Diego ITT Technical Institute. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants (1) made misrepresentations and engaged in deceptive acts in the recruitment of the plaintiffs for, and/or in the promotion of, the program, (2) provided inadequate instruction to the plaintiffs, (3) used inadequate facilities and equipment in the program and inappropriate forms of contracts with the plaintiffs, (4) failed to provide the plaintiffs with all required information and disclosures and (5) misrepresented the plaintiffs' prospects for employment upon graduation, the employment of the program's graduates and the plaintiffs' ability to transfer program credits. In October 1996, the jury in this action rendered a verdict against ITT Educational Services Inc and awarded the plaintiffs general damages of approximately $200,000 and exemplary damages of $6.6 million. ($2.6 million and $4 million were assessed against ITT ESI and ITT Tech, respectively.) The judge also awarded the plaintiffs attorney's fees and costs, in the amount of approximately $900,000 plus interest. <ref name="annual99">[http://sec.edgar-online.com/1999/02/19/17/0001047469-99-006685/Section4.asp ''ESI Annual Report'' Filed: 2/19/1999]</ref> <ref name="10q">[http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRm.71N9.htm''Itt Educational Services Inc · 10-Q · For 3/31/98'']</ref><ref name=424b4/>In November 1998, based on the joint application and stipulation filed by ITT and the plaintiffs, the appellate court reversed the judgment against ITT and remanded the case back to the trial court, which vacated and set aside the judgment and dismissed the case with prejudice in December 1998.<ref name=annual99/>

In January 1997, six legal actions were filed against ITT Educational Services Inc in San Diego, California by a total of 21 former students of the San Diego ITT Technical Institute. The claims alleged related primarily to the Company's marketing and recruitment practices and included misrepresentation and violations of certain state statutes.<ref name=10q/><ref name=424b4/>

In June 1997, a legal action was filed against ITT Educational Services Inc in Orlando, Florida by three former students of the Maitland ITT Technical Institute. In April 1998, the legal action in Florida was dismissed without prejudice by the plaintiffs.<ref name=10q/>

April 1998, a legal action was filed against ITT Educational Services Inc in San Diego, California by nine former students who attended the hospitality program at either the Maitland or San Diego ITT Technical institute. The claims alleged related primarily to the Company's marketing and recruitment practices and included misrepresentation and violations of certain state statutes.<ref name=10q/>

August 1998, 15 former students who attended the hospitality program at campuses in San Diego or Maitland threatened to commence legal proceedings against ITT. The claimants alleged, among other
things, statutory violations, misrepresentation, fraud and concealment by ITT arising out of their recruitment to attend, and their education at, ITT campuses. In September 1998, ITT settled all of the claims of the 15 claimants. <ref name="424b4"> [http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRs.6b4.htm#4p7r ''Itt Educational Services Inc · 424B4 · On 1/27/99'']</ref>


==Campus locations==
==Campus locations==
Line 59: Line 75:
:[[West Covina, California|West Covina]] (Learning Site)
:[[West Covina, California|West Covina]] (Learning Site)
'''Colorado'''
'''Colorado'''
:[[Thornton, Colorado|Thornton]]
:[[Thornton, Colorado|Colorado]]
:[[Aurora, Colorado|Aurora]] (Learning Site)
:[[Aurora, Colorado|Aurora]] (Learning Site)
'''Florida'''
'''Florida'''
Line 82: Line 98:
:[[Greenwood, Indiana|Greenwood]] (Learning Site)
:[[Greenwood, Indiana|Greenwood]] (Learning Site)
:[[Newburgh, Indiana|Newburgh]] (Evansville)
:[[Newburgh, Indiana|Newburgh]] (Evansville)
'''Kansas'''
:[[Wichita, Kansas|Wichita]]
'''Kentucky'''
'''Kentucky'''
:[[Lexington, Kentucky|Lexington]]
:[[Lexington, Kentucky|Lexington]]
Line 111: Line 125:
'''North Carolina'''
'''North Carolina'''
:[[Charlotte, North Carolina|Charlotte]]
:[[Charlotte, North Carolina|Charlotte]]
:[[Morrisville, North Carolina|Morrisville]]
'''Nebraska'''
'''Nebraska'''
:[[Omaha, Nebraska|Omaha]]
:[[Omaha, Nebraska|Omaha]]
Line 172: Line 185:
:[[Green Bay, Wisconsin|Green Bay]]
:[[Green Bay, Wisconsin|Green Bay]]
:[[Greenfield, Wisconsin|Greenfield]] ([[Greater Milwaukee]])
:[[Greenfield, Wisconsin|Greenfield]] ([[Greater Milwaukee]])
:[[Madison, Wisconsin|Madison]]


==References==
==References==
Line 181: Line 193:
*[http://www.ittesi.com ITT Educational Services Inc. website]
*[http://www.ittesi.com ITT Educational Services Inc. website]
*[http://www.acics.org Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools website]
*[http://www.acics.org Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools website]

{{Colleges and universities in metropolitan Indianapolis}}


[[Category:Schools in the United States]]
[[Category:Schools in the United States]]
Line 189: Line 199:
[[Category:For-profit universities and colleges]]
[[Category:For-profit universities and colleges]]
[[Category:Companies based in Indiana]]
[[Category:Companies based in Indiana]]
[[Category:Vocational education]]

Revision as of 20:17, 19 November 2008

ITT Educational Services, Inc.
Company typePublic (NYSE: ESI)
Founded1946
HeadquartersCarmel, IN, USA
Websitewww.ittesi.com

ITT Technical Institute (often shortened to ITT Tech) is a private, for-profit, technical institute with more than 95 campuses in more than 34 states of the United States. It was founded in 1946 as Educational Services, Inc. and has been headquartered in Carmel, Indiana, since 1969. ITT Tech is owned and operated by ITT Educational Services Inc. (NYSE: ESI), a publicly traded company.

Accreditation

ITT Tech is nationally accredited by the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools. It does not have regional accreditation; thus, most regionally accredited or traditional universities and colleges do not accept ITT Tech's credits for transfer and do not recognize its undergraduate degrees for entry into graduate programs.[1][2][3][4]

Courses of study

ITT Tech offers programs specialized in information technology, electronics, drafting and design, criminal justice, health sciences, and business administration.

Students of ITT Tech may pursue Associates, Bachelors (all but health), or Masters (business-only) degrees. Graduates might be specialized in architectural design, visual communications, programming, engineering and information technology.

ITT, the business

From 1965 until its IPO in 1994, ITT Tech was a wholly owned subsidiary of ITT Corporation (as "ITT/ESI"). By 1999, ITT Corp. (which had merged with Starwood the year before) divested itself completely of ITT Tech's shares but the schools still use the "ITT" name under license.[5]

Controversy

On February 25, 2004, federal agents, pursuant to subpoenas issued by a Houston U.S. District Court raided the company's headquarters and 10 of its campuses seeking data on student placement, retention, attendance and grades, recruitment and admissions, graduate salaries, and transfers of credits to other schools. No charges were filed, and "no conclusions should be drawn from today's activity".[6] The investigation negatively affected the company's stock and triggered several class action lawsuits by investors.[7] The lawsuits alleged that ITT misrepresented its financial health and failed to disclose numerous deficiencies in order to artificially inflate its reported operational and financial performance."[8] In the largest of the investor law suits, former employees complained that ITT set unrealistic goals for enrollment, retention, and placement and exerted enormous pressure to enroll students. The complaint quotes a former admissions representative, characterizing the job as similar to selling “used cars.”[9] Overall, the former employees bringing the suit describe a culture where enrollment figures were manipulated, many “enrollees” never attended school, attendance and grades were inflated, and placement rates were misrepresented.[10]

In October 2005, ITT agreed to pay $725,000 to settle a lawsuit with California in which employees alleged that it inflated students’ grade point averages so they qualified for more financial aid from the State of California. ITT admitted that “erroneous student grade point average calculations” resulted in 49 students receiving more money from the state Cal Grant program than they were entitled to. The settlement covered the state's portion of the 2002 federal claims lawsuit.[11]

The state of Indiana filed a false claim suit against ITT in April 2004. The case alleged that ITT knowingly used false records and statements (relating to, among other things, student recruitment, admission, enrollment, attendance, grading, graduate placement, and course materials) in an effort to obtain federal grants and financial-aid payments. Charges were dismissed. [12][10][13]

In November 1999, two admissions/recruitment employees at an ITT Technical Institute in California, filed a law suit alleging that ITT Educational Services Inc. used an "incentive salary structure" that flouted the federal ban on providing bonuses, commissions or other payments to recruiters tied to their success enrolling students. In 2003, a federal judge in Houston threw out the suit on technical grounds, without weighing evidence.[14]

A lawsuit was filed on June 8, 1995 in San Diego, California by seven graduates of the San Diego ITT Technical Institute. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants (1) made misrepresentations and engaged in deceptive acts in the recruitment of the plaintiffs for, and/or in the promotion of, the program, (2) provided inadequate instruction to the plaintiffs, (3) used inadequate facilities and equipment in the program and inappropriate forms of contracts with the plaintiffs, (4) failed to provide the plaintiffs with all required information and disclosures and (5) misrepresented the plaintiffs' prospects for employment upon graduation, the employment of the program's graduates and the plaintiffs' ability to transfer program credits. In October 1996, the jury in this action rendered a verdict against ITT Educational Services Inc and awarded the plaintiffs general damages of approximately $200,000 and exemplary damages of $6.6 million. ($2.6 million and $4 million were assessed against ITT ESI and ITT Tech, respectively.) The judge also awarded the plaintiffs attorney's fees and costs, in the amount of approximately $900,000 plus interest. [15] [16][17]In November 1998, based on the joint application and stipulation filed by ITT and the plaintiffs, the appellate court reversed the judgment against ITT and remanded the case back to the trial court, which vacated and set aside the judgment and dismissed the case with prejudice in December 1998.[15]

In January 1997, six legal actions were filed against ITT Educational Services Inc in San Diego, California by a total of 21 former students of the San Diego ITT Technical Institute. The claims alleged related primarily to the Company's marketing and recruitment practices and included misrepresentation and violations of certain state statutes.[16][17]

In June 1997, a legal action was filed against ITT Educational Services Inc in Orlando, Florida by three former students of the Maitland ITT Technical Institute. In April 1998, the legal action in Florida was dismissed without prejudice by the plaintiffs.[16]

April 1998, a legal action was filed against ITT Educational Services Inc in San Diego, California by nine former students who attended the hospitality program at either the Maitland or San Diego ITT Technical institute. The claims alleged related primarily to the Company's marketing and recruitment practices and included misrepresentation and violations of certain state statutes.[16]

August 1998, 15 former students who attended the hospitality program at campuses in San Diego or Maitland threatened to commence legal proceedings against ITT. The claimants alleged, among other things, statutory violations, misrepresentation, fraud and concealment by ITT arising out of their recruitment to attend, and their education at, ITT campuses. In September 1998, ITT settled all of the claims of the 15 claimants. [17]

Campus locations

Alabama

Bessemer (Birmingham)

Arkansas

Little Rock

Arizona

Tempe
Tucson

California

Anaheim (the school was previously located in Buena Park, a neighboring city of Anaheim)
Clovis
Culver City
Lathrop (Modesto-Stockton)
Oxnard
Rancho Cordova
San Bernardino
San Diego
San Dimas
Sylmar
Torrance
Vista (Learning Site)
West Covina (Learning Site)

Colorado

Colorado
Aurora (Learning Site)

Florida

Fort Lauderdale
Jacksonville
Lake Mary (Orlando) (previously known as the Maitland campus)
Miami
Pinellas Park
Tampa

Georgia

Duluth (NE Atlanta)
Kennesaw (NW Atlanta)

Idaho

Boise

Illinois

Burr Ridge
Orland Park
Mount Prospect

Indiana

Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Greenwood (Learning Site)
Newburgh (Evansville)

Kentucky

Lexington
Louisville

Louisiana

St. Rose (New Orleans)
Baton Rouge

Massachusetts

Boston North (Woburn)
Boston South (Norwood)

Maryland

Owings Mills (Baltimore)

Michigan

Canton (SW Detroit)
Dearborn (Learning Site)
Swartz Creek
Grand Rapids
Troy (NE Detroit)
Clinton Township (Learning Site)

Minnesota

Eden Prairie (Minneapolis)
Woodbury (Learning Site)

Missouri

Arnold (SE St. Louis)
Earth City (NW St. Louis)
Kansas City

North Carolina

Charlotte

Nebraska

Omaha

New Mexico

Albuquerque

Nevada

Henderson
Las Vegas (Learning Site)

New York

Albany
Liverpool (Syracuse)
Getzville (Buffalo)

Ohio

Dayton
Hilliard (Columbus)
Maumee (Toledo)
Norwood (Cincinnati)
Strongsville (W. Cleveland)
Warrensville Heights (E. Cleveland)
Youngstown

Oklahoma

Oklahoma City
Tulsa

Oregon

Portland

Pennsylvania

Bensalem (NE of Philadelphia)
Dunmore (Wilkes-Barre/Scranton)
King of Prussia (NW of Philadelphia)
Mechanicsburg (Harrisburg)
Monroeville (Eastern Pittsburgh)
Pittsburgh (Western Pittsburgh)

South Carolina

Columbia
Greenville

Tennessee

Knoxville
Cordova (Memphis)
Nashville

Texas

Arlington (Fort Worth)
Austin
Houston North (Blue Ash Drive)
Houston South (Webster)
Houston West (South Gessner)
Richardson (Dallas)
San Antonio

Utah

Murray

Virginia

Chantilly (N VA/West of DC)
Norfolk
Richmond
Springfield (N VA/South of DC)

Washington

Everett (North Seattle)
Seattle (South Seattle)
Spokane

Wisconsin

Green Bay
Greenfield (Greater Milwaukee)

References

  1. ^ Demanding Credit, Inside Higher Education website, dated Oct. 19, 2005 by Scott Jaschik
  2. ^ Tussling Over Transfer of Credit, Inside Higher Education website, February 26, 2007 by Doug Lederman
  3. ^ What is the Difference Between Regional and National Accreditation, Yahoo! Education website
  4. ^ Types of Accreditation, Education USA website
  5. ^ ITT Tech website
  6. ^ Feds serve warrants at ITT Tech campuses, CNN
  7. ^ Federal Probe Targets ITT Tech, CertCities March 2, 2004
  8. ^ ITT's CEO Expects Lengthy Federal Investigation, Stock Slips, Channel Web Network, Feb. 26, 2004, Mark Jewell
  9. ^ City of Austin Police Retirement System v. ITT Educational Services, Civ. Action # 1:04-cv-00380 (S.D. Ind. Complaint filed February 26, 2004).
  10. ^ a b Making The Numbers Count: Why Proprietary School Performance Data Doesn’t Add Up and What Can Be Done About It National Consumer Law Center, June 2005, Deanne Loonin and Julia Devanthéry
  11. ^ ITT, Calif. Settle False Claims Lawsuit, Inside Higher Education, Oct. 18, 2005, Doug Lederman
  12. ^ ITT Tech accused of misreporting grades, Daily Bruin, October 19, 2005, Lauren Gabbaian
  13. ^ U.S. ex rel. Robert Olson v. ITT Educational Services, Inc (S.D. Ind. Complaint filed April 8, 2004) and reported in ITT’s 2004 Annual Report. ITT reported that the U.S. Department of Justice had declined to intervene in the litigation.
  14. ^ Suit may have led to probe: criminal inquiry puts ITT Educational in peril., Goliath, March 8, 2004, Greg Andrews
  15. ^ a b ESI Annual Report Filed: 2/19/1999
  16. ^ a b c d Itt Educational Services Inc · 10-Q · For 3/31/98
  17. ^ a b c Itt Educational Services Inc · 424B4 · On 1/27/99

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ITT_Technical_Institute&oldid=252844441"