Linear B

This article is about the ancient syllabary. See linear b (script engine) for the JavaScript engine.

Linear B
Script type	Syllabary with additional ideograms
Time period	Late Bronze Age
Status	Extinct
Direction	Left-to-right
Languages	Mycenaean Greek
Related scripts
Parent systems	Linear A Linear B
Sister systems	Cypro-Minoan syllabary
ISO 15924
ISO 15924	Linb (401), ​Linear B
Unicode
Unicode alias	Linear B
Unicode range	U+10000–U+1007F syllabic signs U+10080–U+100FF ideograms

Linear B is a script that was used for writing Mycenaean, an early form of Greek. It predated the Greek alphabet by several centuries (ca 13th but perhaps as early as late 15th century BC) and seems to have died out with the fall of Mycenaean civilization. Most of the tablets inscribed in Linear B were found in Knossos, Cydonia, Pylos, Thebes and Mycenae. The succeeding period, known as the Greek Dark Ages, provides no evidence of the use of writing.

The script appears to be related to Linear A, an undeciphered earlier script used for writing the Minoan language, and the later Cypriot syllabary, which recorded Greek. Linear B consists of around 87 syllabic signs and a large repertory of semantographic signs. These ideograms or "signifying" signs stand for objects or commodities, but do not have phonetic value and are never used as word signs in writing a sentence.

The application of Linear B was confined to administrative contexts. In all the thousands of tablets, a relatively small number of different "hands" have been detected: 45 in Pylos (west coast of the Peloponnese, in southern Greece) and 66 in Knossos (Crete). From this fact it could be theorized that the script was used only by some sort of guild of professional scribes who served the central palaces. Once the palaces were destroyed, the script disappeared.

The script

Linear B has roughly 200 signs, divided into syllabic signs with phonetic values and ideograms with semantic values. The representations and naming of these signs has been standardized by a series of international colloquia starting with the first in Paris in 1956. After the third meeting in 1961 at the Wingspread conference center in Racine, Wisconsin, a standard proposed primarily by Emmett L. Bennett, Jr., became known as the Wingspread Convention, which was adopted by a new organization, CIPEM, affiliated in 1970 by the fifth colloquium with UNESCO. Colloquia continue: the 13th is scheduled for 2010 in Paris.

Many of the signs are identical or similar to Linear A signs; however, Linear A, which encoded the unknown Minoan language, remains undeciphered and we cannot be sure that similar signs had similar values.

Syllabic signs

The grid developed during decipherment by Ventris and Chadwick of phonetic values for syllabic signs is shown below. Read the initial consonant in the left-most column and the vowel from the top row beneath the title. The transcription of the syllable (it may not have been pronounced that way) is listed next to the sign along with Bennett's identifying number for the sign preceded by an asterisk (as was Ventris' and Chadwick's convention). In cases where the transcription of the sign remains in doubt, Bennett's number serves to identify the sign. The signs on the tablets and other ancient artifacts often show considerable variation from each other and from the representations below. Discovery of the reasons for the variation and possible semantic differences is a topic of ongoing scholarship in Mycenaean studies.

Recognised signs of shape V, CV
	-a		-e		-i		-o		-u
	𐀀	a *08	𐀁	e *38	𐀂	i *28	𐀃	o *61	𐀄	u *10
d-	𐀅	da *01	𐀆	de *45	𐀇	di *07	𐀈	do *14	𐀉	du *51
j-	𐀊	ja *57	𐀋	je *46			𐀍	jo *36
k-	𐀏	ka *77	𐀐	ke *44	𐀑	ki *67	𐀒	ko *70	𐀓	ku *81
m-	𐀔	ma *80	𐀕	me *13	𐀖	mi *73	𐀗	mo *15	𐀘	mu *23
n-	𐀙	na *06	𐀚	ne *24	𐀛	ni *30	𐀜	no *52	𐀝	nu *55
p-	𐀞	pa *03	𐀟	pe *72	𐀠	pi *39	𐀡	po *11	𐀢	pu *50
q-	𐀣	qa *16	𐀤	qe *78	𐀥	qi *21	𐀦	qo *32
r-	𐀨	ra *60	𐀩	re *27	𐀪	ri *53	𐀫	ro *02	𐀬	ru *26
s-	𐀭	sa *31	𐀮	se *09	𐀯	si *41	𐀰	so *12	𐀱	su *58
t-	𐀲	ta *59	𐀳	te *04	𐀴	ti *37	𐀵	to *05	𐀶	tu *69
w-	𐀷	wa *54	𐀸	we *75	𐀹	wi *40	𐀺	wo *42
z-	𐀼	za *17	𐀽	ze *74			𐀿	zo *20

Special and unknown signs

In addition to the grid the first edition of Documents contained a number of other signs termed "homophones" because they appeared at that time to resemble the sounds of other syllables and were transcribed accordingly: pa₂ and pa₃ were presumed to be homophonous to pa. Many of these were identified by the second edition and are shown in the "special values" below. The second edition relates: "It may be taken as axiomatic that there are no true homophones." The unconfirmed identifications of *34 and *35 as ai₂ and ai₃ were removed. pa₂ became qa.

Special values
Character	𐁀	𐁁	𐂋	𐁃	𐁄	𐁅	𐁇	𐁆	𐁈	𐁉	𐁊	𐁋	𐁌	𐁍
Transcription	a2 (ha)	a3 (ai)	au	dwe	dwo	nwa	pte	pu2 (phu)	ra2 (rya)	ra3 (rai)	ro2 (ryo)	ta2 (tya)	twe	two
Bennett's Number	*25	*43	*85	*71	*90	*48	*62	*29	*76	*33	*68	*66	*87	*91
Unicode	10040	10041	10042	10043	10044	10045	10046	10047	10048	10049	1004A	1004B	1004C	1004D

Other values remain unknown, mainly because of scarcity of evidence concerning them. Note that *34 and *35 are mirror images of each other but whether this graphic relationship indicates a phonetic one remains unconfirmed.

Untranscribed and doubtful values
Character	𐁐	𐁑	𐁒	𐁓		𐁔	𐁕	𐁖	𐁗	𐁘	𐀎	𐁙	𐁚	𐁛	𐁜	𐁝
Transcription	*18	*19	*22	*34	*35	*47	*49	pa3?	*63	swi?	ju?	zu?	swa?	*83	*86	*89
Bennett's Number	*18	*19	*22	*34	*35	*47	*49	*56	*63	*64	*65	*79	*82	*83	*86	*89
Unicode	10050	10051	10052	10053		10054	10055	10056	10057	10058	1000E	10059	1005A	1005B	1005C	1005D

In recent times CIPEM has inherited the former authority of Bennett and the Wingspread Convention in deciding what signs are to be considered "confirmed" and how all the various categories of signs shall be officially represented. In editions of Mycenaean texts, those signs whose value has not been confirmed by CIPEM are always transcribed as numbers preceded by an asterisk (e.g. *64). CIPEM also allocates the numerical identifiers, and until such allocation, new signs (or obscured or mutilated signs) are transcribed as a bullet-point enclosed in square brackets: [•].

Spelling and pronunciation

The signs are approximations: each may be used to represent a variety of distinct combinations of sounds, within rules and conventions. The grid presents a system of monosyllabic signs of the type V/CV. Clarifiction of the 14 or so special values tested the limits of the grid model but Chadwick in the end concluded that even with the ramifications the syllabic signs can unexceptionally be considered monosyllabic.

Possible exceptions, Chadwick goes on to explain, include the two diphthongs, 𐁁 (ai) and 𐂋 (au), as in Ai-ku-pi-ti-jo for Aiguptios (Αἰγὐπτιος) and Au-ke-wa for Augewās (Αὐγείας). However a diphthong is by definition two vowels united into a single sound and therefore might be typed as just V. Thus 𐁉 (rai), as in e-rai-wo for elaiwon (ἔλαιον), is of the type CV. Diphthongs are otherwise treated as two monosyllables: a-ro-u-ra for arourans (accusative plural of ἄρουραι), of the types CV and V. Lengths of vowels and accents are not marked.

Twe, two, dwe, dwo, nwa and the more doubtful swi and swa may be regarded as beginning with labialized consonants, rather than two consonants, even though they may alternate with a two-sign form: O-da-twe-ta and O-da-tu-we-ta for Odatwenta; A-si-wi-jo and A-swi-jo for Aswios. Similarly, rya, ryo and tya begin with palatalized consonants rather than two consonants: -ti-ri-ja or -ti-rya for -trya (later -tria).

The one sign Chadwick tags as the exception to the monosyllabic rule is pte, but this he attributes to a development pte<*pje as in kleptei<*klep-yei.

Linear B does not consistently distinguish between voiced and unvoiced stops (except in the dental series) and between aspirated and unaspirated stops even when these distinctions are phonemic in Mycenaean Greek. For example, pa-te is patēr, pa-si is phāsi (p on the other hand never represents b: basileus is qa-si-re-u); ko-ro is korus, ka-ra-we is grāwes, ko-no is skhoinos. Exceptionally, however, the dentals are represented by a t-series and a d-series for unvoiced and voiced: to-so for tosos but do-ra for dōra; however, to-ra-ke for thōrākes. In other cases aspiration can be marked but is optional: pu-te for phutēr ("planter"), but phu-te-re for phutēres ("planters"). Initial aspiration may be marked only in the case of initial a and rarely: ha-te-ro for hateron (later heteron), and yet a-ni-ja for hāniai.

The j-series represents the semivowel equivalent to English "y", and is used word-initially and as an intervocalic glide after a syllable ending in i: -a-jo for -αῖος (-aios); a-te-mi-ti-jo for Ἀρτεμιτιος (Artemitios). The w-series similarly are semivowels used word-initially and intervocalically after a syllable ending in u: ku-wa-no for kuanos.

The r-series includes both the /r/ and /l/ phonemes.

The "q"-series is used for the labiovelars resulting from Proto-Indo-European /kʷ/, /gʷ/, and /gʷʰ/, the latter being devoiced to /kʷʰ/ in Proto-Greek.

Ideograms

Linear B also uses a large number of ideograms. They express:

• The type of object concerned (e.g. a cow, wool, a spear)
• A unit of measure.

They are typically at the end of a line before a number and appear to signify the object to which the number applies. Many of the values remain unknown or disputed. Some commodities such as cloth and containers are divided into many different categories represented by distinct ideograms. Livestock may be marked with respect to their sex.

The numerical references for the ideograms were originally devised by Ventris and Bennett, divided into functional groups corresponding to the breakdown of Bennett's index. These groups are numbered beginning 100, 110, 120 etc., with some provision of spare numbers for future additions; the official CIPEM numberings used today are based on Ventris and Bennett's numbering, with the provision that three or four letter codes (written in small capitals), based on Latin words that seemed relevant at the time, are used where the meanings are known and agreed. Unicode (as of version 5.0) encodes 123 Linear B ideograms.

The ideograms are symbols, not pictures of the objects in question - e.g. one tablet records a tripod with missing legs, but the ideogram used is of a tripod with three legs. In modern transcriptions of Linear B tablets it is typically convenient to represent an ideogram by its Latin or English name or by an abbreviation of the Latin name. Ventris and Chadwick generally used English; Bennett, Latin. Neither the English nor the Latin can be relied upon as an accurate name of the object; in fact, the identification of some of the more obscure objects is a matter of exegesis.

Ideograms

Glyph	Codepoint	Bennett	CIPEM	English
People and Animals
	U+10080	100 A-	VIR vir	MAN
	U+10081	102 A-	MUL mulier	WOMAN
	U+10082	104 Cn	CERV cervus	DEER
𐂃	U+10083	105 Ca S-	EQU equus	HORSE
𐂄	U+10084	105 Ca	EQUf	mare
𐂅	U+10085	105 Ca	EQUm	stallion
𐀥	U+10025	106 QI *21	OVIS ovis	SHEEP
𐀥		WE *75	we-ka-ta Bous ergatēs	"Adjunct to ox" (1973)
𐂆	U+10086	106b C- D-	OVISf	EWE
𐂇	U+10087	106a C- D-	OVISm	RAM
𐁒	U+10052	107 RA *22	CAP capra	GOAT
𐂈	U+10088	107b C- Mc	CAPf	SHE-GOAT
𐂉	U+10089	107a C-	CAPm	HE-GOAT
𐁂	U+10042	108 AU *85 C-	SUS sus	PIG
𐂊	U+1008A	108b C-	SUSf	SOW
𐂋	U+1008B	108a C-	SUSm	BOAR
𐀘	U+10018	109 MU *23 C-	BOS bos	OX
𐂌	U+1008C	109b C-	BOSf	COW
𐂍	U+1008D	109a C-	BOSm	OX/BULL
Units of Measurement
		110	Z kotylai	Volume Cup
		111	V khoinikes	Volume
		112	T	Dry
		113	S	Liquid
		114		Weight
		*21		Weight
		*2		Weight
		115	P	Weight
		116	N	Weight
		117	M dimnaion	Weight
		118	L talanton	TALENT
		*72 G-		Bunch?
		*74 S-		Pair
		*15 S-		Single
		*61		Deficit
By Dry Measure
𐂎	U+1008E	120 E- F-	GRA granum	WHEAT
𐂏	U+1008F	121 F-	HORD hordeum	BARLEY
𐂐	U+10090	122 F- U-	OLIV oliva	OLIVES
𐀛	U+1001B	NI *30 F	FICUS	FIGS
𐀎	U+1000E	*65	FARINA	FLOUR "some kind of grain"
𐂑	U+10091	123 G- Un	AROM aroma	CONDIMENT
		KO *70 G-		Coriander
	U+1002D	SA *31 G-		Sesame
		KU *81 G-		Cumin
		SE *9 G-		Celery
		MA *80 G-		Fennel
		124 G-	PYC	cyperus
𐂒	U+10092	125 F-	CYP	cyperus?
		126 F-	CYP+KU	cyperus+ku
𐂓	U+10093	127 Un	KAPO	fruit?
𐂔	U+10094	128 G-	KANAKO	safflower
By liquid measure
By weight
By weight or in units
Counted in units
Vessels
𐃟	U+100DF	200	sartago	BOILING PAN
𐃠	U+100E0	201	TRI tripus	TRIPOD CAULDRON
𐃡	U+100E1	202	poculum	GOBLET?
𐃢	U+100E2	203	urceus	WINE JAR?
𐃣	U+100E3	204 Ta	hirnea	EWER
𐃤	U+100E4	205 K Tn	hirnula	JUG
𐃥	U+100E5	206	HYD hydria	HYDRIA
𐃦	U+100E6	207		TRIPOD AMPHORA
𐃧	U+100E7	208	PAT patera	BOWL
𐃨	U+100E8	209	AMPH amphora	AMPHORA
𐃩	U+100E9	210		STIRRIP JAR
𐃪	U+100EA	211		WATER BOWL?
𐃫	U+100EB	212	SIT situla	WATER JAR?
𐃬	U+100EC	213	LANX lanx	COOKING BOWL
Furniture
𐃄	U+100C4	220 Ta	scamnum	FOOTSTOOL
𐃅	U+100C5	225	ALV alveus
Weapons
𐃆	U+100C6	230 R	HAS hasta	SPEAR
𐃇	U+100C7	231 R	SAG sagitta	ARROW
𐃈	U+100C8	232 Ta	*232	?
𐃉	U+100C9	233 Ra		DAGGER
𐃊	U+100CA	234	GLA gladius	SWORD
Chariots
𐃌	U+100CC	240 Sc	BIG biga	WHEELED CHARIOT
𐃍	U+100CD	241 Sd Se	CUR currus	WHEEL-LESS CHARIOT
𐃎	U+100CE	242 Sf Sg	CAPS capsus	CHARIOT FRAME
𐃏	U+100CF	243 Sa So	ROTA rota	WHEEL

Archives

Corpus

The tablets are classified by the location of their excavation.

• KN Knossos: ca. 4360 tablets (not counting finds of Linear A).
• PY Pylos : 1087 tablets.
• TH Thebes: 99 tablets + 238 published in 2002 (L. Godart and A. Sacconi, 2002; see under Thebes tablets)
• MY Mycenae: 73 tablets.
• TI Tiryns: 27 tablets.
• KH Chania: 4 tablets.
• another 170 inscriptions in Linear B were found on vessels.

If it is genuine, the Kafkania pebble, dated to the 17th century BC, would be the oldest known Mycenean inscription, and hence the earliest preserved testimony of the Greek language.

Chronology

The main archives for Linear B are associated with these stages of Late Minoan and Helladic pottery:

LM II (1425-1390 BC):

• Knossos, Room of the Chariot Tablets.

LM IIIA2 (1370-1340 BC) or IIIB (1340-1190 BC):

• Knossos, main archive.

LM IIIB:

• Chania, tablet Sq 1, 6659, KH 3 (possibly Linear B).

LH/LM IIIB1 end:

• Chania, tablets Ar 3, Gq 5, X 6.
• Mycenae, tablets from Oil Merchant group of houses.
• Thebes, Ug tablets and Wu sealings.

LH IIIB2, end:

• Mycenae, tablets from the Citadel.
• Tiryns, all tablets.
• Thebes, Of tablets and new Pelopidou Street deposit.
• Pylos, all but five tablets.

Controversy

The Knossos archive was dated by Sir Arthur Evans to the destruction by conflagration at about 1400 BC (which baked and preserved the clay tablets), in the Late Minoan II (LM II) period. Evans made a career of excavating the Knossos site in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and creating the concept of Minoan civilization, which he believed was historically accurate.

This view stood until Carl Blegen excavated the site of ancient Pylos in 1939 and uncovered tablets inscribed in Linear B, one of the two scripts discovered at Knossos and named by Evans. Those tablets were fired in the conflagration that destroyed Pylos about 1200 BC, at the end of Late Helladic IIIB (LHIIIB). With the decipherment of Linear B by Michael Ventris in 1952, serious questions about Evans' date began to be considered. Most notably, Blegen said that the inscribed stirrup jars (an oil flask with stirrup-shaped handles) imported from Crete around 1200 were of the same type as those dated by Evans to the destruction of 1400. Blegen found a number of similarities between 1200 BC Pylos and 1400 BC Knossos and suggested the Knossian evidence be reexamined, as he was sure of the 1200 Pylian date.

The examination uncovered a number of difficulties. The Knossos tablets had been found at various locations in the palace and Evans had not kept exact records. Recourse was had to the day books of Evans' assistant, Duncan Mackenzie, who had conducted the day-to-day excavations. There were discrepancies between the notes in the day books and Evans' excavation reports. Worse, the two men had quarreled over the location and strata of the tablets, Mackenzie had called Evans a liar, and Evans had not only sacked him but made sure he did not excavate anywhere else.

The results of the reinvestigation were eventually published in a definitive work: Palmer, L.R. (1963). On the Knossos Tablets. Clarendon Press. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |city= ignored (|location= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) It consists of two works, Leonard Palmer's The Find-Places of the Knossos Tablets and John Boardman's The Date of the Knossos Tablets. In this book Palmer plays the role, so to speak, of prosecuting attorney and Boardman of defending attorney; consequently, the dispute was known for a time as "the Palmer-Boardman dispute".

Like questions concerning the veracity of Heinrich Schliemann, the controversy soon escalated beyond the evidence, which set the world of classical scholarship looking for a way to resolve the question once and for all, a still unfulfilled hope. There appeared to be no "smoking gun" of Evans' mendacity; that is, he could in his excavation reports have simply been generalizing to resolve contradictions in the data. Moreover Blegen's arguments depended more on a preponderance of evidence rather than any single incontrovertible proof. No such incontrovertible proof has ever been found.

The real issue is whether sufficient reason exists to question Evans, since there is as much evidence for 1400 as there is for 1200. Without a solid reason to doubt Evans, the community of classical scholars tends to support a date of 1400 by default; that is, LM IIIA:2. As for LH IIIB, it likely begins in the 1310s or 1300s BC, after Mursilis II's sack of Miletus; it ends around 1200 BC.

The colours of the scholars can be identified by the dates they give for the tablets. This article utilizes an outline developed by Cynthia Shelmerdine, who is in the Boardman camp. While stating two possibilities for the main archive of Knossian tablets, she accepts a 1400 date for the Room of the Chariot Tablets. There still might have been two conflagrations and tablet firings, one in 1200 and one in 1400. As an example of a scholar who is in the Palmer camp, see Rutter, Jeremy B. (2000). "Lesson 25: The Linear B Tablets and Mycenaean Social, Political, and Economic Organization". Prehistoric Archaeology of the Aegean. Retrieved 2008-03-28. Rutter relies on a similarity of scribal hand between one of the Chania tablets and the Knossos tablets and dates all the tablets from 1350-1300 to 1200 BC.

Nearly every scholar presents their view as the generally accepted view or the one most proved by recent evidence. Regardless of how they may present their perceptions, the issue is very much open and the search for evidence continues.

Contents

The major cities and palaces used Linear B for records of disbursements of goods. Wool, sheep, and grain were some common items, often given to groups of religious people and also to groups of "men watching the coastline."

The tablets were kept in groups in baskets on shelves, judging by impressions left in the clay from the weaving of the baskets. When the buildings in which they were housed were destroyed by fires, many of the tablets were then fired.

Decipherment

Tablets.

Arthur J. Evans

The decipherment of Linear B began as an interest by the British archaeologist Arthur Evans in collecting and studying ancient engraved gemstones he had begun to obtain by purchase and by short-term excavations in Bosnia and Herzegovina, continuing the passion his father had for acquiring and investigating antiquarian artifacts. Between 1877 and 1882 he was Balkans correspondant of the Manchester Guardian there, reporting on a revolt of the Serbs and Bulgars assisted by the Russians against the Ottoman Empire. The Ottomans lost control of the region in 1878 and its subsequent rulers, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, expelled Evans from the country after a 6-week sojourn in prison, claiming he had supported another rebellion against them.

He and his new wife returned to live quietly in Oxford and after a tour of Greece and the Balkans in 1883 during which they favored archaeological sites and exhibits including Orchomenos and Athens Arthur became keeper of the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford in 1884, delivering an inaugural address advocating that the Ashmolean become a "home of archaeology in Oxford." Thus when presented by Greville Chester in 1886 with an engraved gemstone purchased in Athens but reportedly from Crete he began to study publications of these stones suspecting that the "hieroglyphs" with which they were said to be inscribed were part of a writing system. In 1893 after the death of his wife Margaret he visited Athens to view the exhibition of artifacts from Mycenae and try to acquire more gemstones. While there he received a tour conducted personally by Schliemann and noticed that a few of the signs occured on Mycenaean artifacts. He began to call the supposed writing system "Mycenaean." Heinrich Schliemann had never identified the signs clearly as writing, relating in his major work on Mycenae that "of combinations of signs resembling inscriptions I have hitherto only found three or four ...." Evans also verified from the antiquarian dealers that the stones were coming from Crete.

Losing no time Evans and a friend, John Myres, embarked for Crete and in 1893, 1895 and 1896 travelled over the entire island looking for the sources of the stones. They found that the stones were worn by Cretan women as amulets and were called γαλόπετρες (galopetres, "milk-stones") and had come from the extensive Mycenaean ruins. Starting in 1894 Evans published his theories that the signs evidenced various phases in the development of a writing system in the Journal of Hellenic Studies, the first article being the much-cited Primitive Pictographs and a Prae-Phoenician Script from Crete. In these articles Evans distinguished between "pictographic writing" and "a linear system of writing." He did not explicitly define these terms, causing some confusion among subsequent writers concerning what he meant but in 1898 he wrote "These linear forms indeed consist of simple geometrical figures which unlike the more complicated pictorial class were little susceptible to modification," the idea being that the pictographs were communications of meaning by pictures, but the linear characters were mere outlines standing for sounds and strung out like alphabetic writing. Although he called the writing alphabetic Evans believed it also might be syllabic signs. At the conclusion of the 1898 article Evans asserted "That the linear or quasi-alphabetic signs ... were in the main ultimately derived from the rudely scratched line pictures belonging to the infancy of art can hardly be doubted."

The first clay tablet at Knossos was discovered by the British archaeologist Arthur Evans on March 31, 1900 and on April 6 he discovered a significant hoard of tablets (measuring 5x10 inches).

Emmett L. Bennett

The convention for numbering the symbols still in use today was first devised by United States Professor Emmett L. Bennett, Jr., who, by 1950, had deciphered the metrical system. He was also an early proponent of the idea that Linear A and B represented different languages.

Alice Kober

About the same time, Alice Kober studied Linear B and managed to construct grids, linking symbols that seemed to have a strong grammatical relationship. Kober noticed that a number of Linear B words had common roots and suffixes. This led her to believe that Linear B represented an inflected language, with nouns changing their endings depending on their case. However, some characters in the middle of the words seemed to correspond with neither a root nor a suffix. Because this effect was found in other, known languages, Kober surmised that the odd characters were bridging syllables, with the beginning of the syllable belonging to the root and the end belonging to the suffix. This was a reasonable assumption, since Linear B had far too many characters to be considered alphabetic and far too few characters to be logographic; therefore, each character should represent a syllable.

Using the knowledge that certain characters shared the same beginning or ending sounds, Kober built a table similar to the one above; her untimely death at age 43 in 1950 prevented her from possibly taking the final step or see others do it, namely to link the characters to actual phonetics.

Ventris and Chadwick

Michael Ventris and John Chadwick performed the bulk of their decipherment of Linear B between 1951 and 1953. At first, Ventris chose his own numbering system, and agreed with Evans' hypothesis that Linear B was not Greek; however he later switched back to Bennett's system.

Based on Kober's work, and after making some inspired assumptions, Ventris was able to deduce the pronunciation of the syllables. To the amazement of Ventris himself, the deciphering of Linear B proved that it was a written form of Greek, in direct contradiction to the general scientific views of the times. Chadwick, an expert in historical Greek, helped Ventris decipher the text and rebuild the vocabulary and grammar of Mycenaean Greek.

Ventris' discovery was of immense significance, because it demonstrated a Greek-speaking Minoan-Mycenaean culture on Crete, and presented Greek in writing some 600 years earlier than what was thought at the time.

Interestingly, in 1935, the British School at Athens was celebrating its fiftieth anniversary with an exhibition at Burlington House, London. Among the speakers was Sir Arthur Evans, then in his eighty-fourth year and the teenager Michael Ventris was present in the audience.

Unicode

Linear B is assigned Unicode range 10000–1007F for syllabograms and 10080–100FF for ideograms.

Linear B Syllabary[1][2] Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

A

B

C

D

E

F

U+1000x

𐀀

𐀁

𐀂

𐀃

𐀄

𐀅

𐀆

𐀇

𐀈

𐀉

𐀊

𐀋

𐀍

𐀎

𐀏

U+1001x

𐀐

𐀑

𐀒

𐀓

𐀔

𐀕

𐀖

𐀗

𐀘

𐀙

𐀚

𐀛

𐀜

𐀝

𐀞

𐀟

U+1002x

𐀠

𐀡

𐀢

𐀣

𐀤

𐀥

𐀦

𐀨

𐀩

𐀪

𐀫

𐀬

𐀭

𐀮

𐀯

U+1003x

𐀰

𐀱

𐀲

𐀳

𐀴

𐀵

𐀶

𐀷

𐀸

𐀹

𐀺

𐀼

𐀽

𐀿

U+1004x

𐁀

𐁁

𐁂

𐁃

𐁄

𐁅

𐁆

𐁇

𐁈

𐁉

𐁊

𐁋

𐁌

𐁍

U+1005x

𐁐

𐁑

𐁒

𐁓

𐁔

𐁕

𐁖

𐁗

𐁘

𐁙

𐁚

𐁛

𐁜

𐁝

U+1006x

U+1007x

Notes 1.^ As of Unicode version 16.0 2.^ Grey areas indicate non-assigned code points

Linear B Ideograms[1][2] Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

A

B

C

D

E

F

U+1008x

𐂀

𐂁

𐂂

𐂃

𐂄

𐂅

𐂆

𐂇

𐂈

𐂉

𐂊

𐂋

𐂌

𐂍

𐂎

𐂏

U+1009x

𐂐

𐂑

𐂒

𐂓

𐂔

𐂕

𐂖

𐂗

𐂘

𐂙

𐂚

𐂛

𐂜

𐂝

𐂞

𐂟

U+100Ax

𐂠

𐂡

𐂢

𐂣

𐂤

𐂥

𐂦

𐂧

𐂨

𐂩

𐂪

𐂫

𐂬

𐂭

𐂮

𐂯

U+100Bx

𐂰

𐂱

𐂲

𐂳

𐂴

𐂵

𐂶

𐂷

𐂸

𐂹

𐂺

𐂻

𐂼

𐂽

𐂾

𐂿

U+100Cx

𐃀

𐃁

𐃂

𐃃

𐃄

𐃅

𐃆

𐃇

𐃈

𐃉

𐃊

𐃋

𐃌

𐃍

𐃎

𐃏

U+100Dx

𐃐

𐃑

𐃒

𐃓

𐃔

𐃕

𐃖

𐃗

𐃘

𐃙

𐃚

𐃛

𐃜

𐃝

𐃞

𐃟

U+100Ex

𐃠

𐃡

𐃢

𐃣

𐃤

𐃥

𐃦

𐃧

𐃨

𐃩

𐃪

𐃫

𐃬

𐃭

𐃮

𐃯

U+100Fx

𐃰

𐃱

𐃲

𐃳

𐃴

𐃵

𐃶

𐃷

𐃸

𐃹

𐃺

Notes 1.^ As of Unicode version 16.0 2.^ Grey areas indicate non-assigned code points

Further reading

• Chadwick, John (1976). The Mycenaean World. Cambridge UP. ISBN 0-521-29037-6.
• Chadwick, John (1958). The Decipherment of Linear B. Second edition (1990). Cambridge UP. ISBN 0-521-39830-4.
• Chadwick, John (1987). Linear B and Related Scripts; "Reading the Past". Third impression (1997). University of California Press/British Museum. ISBN 0-520-06019-9. has the Enkomi clay tablet, circa 1500 BCE., examples of Linear B tablets, and translated, the basic Linear B syllabary, the Cypriot syllabary and discussions thereof, and short sections on Linear A, and the Phaistos Disk.
• Levin, Saul (1964). The Linear B Decipherment Controversy Re-examined. State University of New York Press. OCLC 288842.
• Robinson, Andrew (1995). The Story of Writing. Paperback edition (1999). Thames and Hudson. ISBN 0-500-28156-4. Chapter 6, Linear B, pp 108-119: discusses Arthur Evans, his work, the Cypriot clues, the syllabary, Alice Kober, the "Grid", and a sample tablet transliterated, and translated into English.
• Singh, Simon (2000). The Code Book. Anchor. ISBN 0-385-49532-3. for a general outline of the Linear B deciphering story, from Schliemman to Chadwick.
• Ventris, Michael (1988). Work notes on Minoan language research and other unedited papers. Edizioni dell'Ateneo 1988 Roma.
• Ventris, Michael and Chadwick, John (1956). Documents in Mycenaean Greek. Second edition (1973). Cambridge UP. ISBN 0-521-08558-6.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

See also

• Aegean civilization
• Linear A
• Linear C
• Trojan script

External links

• Ager, Simon (1998–2009). "Linear B" (html). Omniglot. Retrieved 2009-01-06.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
• Clark, Curtis (1992–1998). "TrueType Fonts: Ancient alphabets and mythic symbols: Linear B". Curtis Clark.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
• Gavalas, Markos. "MYCENAEAN (Linear B) - ENGLISH Dictionary" (PDF). explorecrete.com. Retrieved 2009-01-11.
• Template:Dmoz
• Lo, Lawrence (1996–2005). "Linear B" (html). AncientScripts.com. Retrieved 2009-01-05.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
• McCreedy, David. "Gallery of Unicode Fonts: Linear B Syllabary" (html). WAZU, Japan. Retrieved 2009-01-11. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
• Owens, Dr. Gareth (2005–2008). "Daidalika - Scripts and Languages of Minoan and Mycenaean Crete" (html) (in English and Modern Greek). Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Crete. Retrieved 2009-01-09.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link) CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link).
• Palaima, Thomas G. (2000). The Parallel Lives of Michael Ventris and Linda Schele and the Decipherment of Mycenaean and Mayan Writing (pdf). Austin: University of Texas. ISBN 096494104X. Retrieved 2009-01-13. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
• Palmer, Dr. Michael M. "The Linear B Syllabary" (html). Chapel Hill, NC: Greek-Language.com. Retrieved 2009-01-05.
• Rutter, Jeremy B (1996–1997). "The Prehistoric Archaeology of the Aegean" (html). Hanover, NH: The Foundation of the Hellenic World, Dartmouth College. Retrieved 2009-01-05.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
• Rutter, Jeremy B (1996–1997). "The Linear B Tablets and Mycenaean Organization" (html). Hanover, NH: The Foundation of the Hellenic World, Dartmouth College. Retrieved 2009-01-05.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
• Unicode code pages for the Linear B syllabary and ideograms, including sample glyphs.