Jump to content

Fire (1996 film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Reception: elaborating
Line 85: Line 85:
[[Deepa Mehta]] expressed frustration in interviews that the film was consistently described as a lesbian film. She said, "lesbianism is just another aspect of the film...''Fire'' is not a film about lesbians," but rather about "the choices we make in life." <ref> Verma, Suparn. [http://www.rediff.com/entertai/oct/24deep.htm "An interview with Deepa Mehta"] ''[[Rediff.com]]'', October 24, 1997. Accessed March 10, 2008. </ref> <ref> Deshpande, Manisha. [http://www.cscsarchive.org:8081/MediaArchive/art.nsf/(docid)/F44A47D309536C5C6525694000620188?OpenDocument "In the line of fire"] ''[[The Indian Express]]'', December 13, 1998. Accessed March 12, 2008. </ref>
[[Deepa Mehta]] expressed frustration in interviews that the film was consistently described as a lesbian film. She said, "lesbianism is just another aspect of the film...''Fire'' is not a film about lesbians," but rather about "the choices we make in life." <ref> Verma, Suparn. [http://www.rediff.com/entertai/oct/24deep.htm "An interview with Deepa Mehta"] ''[[Rediff.com]]'', October 24, 1997. Accessed March 10, 2008. </ref> <ref> Deshpande, Manisha. [http://www.cscsarchive.org:8081/MediaArchive/art.nsf/(docid)/F44A47D309536C5C6525694000620188?OpenDocument "In the line of fire"] ''[[The Indian Express]]'', December 13, 1998. Accessed March 12, 2008. </ref>


[[Madhu Kishwar]], then-editor of ''[[Manushi]]'', wrote a highly critical review of ''Fire'', finding fault with the depiction of the characters in the film as a "mean spirited caricature of middle class family life among urban Hindus". She claimed that homosexuality was socially accepted in India as long as it remained a private affair, adding that [[Deepa Mehta|Mehta]] "did a disservice to the cause of women... by crudely pushing the Radha-Sita relationship into the [[lesbian]] mould," as women would now be unable to form intimate relationships with other women without being branded as lesbians. <ref> Kishwar, Madhu. [http://www.cscsarchive.org:8081/__e5256852001e3a90.nsf/0/df4e59a95be275e06525693f001ae98e!OpenDocument&Highlight=0,fire,kishwar "Naive Outpourings of a Self-Hating Indian: Deepa Mehta’s Fire"], ''[[Manushi]]'', January 1, 1998. Accessed March 15, 2008.</ref>
Other criticisms include those by feminist Madhu Kishwar, who, while criticizing the disproportionate reactions of Shiv Sena and other such groups, nonetheless maintained that the film stereotyped and degraded Indian culture to western audiences. She praised Mehta for portraying Lesbianisn in the film but suggested that it be done with sensitivity instead of sensationalism. She also notes that homosexuals have never been persecuted in India as much as they have been elsewhere.[http://www.infinityfoundation.com/ECIToutpouringsframeset.htm]


== Cast ==
== Cast ==

Revision as of 02:41, 26 January 2009

Fire
Movie poster
Directed byDeepa Mehta
Written byDeepa Mehta
Produced byBobby Bedi
Deepa Mehta
StarringNandita Das
Shabana Azmi
CinematographyGiles Nuttgens
Edited byBarry Farrell
Music byA R Rahman
Distributed byZeitgeist Films
Release date
6 September 1996 (Toronto Film Festival)
Running time
108 min. UK
104 min. US
CountriesIndia
Canada
LanguagesHindi
English
This article is about the Indian film. For the Pakistani Lollywood film of the same name, see Fire (2006 film).

Fire (Template:Lang-hi) is a 1996 film directed and written by Deepa Mehta, starring Shabana Azmi and Nandita Das. It is the first of Mehta's "Elements" trilogy. It is followed by Earth (1998) and Water (2005).

The film is loosely based on Ismat Chugtai's 1941 story Lihaf (The Quilt) [1]. It is the first Indian film to explicitly show homosexual relations. After its 1998 release in India, right-wing Hindu groups staged several violent protests, setting off a flurry of public dialogue around issues such as homosexuality and freedom of speech.

Plot

The film is set in contemporary Delhi, India, in the household of a joint family which runs a fast-food and video business in the ground floor of their two-storey home. The protagonists are the two daughters-in-law, both of whom have joined the family by arranged marriage: Sita (Nandita Das), who is newly wed to the younger son Jatin (Javed Jaffrey); and Radha (Shabana Azmi), who has been married to the elder son Ashok (Kulbhushan Kharbanda) for 15 years. Both couples are unhappy. Jatin, who feels he has been pressured into marriage by the family, neglects Sita and continues to see his Chinese girlfriend. Ashok has chosen to become a tapasvin (an ascetic) after discovering that Radha is infertile, and has been using her to test his resolve in celibacy for 13 years. The two women turn to each other for solace and become lovers. Tipped off by a servant, Ashok discovers them in bed together. Sita leaves, while Radha, who wishes to explain matters to Ashok, promises to meet her at the Nizamuddin Dargah to start a new life together. In the confrontation that follows, Radha's sari catches fire from the kitchen stove and Ashok abandons her in flames. In the final scene, the two women are reunited.

Events surrounding screenings of Fire in India

Fire was passed uncut by India's censor board (the Central Board of Film Certification) in May 1998 with a rating of Adult, the only condition being that the character Sita's name be changed to Nita.[2] The film was first screened on 13 Nov 1998 and ran to full houses in most metropolitan cities throughout India for almost 3 weeks.

On December 2, more than 200 Shiv Sanaiks stormed a Cinemax theatre in suburban Goregaon in Mumbai, smashing glass panes, burning posters and shouting slogans. They compelled managers to refund tickets to moviegoers. On Dec 3, a Regal theatre in Delhi was similarly stormed. Bajrang Dal workers with lathis invaded Rajpalace and Rajmahal in Surat, breaking up everything in sight and driving away frightened audiences. Theatres in Surat and Pune stopped screening the film on the same day. When attackers attempted to shut down a screening in Calcutta, however, ushers and audience fought back and the movie stayed open. Twenty-nine people were arrested in Mumbai in connection with these incidents.[2][3] Chief Minister Manohar Joshi supported the acts of vandalism, saying, "I congratulate them for what they have done. The film's theme is alien to our culture."[2]

On December 4, the film was referred back to the Censor Board for a re-examination. The Indian government was criticized for siding with the vandalizers.[4] On December 5, a group of film personalities and human rights activists, including Deepa Mehta, Indian movie star Dilip Kumar, and director Mahesh Bhatt, submitted a 17-page petition to the Supreme Court asking that a "sense of security" be provided, in addition to basic protection, so that the film could be screened smoothly.[5] The petition referenced articles 14, 19, 21, 25 of the Indian Constitution, which promise the right to equality, life and liberty, freedom of speech and expression, freedom of conscience, free expression of religious practice and belief, and the right to hold peaceful meetings.[6]

On December 7, Deepa Mehta led a candlelit protest in New Delhi with activists from 32 organizations against the withdrawal of Fire, carrying placards, shouting anti-Shiv Sena slogans and crying for the freedom of right to expression.[7] On December 12, about 60 Shiv Sena men stripped down to their underwear and squatted in front of Dilip Kumar's house to protest his support of Fire. 22 were arrested and Kumar, as well as others involved in the production of the film were provided with police security.[8]

Cinemax reopened screenings of Fire on December 18, but a hundred members of the BJP vandalized posters at the Sundar Theatre in Kanpur despite the police commissioner's reassurance that protection has been arranged.[6] Fire was re-released without cuts by the Censor Board on February 12, 1999.[9] Theatre screenings were resumed on February 26 and continued without incident.[10]

Reception

In the initial weeks following the release of Fire, reviewers praised the film's explicit depiction of a homosexual relationship as "gutsy" [11], "explosive", [12] "pathbreaking". [13] Following the Shiv Sena attacks on the film, prominent party members said Fire had been targeted because it was an "immoral and pornographic" film "against Indian tradition and culture." The lesbian relationship depicted in the film was criticized as "not a part of Indian history or culture." [14] [15] [16] Other politicians of the Hindu right voiced fears that the film would "spoil [Indian] women" and younger generations by teaching "unhappy wives not to depend on their husbands" and informing the public about "acts of perversion." [17] Speaking on the dangers of Fire, Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackery compared lesbianism to "a sort of a social AIDS" which might "spread like an epidemic." [6] [18] [3] Furthermore, Thackery claimed that the film was an attack on Hinduism because the protagonists were named Sita and Radha, both significant goddesses in Hindu belief, and that he would withdraw his objections to the film if the names were changed to Muslim names.[19]

A statement issued from the Shiv Sena's women's wing said, "If women's physical needs get fulfilled through lesbian acts, the institution of marriage will collapse, reproduction of human beings will stop." [20] [6] Critics charged the Shiv Sena of committing "cultural terrorism" [15] and of using the rhetoric of "Indian tradition" to protest images of female independence and suppress freedom of speech. [21] "The justification for [Shiv Sena's] action... demonstrates that Indian 'culture' for the Sangh parivar is defined essentially in terms of male control over female sexuality." [6] [22]

Gay activist Ashok Row Kavi criticized the Shiv Sena's protests as "gay-bashing" and disputed their claims that lesbianism was "against Indian tradition", indicating that homosexuality is in fact abundantly present in Hinduism and that the criminalization of homosexuality was a legacy of British colonialism, heavily informed by Christianity. [17] Pointing to evidence of lesbianism in Indian tradition, he said, "What's wrong in two women having sex? If they think it doesn't happen in the Indian society they should see the sculptures of Khajuraho or Konark." [6] [23] Madhu Kishwar, then-editor of Manushi, wrote a highly critical review of Fire, finding fault with the depiction of the characters in the film as a "mean spirited caricature of middle class family life among urban Hindus". She claimed that homosexuality was socially accepted in India as long as it remained a private affair, adding that Mehta "did a disservice to the cause of women... by crudely pushing the Radha-Sita relationship into the lesbian mould," as women would now be unable to form intimate relationships with other women without being branded as lesbians. [24] Kishwar in turn received criticism for claiming that homophobia did not exist in India, and for failing to acknowledge the rights of homosexuals to publicly assert their identities in India. [6]

Deepa Mehta expressed frustration in interviews that the film was consistently described as a lesbian film. She said, "lesbianism is just another aspect of the film...Fire is not a film about lesbians," but rather about "the choices we make in life." [25] [26]

Madhu Kishwar, then-editor of Manushi, wrote a highly critical review of Fire, finding fault with the depiction of the characters in the film as a "mean spirited caricature of middle class family life among urban Hindus". She claimed that homosexuality was socially accepted in India as long as it remained a private affair, adding that Mehta "did a disservice to the cause of women... by crudely pushing the Radha-Sita relationship into the lesbian mould," as women would now be unable to form intimate relationships with other women without being branded as lesbians. [27]

Cast

References

  1. ^ Gopinath, Gayatri (2005). Impossible Desires. Durham and London: Duke University press. {{cite book}}: |format= requires |url= (help)
  2. ^ a b c Jain, Madhu; Raval, Sheela (1998-12-21), "Ire over Fire", India Today, retrieved 2008-03-14
  3. ^ a b Bearak, Barry (1998-12-24), "A Lesbian Idyll, and the Movie Theaters Surrender", New York Times, retrieved 2008-03-12
  4. ^ "'Fire' referred back to censor board", The Times of India, 1998-12-05 {{citation}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  5. ^ Unknown Author. "Hindu leader says lesbian film should be about Moslem family" Agence France Presse, December 14, 1998. Accessed March 14, 2008.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g Vanita, Ruth (2002). Queering India. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0415929504. {{cite book}}: |format= requires |url= (help)
  7. ^ Unknown Author. "Candle-light protest against withdrawal of controversial film", BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, December 9, 1998. Accessed March 14, 2008.
  8. ^ Unknown Author. "Sainiks spew venom against Dilip Kumar for backing Fire," Indian Express, December 13, 1998. Accessed March 16, 2008.
  9. ^ "Indian censors clear "Fire" for a second time", Reuters, February 14, 1999. Accessed March 10, 2008.
  10. ^ The Naz Foundation Trust, "History's Flirtation with Fire", August 1, 1999. Accessed March 7, 2008.
  11. ^ "That Burning Feeling", Times of India, November 20, 1998. Accessed March 16, 2008.
  12. ^ Mullick, Swapan. "Explosive Power of the Woman", The Statesman, November 26, 1998. Accessed March 14, 2008.
  13. ^ Somaaya, Bhawana. "Year of Unusuals", The Hindu, November 27, 2008. Accessed March 13, 2008.
  14. ^ Kidwai, Saleem. "Sena fury on Fire," The Independent'', February 5 1999. Accessed March 12, 2008.
  15. ^ a b "Indian activists force cinema to call off 'Fire'", Reuters News, 18 December 1998. Accessed 11 March 2008.
  16. ^ Trehan, Madhu. "When we don't get what we want, we have to get violent", The Hindustan Times, December 13, 1998. Accessed March 14, 2008.
  17. ^ a b "Activists slam attacks on lesbian film, Hindus vow to widen protest," Agence France-Presse, December 3, 1998. Accessed March 13, 2008.
  18. ^ Ghosh, Shohini and Madhavi Shahani Kapur. "From the frying pan to the Fire, Fear of Fire, Communalism Combat, January 1 1999. Accessed March 11, 2008.
  19. ^ "Hindu leader says lesbian film should be about Moslem family", Agence France-Presse, December 14, 1998. Accessed March 12, 2008.
  20. ^ McGirk, Tim. "Plenty of Smoke Over Fire" Time Asia December 21, 1998. Accessed March 13, 2008.
  21. ^ Menon, Ritu. "The fire within", The Indian Express, December 9, 1998. Accessed 13 March, 2008.
  22. ^ Upadhya, Carol. "Set This House on Fire", Economic and Political Weekly, December 12, 1998, 3176-77.
  23. ^ "Sena attacks theatres to douse Fire", The Indian Express, December 3, 1998. Accessed March 10, 2008.
  24. ^ Kishwar, Madhu. "Naive Outpourings of a Self-Hating Indian: Deepa Mehta’s Fire", Manushi, January 1, 1998. Accessed March 15, 2008.
  25. ^ Verma, Suparn. "An interview with Deepa Mehta" Rediff.com, October 24, 1997. Accessed March 10, 2008.
  26. ^ Deshpande, Manisha. "In the line of fire" The Indian Express, December 13, 1998. Accessed March 12, 2008.
  27. ^ Kishwar, Madhu. "Naive Outpourings of a Self-Hating Indian: Deepa Mehta’s Fire", Manushi, January 1, 1998. Accessed March 15, 2008.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fire_(1996_film)&oldid=266444196"