Jump to content

User talk:Yousaf465: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
JSR (talk | contribs)
JSR (talk | contribs)
Line 183: Line 183:


Thanks for the ITN. I will try to reach the article by evening-night. [[User:JSR|'''<font color="red">JSR</font>''']] [[User talk:JSR|'''<font color="gray">0562</font>''']] 09:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the ITN. I will try to reach the article by evening-night. [[User:JSR|'''<font color="red">JSR</font>''']] [[User talk:JSR|'''<font color="gray">0562</font>''']] 09:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

:I'll need some more time (let me look at it for a couple of days). The first thing is my main area of study is science so I am finding this difficult. Secondly I usually like to refer to books and journals neither of which are currently with me for defense related research. The GA review has failed since Jan 11 so the need to renominate the article will arise. After forming an opinion in a couple of days I can help in writing and some expansion. I will also look for books and articles on this incident during the coming 48 hours. [[User:JSR|'''<font color="red">JSR</font>''']] [[User talk:JSR|'''<font color="gray">0562</font>''']] 17:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:44, 2 April 2009

In loving memory of my chotki

Welcome! Please “sign” (~~~~) your messages.

Hello! On Wikipedia, I spend some of the time patrolling recent changes and new pages. If, while doing so, you believe I have made a mistake, please note:
  • Everyone makes mistakes, including (and sometimes, especially) me. Edits I revert, I generally revert as they appear to bevandalism of some sort. If you believe I have made a mistake, justundo my edit, and leave me a message pointing it out to me here. I'll be happy to work with you to fix it.
  • I am not here everyday. If you leave me a message and I don't respond immediately, don't panic! I will get back to you the next time I am online and see your message.
  • Finally, welcome! Please put new posts at the bottom of this page. Cheers!

Please choose a headline for new messages ( == == ). In order to keep discussions together and not to lose track it is important only to talk at one place

If I started a discussion on your talk page, please reply there and not here. However, should I forget to reply there I would appreciate a short reminder here.

If you have left me a message on my talk page (here), I will usually reply here. If I reply somewhere else, I will note that here.

Please place new messages at the bottom of this page or use this [1].


  1. ALL before 22 july 2006

Welcome to Yousaf465's Talk page. Feel free to leave comments and criticism at the bottom of the page:

Start here

Start below this.

Yousaf465,

Indian terror organisations in North America

Hi yousaf i have had a idea about a new article about Indian extremeists in North America and there growing activitys in canada through there radical VHP and lobbyists in Barack Obamas panel maybe wikireader41 could contribute lol :) heres the links

http://www.vhp-america.org/press/Elephant.htm

http://www.france24.com/en/20081115-united-states-politics-obama-indian-slammed-with-extremist-link-accusations

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=9RYs-Z6AdpQC&pg=PA504&lpg=PA504&dq=hindu+nationalism+in+america&source=bl&ots=x0SXn4kiU4&sig=xqyGTALcL9MeK5d3d4O74OPo8vg&hl=en&ei=pt6_SZ3lFdSzjAeJxaw5&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=5&ct=result

86.156.208.231 (talk) 17:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know,but what should I do with these edits.yousaf465'


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Next time you list someone on AIV, make sure they have vandalized after receiving a final, level4 warning or equivalent. This is in reference to User:Mlevy7. bibliomaniac15 03:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked them because it was obvious that they were a vandalism-only account. In the future though, remember to list on AIV after a final warning like {{test4}} or {{uw-vand4}}. bibliomaniac15 04:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Will follow Advice.yousaf465'

Thanks

Thanks for your welcome. Wishes! -Zhinanzhen (talk) 04:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. An alumni. -Zhinanzhen (talk) 05:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks! My Pakistani brother. But seems you gave me a wrong link. unwary, haha. -Zhinanzhen (talk) 06:09, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see. -Zhinanzhen (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

OK. -Zhinanzhen (talk) 06:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

numbered list (#) wikicode

Hi there Yousaf465; this is just a friendly reminder to be careful with how you format comments in numbered list sections. I've had to jigger your comment formatting a couple of times at Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions/Poll [2] [3] because it broke the numbering. Now, numbered lists are easily the worst-implemented feature of our wikicode; it's easy to break things accidentally, and the syntax for doing it right is counterintuitive. However, please just watch and be careful, and use preview if you have to. In particular, you can't use hard returns to add a blank line, even if you want multiple paragraphs; you have to add an unordered list comment at the same level as your first paragraph. Yes, that is painfully stupid. Also, the only syntax that works for adding unordered list comments to a numbered listis to start them with exactly '#:'. Yes, that is even more painfully stupid. There's nothing you or I can do about the bad syntax, though, so please just be careful. Thanks. Gavia immer (talk) 04:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rectified.yousaf465'
Thanks. As I said, I understand making a mistake with that, so long as we make sure the numbering gets corrected. Gavia immer (talk) 05:05, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: ACC tool

The issue has already been discussed with the only people who have power on ACC, the tool administrators. For all points and purposes, this decision is final. If you can keep up good behavior and reapply in a few months, you will probably get accepted. --FastLizard4 (TalkIndexSign) 06:05, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, sorry for misunderstanding what you were trying to say :). The grounds for the denial is based on the fact that the tagging could be described as disruptive, regardless of whether or not the tagging was correct. --FastLizard4 (TalkIndexSign) 06:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pearl Buck a missionary

Actually she was a missionary herself, at least in the sense of being on the payroll of a mission board, until she resigned in 1932. But I agree that the huge Christian missionary sign on the side of her page is out of proportion to the importance in her life, so I agree it should have been removed. ch (talk) 05:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the offer of adoption

I am glad for the offer of adoption as I am quite new and struggling on rules. Initially, can you send me your thoughts relative to the autobio Benito T. de Leon I earlier submitted--it has initially passed nomination for deletion: can I continue editing it or just leave it as is? Thanks and only the best.Sultan-Commander (talk) 03:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected 27 March 2009 Jamrud bombing to 2009 FATA mosque attack, I think that's the article on the evnt. If they are not the same event, I apologise, but I hope you agree it is better if every editor works on the same page. Hiding T 15:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2009 Manawan Police Training School in Lahore attack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JCutter (talk) 04:19, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yousaf465,
The Lahore police academy attack is a new article based on the same incident as the earlier 2009 Lahore police academy attacks. What are your views on the merge discussion? JSR 0562 08:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge is my view.or rename first one to second.Second option is better.yousaf465'

You are the lead contributor so your choice matters most. Do we copy/paste all your content to the second article and then redirect? Then do the same for talk? I'm not sure of the bureaucracy here. JSR 0562 08:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should nevertheless get the credit for creating the first article on WP. Why did'nt you link it anywhere ? JSR 0562 08:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think somebody as already done that.yousaf465'

Redirect done and I have left a small note crediting the article to you. Thank you for your detailed work. JSR 0562 08:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the pie. I hope you contribute to the article and its as good as your other efforts. JSR 0562 08:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Will try,but have to take a short break.yousaf465'

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:51, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit was from Geo or Dawn and very sketchy at the time as it was just happening.

All reports, seemed to be changing from everyone, even differing groups Fazlullah or another want credit. Best I can tell from google earth the site is 33°35' 30.38" N by 74°26' 45.84"E (shows a foot trod running track) and 33° 35'31.07"N x 74° 26' 46' 46.50"E is the only other site which fits the photos. If you have ever been to Lahore, Pak. I am wondering what the 5 or six oval laal (terra cotta) structures are, just off GTroad. Each has a large upright mast at center. I can only guess?Allenwalla (talk) 01:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC) all are two to three km east of the police training camp.[reply]

I will check.Thanks for the coordinates.yousaf465'

The first location is in Kashmir.And second is not workingyousaf465'

The laal structure is a batha( brick making [factory] [4]).yousaf465'

Message from JSR

The ITN was delivered to me. Actually you deserve it so assuming that they had the wrong address, I'm delivering it to you.

Current events globe On 30 March, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Lahore police academy attacks, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

Let me see that article all through today. I will check back in the evening. JSR 0562 05:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Thanks.That article is just away from GA,your contribution will be highly welcome.yousaf465'

Dear Yousaf,
I have just come back dead tired from work. Given my experience on editing when tired I'm not sure I can do much right now. I'm willing to do whatever I can to help you in the article but please give me until tomorrow to do so :) JSR 0562 16:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ITN. I will try to reach the article by evening-night. JSR 0562 09:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll need some more time (let me look at it for a couple of days). The first thing is my main area of study is science so I am finding this difficult. Secondly I usually like to refer to books and journals neither of which are currently with me for defense related research. The GA review has failed since Jan 11 so the need to renominate the article will arise. After forming an opinion in a couple of days I can help in writing and some expansion. I will also look for books and articles on this incident during the coming 48 hours. JSR 0562 17:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]