User talk:Yousaf465/December 2005 - Feb 2009

Image:DSCN2613.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSCN2613.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Iamunknown 23:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:5579529.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5579529.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging articles

If you tag an article, please leave reasons why on the article's talk page. Otherwise we can't figure out what the concern is.

I have RVed the tagging to interceptor. I think I know what you were trying to say from the checkin note, but the article seems very balanced to me. Most of the sections lead off with an example from the USSR.

Maury 22:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Movie camera

No, I don't use a movie camera. Sorry. :( [[User:Nishkid64|Nish<span styl

Status?

Could you please clarify what you mean? Jmlk 1 7 03:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply on my talk page. Jmlk 1 7 03:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attempt to make FA list

Pl. see Wikipedia:Featured lists so that you can chip in with the article President of Pakistan to make it one. Also requested a peer review. --Idleguy 01:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:20070224-DSCN3343.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:20070224-DSCN3343.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:20070224-DSCN3343.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under afree license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:20070224-DSCN3343.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Airblueself.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Airblueself.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Airblueself.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Airblueself.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Rette tast 22:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Karachi riots

Yousaf, I haven't edited that article since we last spoke of it (at least a month ago). If you click the "history" tab on the page, you can see who made the Al Qaeda changed that you seem to think I made. Chantoke 11:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Wp pakistan

Hi Yousaf

Sorry for late answer, i was away,sure i will Help you,when ever you need it.Hope you are doing good in life. Khalidkhoso 13:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lal Masjid

The reference you posted did not mention anything regarding the MMA's body count. Aside from that fact, the MMA is not a reputable organization and is known for exaggerating, and also, 800-1000 is an impossible total which does not even deserve consideration at this point. Afinebalance 05:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please only post this claim ONCE you are able to reference it to an article that cites that number specifically. The article you have attached as a reference contradicts the MMA's claim and reports only between 86-102 casualties, which is why it's not accepted. Also, since this is an English article, the references should be English as well. Politically motivated numbers are absolutely unacceptable on Wikipedia. Afinebalance 05:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then the Npov status of this article will be in doubts.I think those people who will be reading this article can also speak urdu!.The dawn reff was for Goverments claims.User talk:Yousaf465

Excuse me, do you understand how an encyclopedia works? The NPOV status of the article is lost when people begin to write things without referencing them, like you have. You cannot put the claim of 800-1000 claims as an official estimate at the top of the page when you use a government reference of 102. You can place it as a legitimate estimate once multiple news sources (especially non-Indian) are referring to it as a possible claim.

Also, the South Asian media itself is filled with corruption, hypocrisy and exaggeration, and most of them simply don't belong in a legitimate article. Half of the articles say "300 coffins" while Indian media have increased it to "800 coffins", and either of those may have been for precautionary measures. Hundreds of people have been taken to jail, and so on. Please don't bring this sensationlist style of news into this article, and wait until there are multiple and legitimate news sources and after all possible reasons have been elimated. Afinebalance 05:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They made that ruling to keep journalists away from the hospital because you cannot save people's lives when you have dozens of brainless Pakistani reporters blocking ambulances and doctors from doing their jobs. It is difficult to hide 700 extra deaths in ambulances while the media watches along the road, and so on. You must wait for a final answer before reporting such garbage from anti-government people who don't have an education, otherwise feel free to apply as a reporter to ARY or GEO, which were an embarassment to Pakistan because of their reporting, just like most news agencies from our country.Afinebalance 05:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan Studies

Can you please take a look at the article and post your comments on this issue on the talkpage? It would be very appriciated.Thanks.-Vmrgrsergr 04:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi Yousuf,

I hope we didn't get off two the wrong start. I love Pakistan and I love writing for Pakistan on wikipedia. You are more than welcome to contribute to Lal Masjid Siege infact you should but make you sure you don't interject your personal opinion when writing on wikipedia. Mercenary2k 05:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I could use your help on the casualties for the militants, students in the red mosque. See from July 3 to July 10 or something, 20-30 militant students were killed in clashes with the Army. When the Army raided, 90 or so militant students died. Can you find the proper references for the number of students that died prior to the attack ?

Thanks

Mercenary2k 06:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ya

i am on line...why? Mercenary2k 04:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

already did. The article should be called Lal Masjid Siege because thats what it was. Calling it a tragedy is like calling the Virginia Tech Massacare a Tragedy or the Siege of Leningrad a Tragedy. Call it what it is. Mercenary2k 04:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, what do you mean? I dont understand the picture. Its a picture of a PIA planeMercenary2k 04:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

should i go ahead and post it on PIA wiki.User talk:Yousaf465

Go for it post the pic. As for calling the Lal Masjid Siege a tragedy. That still doesn't apply. Look at Moscow theatre hostage siege. The article calls it a siege even though it was Russian citizens vs Russian citizens even though the ethnicity were Chechen. So calling it a tragedy won't work. It should be called a Siege becuase that is what this was. Our brave Army against these cowardly terrorists. Mercenary2k 04:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Man people took the law into their own hands. They said they were planning suicide attacks. They were setting buildings on fire, they kidnapped people, they attacked the police and the army. The government gave them countless opportunities to surrender but they didn't. What else do you expect the government to do? I don't understand why you are siding with these terrorists who have killed hundreds of our brave soldiers. I really don't. If you hate Musharraf, then thats fine. But you can't support these people as they undermine the sovereignty of Pakistan.Mercenary2k 05:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it evertime that a person goes against the Islamic Terrorists in Pakistan like the Lal Mosque goons, people like you blame the media for brainwashing me? I get my news from multiple sources and I have enough brains to make up my own mind. The Army did wait. It waited for 8 Days to let these people surrender. It send it countless religious, political people to persuade the people to surrender. It tried and tried but to no avail. People like you are always gonna come up with stupid conspiracy theories that the Zionist Mush under orders from his Jewish Masters ordered the attack, etc, etc, etc...Give it up. I have had countless debates on this issue. What angers me is that people like you don't support Pakistan, don't support our troops when they are fighting terrorists. I don't need to be in Pakistan to understand what is going on. I have been there enough times, to know the political climate of that country, as well as the going ons over there. The real situation was that a bunch of jihal maulvis took over a mosque started preaching hate under orders from their Arab masters living in FATA areas. The government tolerated their nonsense but after 6 months they decided to act. And I am glad they did but I only wished they acted sooner. Now your buddies have killed over 100 of our troops and started suicide bombing all over Pakistan. We DO NOT APPEASE Terrorists. The people in Lal Mosque were TERRORISTS and they deserved what they got. Mercenary2k 07:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your information

Hi Yousaf465. This is only to let you know that your name has emrged in a discussion. Cheers--Isles Cape^Talk 13:35, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ind mig2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ind mig2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:India shot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:India shot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pl. contribute to Tipu Sultan

Since Tipu was a common hero and much of his history is still plagued (in WP atleast) with biases & historical inaccuracies, I suggest we try to improve this article by adding sourced statements en route to becoming a FA. On a similar note, I feelAurangzeb also has great potential, if ppl put aside their petty quarrels to make it a fine example of a biography although of a controversial man. --Idleguy 05:07, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes it could be a valuable insight to the man from an "inside" perspective. I didn't know his lineage - at least some - is now in Lahore. But I think he must be like great-great-great-grandson atleast? --Idleguy 10:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 15:49, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help

Sorry that I didn't get back to you sooner. How can I be of assistance? Tewfik^Talk 08:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Combined.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Combined.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go tothe image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourCriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nachiketa12.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nachiketa12.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DSC00796.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC00796.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DSC01487.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC01487.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Grenade ad eng.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Grenade ad eng.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot(talk) 03:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: thanks for the information but...

i couldn't find my name over there.User talk:Yousaf465

Sorry for coming back so late! It's here --Isles Cape^Talk 17:09, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sahid_Abbasi.JPG

I have tagged Image:Sahid_Abbasi.JPG as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add{{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Samra_Airblue.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Samra_Airblue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Combined.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Combined.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i-post

Email to Postal Mail

A convenient free postal mail service which can deliver email messages all over Pakistan. Peoples can now use their email to send letters giving you another route to communicate with others who are not connected to the Internet in Pakistan.

In recent past Internet and e-mail have revolutionized the world of communications. But those who do not have easy access to Internet and e-mail facilities could not get benefits of this facility. In its endeavour to make the benefits of e-mail available to a common man, Al Tayyeb Group has introduced i-post service. By i-post all those who do not have computer or do not have access to Internet can send e-mail by Post Office or receive e-mail through a postman. Those who have access to Internet can also send i-post to those who do not have access to Internet.

Wikipedia should have an article on this social service & must be a part of WikiProject Pakistan.Please comments.--SaqibChaudhry (talk) 09:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

indian involvement

the given newslink only talks about indian made guns being used by some groups in NWFP but nothing about India being accused of state sponsored terrorism, in the way that ISI has recently been hounded in the media, including pak's ally USA in its involvement in kabul blasts amongst other things. Infact the source from "The Nation" doesn't "accuse" India of any terrorist involvement, but just the arms case. So rewording to give it a different meaning in the article was out of good faith and I hope you'll remove it yourself. Tx. Idleguy (talk) 10:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs - barring any significantly famous ones - aren't really a reliable source and most of the links you've given don't work anyways. --Idleguy (talk) 15:00, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Except the rediff link, the rest in my talk page give a 404 error. btw, don't you find it a bit amusing that after India, Afghanistan, and most importantly Pak's ally in the "War on Terror", the USofA accused ISI for its involvement in the recent kabul blasts, we have pakistan reporting of these three nations' (including US) trying to support terrorism in Pakistan?US backing terror networks in Pakistan This only proves that Pakistan is hell bent on accusing those who have criticised Pak by counter allegging them with state-sponsored terrorism. --Idleguy (talk) 12:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See [1]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to State sponsored terrorism, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Your recent edits about Indian involment was unconstructive, as it contained a pure original research. Please avoid adding your own conclusion as Wiki is supposed to provide already published information as it is. ThanksSuigeneris (talk) 15:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC) Suigeneris (talk) 15:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to State-sponsored terrorism. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Consistently adding pure Original Research and unreferenced sentences constitute vandalism. Suigeneris (talk) 09:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pl use new section to give this kind of message.

Islamabad Marriott Hotel bombing

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Islamabad Marriott Hotel bombing worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Lihaas (talk) 14:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC) I wasn't experimenting but I was in a hurry.User talk:Yousaf465[reply]

Apologies. Lihaas (talk) 14:41, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On this edit: (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islamabad_Marriott_Hotel_bombing&diff=240378394&oldid=240356633) what was the mention in talk? (i dont disagree, just asking) Lihaas (talk) 14:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. Previously an editor had taken it off citing the unverifiability of youtube as a source, was just copy editing to keep certain controversies out.

Go ahead and add it, but cite the verifiability of the source of the video in your edit summary Lihaas (talk) 11:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Azad Kashmir; Habib R. Sulemani; Fasih Bokhari; Economy of Pakistan; Muhammad Ali Shehki; Mazar-e-Quaid; Noor (actress); Umer Sharif; National police; Nur Khan; Gul Hassan Khan; Salima Hashmi; Transport in Pakistan; Northrop; Junaid Jamshed; Aziz Bhatti Park; Pakistan Peoples Party; Nazia and Zoheb; Hardpoint

Cleanup: Zafarullah Khan Jamali; Terrorism in Pakistan; Nawaz Sharif
Merge: Pulse jet engine; FAST Institute of Computer Science; Committee for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice
Add Sources: Zia-ul-Haq's Islamization; Timeline of Pakistani popular culture; Nawabshah
Wikify: Attock District; Vaneeza Ahmad; Bioterrorism
Expand: Anis Nagi; Police academy; Counter-terrorism

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1268662 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Step hen 08:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irgun

Please review WP:TERRORIST. This word should not be used unattributed, certainly not in the defining sentence. The fact that they were called a terrorist organization by many people is already detailed in the second paragraph of the lead. --Nudve (talk) 08:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's nice, but the word "terrorist" should not be used as a definition altogether. -- Nudve (talk) 09:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is a guideline. -- Nudve (talk) 09:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, yes. -- Nudve (talk) 09:35, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Would you mind moving your "individuals" stuff to the main article? If you dont think thats right, could you move it below the UN and other organisations and start a talk page discussion on its importance? Thanks! Superpie (talk) 05:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

International reaction to the 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict

Hello. I see you've been around for awhile, so I'm curious why you thought it appropriate toa 2003 photo from a San Francisco rally to an article about 2009 airstrikes? --DavidShankbone 16:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Pakistan featured pictures

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed onCategory:Pakistan featured pictures, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted becauseCategory:Pakistan featured pictures has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deletingCategory:Pakistan featured pictures, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact thebot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haddin

This:

Brad Haddin did not make an effort to prevent Neil Broom from leaving the field after the wicketkeeper dislodged the bails in a bowled dismissal in Perth. When Neil Broom was bowled in the First match of the Chappell-Hadlee Series in Melbourne,but the replays showed that Haddin's glow's touched the stumps before ball has crossed the stumps.So Neil Broom should have been considered not out.It should have been called a no-ball

is all your opinion and has no place in an article. Until such time as you can provide a NPOV version of events, I will continue to remove this content. --Mattinbgn\^talk 04:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now an NPOV version has been added (from a NZ source no less). Mindless vandalism has seen the article semi-protected but this should not prevent you from making any changes if you wish. Adding large blockquotes to the article would seem to me to breachWP:UNDUE. By the way I am very familiar with what the international reaction has been. If you are curious, take a look atthis article for some history. --Mattinbgn\^talk 05:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Having a logo showing doesn't make it any less of a copyright violation. Personally, I am happy to see Haddin kicked out of the Australian team, not because he is a cheat (although he may well be), but because he is a very ordinary wicket-keeper. I hold no special regard for him. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 09:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I forget to added the ref.SO instead of removing it you should have added the ref which is[2]. You may edit it to make it according to the wiki guidelines.I have no objection to that.Feel free to edit it.P.s don't forget to read the comments although they have nothing to do with the wikipedia but they can show what people think about this incident. comments are not meant for wiki.User talk:Yousaf465 User talk:Yousaf465

Nopv section has been added so don't revert it or you will be referred.User talk:Yousaf465

Well then it's ok.There is something strange happening at my home right now will check later.User talk:Yousaf465

Why was it being vandalized they are getting too furious I think.User talk:Yousaf465

Re: What is your e-mail

Hello Yousaf, sure, my email address is trulyinsane@gmail.com Faraz (talk) 21:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yousaf465 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No warning was given.No mention on my talk page.No specific information given.He seems to be biased against me due to my edits on Brad haddin page.And also he or someone related to him, seems to be operating from the ip 70.112.77.127.If he had some issue it should have been dicussed instead of imposing a ban.

Decline reason:

Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read ourguide to appealing blocks for more information. — Aitias// discussion 18:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State-sponsored_terrorism&diff=269930561&oldid=269783007.

I contacted the blocking administrator for additional commentary. Please be patient. seicer | talk |contribs 13:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

YellowMonkey (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) has failed to respond in a speedy manner and has conducted other edits since the initial message was relayed. I see no justification for the block, which is in accordance with other comments made on this matter.seicer | talk |contribs 03:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: seicer | talk | contribs 03:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

February 2009

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to State-sponsored terrorism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Tinu Cherian - 11:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Johan Lundgren

A tag has been placed on Johan Lundgren requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 06:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are on WP:ANI

Hello, Yousaf465. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Tinu Cherian -05:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Subscription

US works copy right

Regarding this , I request you to please read Work_of_the_United_States_Government . Kindly stop your disruptive edits !-- Tinu Cherian - 05:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 h in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Please stop disruptive anti-Indian edits and disruptions of pictures as discussed onWikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Yousaf465_on_an_Anti-India_Propoganda. You were laready blocked for this. You are welcome to make usefulcontributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Alex Bakharev (talk) 06:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I Already read that before marking it.This lab. is not listed on in lab pages listed in wikipedia.

"Please note that national laboratories operate under varying licenses and some are not free. Check the site policies of any national lab before crediting it with this tag." See this before removing tag.[3].User:Yousaf465

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yousaf465 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocking is unfair as my edits have been endorsed by other non-related editors.for further explanation see below.

Decline reason:

Attacking Yellowmonkey below is not a good way to get unblocked. It is quite clear from the ANI thread cited above that your block is not for a single, specific action but rather for a long pattern of tendentious behavior. Since you have not addressed this behavior, as explained in detail at the ANI thread cited above, and you have given no assurances that you intend to stop, I see no reason to unblock at this time. Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yellowmonkey either doesn't understand simple English or is trying to be over nationalist,the main page controversy is baseless.I wasn't trying to be natinalist or any such thing.My only point was that it should be diversified.2)If you see the file history it can be seen,that,this file at first had dead links.I tagged it that way.Another editor provided the links to it.I asked him to check with the mentioned lab. whether they provide it for wikipedia.The herald has also been questioned by other non-concerned editors[4],[5],[6],so there is no point in blaming me for that.4)Be sensible and Read carefully a)Image description b)Tag description c) talk pages[7].Before accusing anyone of racial bias.5)I didn't revert this any further because a valid reason was given.I can't see any reinsertion byUser:Seicer at this [8]User:Yellowmonkey is going out of his mind.He and other involved editor didn't even took pain to discuss these articles and file on the talk page.Instead have constantly removing content while hiding behind ips as it mentioned here.[9].Taquiyya is actually Taqiyya. I myself removed content which was questionable but Instead of making on it they just kept on reverting edits.User:Yousaf465

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yousaf465 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

will remain away from sst article.

Decline reason:

As above, this does not adequately address the reason for your block. Sandstein 09:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Per this ublock request (21 February 2009) the user claims that "he will stay away from the above SST " article, but today (23 February 2009)he is still edit warring on the article like this -- Tinu Cherian - 12:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The request was not upheld.So for me it's not possible now.User:Yousaf465

Sorry, that talks of hypocrisy -- TinuCherian - 04:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As you wish.User:Yousaf465

It could have been,if I didn't followed my word after being unblocked.User:Yousaf465

Reply

No problem. As for the dawn source for the terrorist group status, I'm not too sure it's necessary. But, the entire article, particularly the part about the different countries. India doesn't need three sections, especially when Pakistan and Iran, especially Iran have been accused by more countries. And all the countries so far are written as accusations, and there are no response from what the governments has said. Plus, there are several countries missing. Bangladesh I'm sure has been accused by India, Israel is accused by several countries in the middle east, etc.Deavenger (talk) 04:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of User talk:Sandbox for user warnings

Please note that AfD is the wrong deletion process for user talk pages. I have moved the discussion to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Sandbox for user warnings, and indicated that when speedy closing the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User talk:Sandbox for user warnings which you initiated. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't meant for that.I used it as a sandbox not for deletion.User:Yousaf465

Re Siamse Cats

Can you send me pics of your cats.I had two Cats both male,one was gray,white mix and other was brown white mix.Gray white ran away,and chutki died in a road accident.User:Yousaf465

Very sorry to hear about the accident. Here's mine --a female called Wiki. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 16:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removed

Insert non-formatted text here

I'm watching you!

Hello

Hi, My name is Adil and I m a regular editor of Wikipedia, I edit articles related to indo-pak history such as..... Indo-Pak wars, Khemkaran, Line Of Control, Muhammad Ghori and Prithviraj chauhan history etc... As u might be aware that there are a few Indians trying to spread false myths about indo-pak history and they have formed a lobby of some sort....I saw your edit on colonel prohit...Unfortunately it had also been changed....But I changed it back to your version......I was really glad to finally see a Pakistani editor on Wikipedia.....and I was hoping to teaming up with you just so that we can help each other in case one of us gets blocked for some reason as it happened to me a few days back....That way we can work more efficiently.....Best Wishes..... Adil your (talk) 23:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We have to follow Wp:BLP for his article.ANd as a general rule ,

1.don't maintain a sock puppy 2.And find reliable sources before adding something 3.follow WP:NPOV 4.And follow Wp:OR User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Is there a Pakistani Administrator on wiki...?? and my email address is adil_your@hotmail.com 117.102.36.207 (talk) 15:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, email address?

Thanks for adding your comment to the JF-17 article. Do you need my email for some reason? I would prefer to communicate on the talk pages. I have added my support vote to the national anthem sound clip. Hj108 (talk) 18:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Books extension enabled
News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 20:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re. your comment

Speedy deletions don't require discussion. What you wrote didn't in any way establish the notability of the product. Keeping in mind that nothing here is ever lost, please maintain a civil tone on user talk pages. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being too harsh and replied on your page.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Don't sweat it. It's the risk I run doing new pages patrol. Tell you what: I'll restore the article for you so that you can expand it. Since everyone's spreading cookies, enjoy a bite. :)) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PMDrive1061 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promoteWikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Cool! I do in fact have a kitty at home! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear it. Mine has a somewhat happier story. She and a couple of other kittens from her litter were rescued from a really bad situation. My cat had been locked in a tool shed for nearly two weeks without food or water. How she survived I'll never know. She's all grown up now and she's the greatest cat I've ever had. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take good care of that kitty. Talk to you soon. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:33, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Sri Lankan cricket team attack

I have moved the link back to its original name, as it more accurately reflects what took place, and how it is referenced in media and elsewhere. Please consider discussion and coming to consensus before moving it. --Mhking (talk) 03:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Mhking. Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 04:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on article talkpage.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

What's happened (happening) in your country is a terrible thing, although I personally can only see things getting worse.Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 09:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron, thanks for the upbeat assessment on Pakistan. Pahari Sahib 13:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well,things will change just wait and watch.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

No prob :) haha. Hopefully for your sake and the worlds sake, things will change. Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 06:22, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For us it is normal life.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Page moves

I don't know how long you've been editing Wikipedia, so pardon me for assuming that you're fairly new. There's two things I'd like to bring to your attention: first, we have a way of doing things that says "Be bold - revert - discuss". That means that people are encouraged to be bold, but when your bold action is reverted, instead of doing it again, stop and discuss it first. your initial page move of the cricket team attack article was fine, but when it was undone, instead of doing it again, you should have gone to the talk page and developed a consensus for what you were trying to do. And before discussing, make sure you're familiar with our naming guidelines. The second thing that I'd like to bring to your attention is that when there's a move war, like what you engaged in, it leaves behind a big mess of double and sometimes triple redirects that others have to clean up. This time, a bot took care of it, but nevertheless, move wars are definitely not a good idea. Thanks for your cooperation. AKRadecki^Speaketh 15:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice and I didn't moved it further.Discussion is taking place,and I 'm also contributing to it.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

JavaScript

[10][11] Why do you keep adding that? Is something wrong with your browser? —SpaceRocket (talk) 03:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be.Will check.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Thanks

For the personal message and for taking care of the link. You have been working hard on this. I hope that this experience is good since you are putting a lot of hard work in the article :) JSR 0562 06:36, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pie and for the link to Google policy. I have given up on the idea of using Google Earth in the article. The map of the location that you made is a good and viable substitute to the Google Earth image and does the job excellently. Hope to see you at Talk:2009 Lahore attack on Sri Lankan cricket team and further hope that this turns out to be a good experience since you are working hard on the article :) JSR 0562 05:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikireader

hi could you please remove the edits made by wikireader who is a pov pusher on the article on lahore attacks he keeps insisting that some loner mp speaks for indian people i suggest you report or remove the statements made in the response section it has no value at all looking at his edit history he seems to have a addiction with pov pushing against pakistan86.158.178.202 (talk) 14:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this is most likely te banned user Nangparbat. see User:Hersfold/Vandal_watch#Nangparbat. ignore these rants. cheers;-)--Wikireader41 (talk) 22:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Yousaf,

Long time! Just drop me an email in my discussion page and I'll get back to you more often. I am also working on the Pakistan International Airlines page and other Pakistani related pages. Would love to hear suggestions on the PIA page. Redone most of it.. accuracy interms of text and working on. Thanks. --Fast track (talk) 05:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar, I've been busy and didnt notice it until now. Unfortunatily, I am not that good at finding info for copyright stuff and am limited on helping you for the Qaumi Tarana file.

Also I noticed you were one of the firsts to edit the Siege of Lal Masjid article. Have you seen it now? --→ Ãlways Ãhëad (talk) 01:48, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did You Know problem

Hello! Your submission of Elite Police at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Art LaPella (talk) 22:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is now long enough according to C1. As the top of my talk page states, I do basic proofreading, but not approvals. The others were also objecting to short sections, so removing some headers would probably satisfy them. Art LaPella (talk) 15:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan International Airlines

This article has numerous issues that need to be addressed before it is ready for a GA nomination. The logo in the infobox needs to be reduced in size, the "free" images need to have the non-free logo cropped out of them, the empty section "retired" needs expanding, and the referencing needs to be improved, drastically. There are some whole sections that go completely without references. J Milburn (talk) 10:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't the review, reviews are a little more intense than that! I think your best bet would be to withdraw the nomination for now and continue to work on the article- it actually meets some of the quick-fail crtieria, as it uses images without license templates, and includes several images that are tagged as free when they are actually non-free (due to the use of the non-free logo). J Milburn (talk) 10:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're not a regular editor of the article? Have you at least consulted the regular editors before the nomination, as directed onWP:GAC? The logo needs to only be a little larger than it appears in the infobox- perhaps 250 by 100 px, depending on the proportions. Any of the images (apart from the logo) that include the logo should remove it, as it counts as a non-free component, and it's also important to verify that they haven't been taken from the airline's website. Sources also really need to be added before this is ready for GAC. J Milburn (talk) 10:24, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's fine then. If they were created by the enthusiasts, that's great, but they should not contain the logo. J Milburn (talk) 10:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dyk

Hello, Yousaf465. You have new messages at Rjanag's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Harahan

revisions to madbailey are not acts of vandalism... thanks —Precedingunsigned comment added by 70.171.106.105 (talk) 05:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC) Restored.[reply]

Should have signed your comments.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

sorry about not signing earlier... new to the system... thanks again... 70.171.106.105(talk) 05:58, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thanks... but, first, i need to direct another website to the updated version of this harahan, la page... do you know how i do this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by70.171.106.105 (talk) 06:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thanks... but, first, i need to direct another website to the updated version of this harahan, la page... do you know how i do this? 70.171.106.105 (talk) 06:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Babar Awan

sir, the infobox u have re-located to the main page still requires entries in the fields marked (required). thanks.Najafhaider (talk) 12:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know.will fix it.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Rollback

Hi, I've given you rollback. Please remember to use it against vandalism only, not on tests or good faith edits. You can test it out here. Happy vandal-fighting. bibliomaniac 1 5 20:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a warning is enough. bibliomaniac 1 5 05:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Choi

Please expand your nomination on this page. Merely citing a policy doesn't explain how it applies to the article in question. -Mgm|^(talk) 10:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Talkback

Hello, Yousaf465. You have new messages at Odie5533's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Odie5533 (talk) 05:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ACC Tool

Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. Prodego ^talk 18:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to create pages for Reed's, Inc. and Reed's Ginger Brew. I am having trouble with the categories. Would you mind looking at these pages and making suggestions? I am brand new to Wikipedia and there is a LOT to learn. I don't want to make mistakes and get these pages deleted. Thank you for your help

Irthcomm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irthcomm(talk • contribs) 00:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied.yousaf465'

Wiki taskforce

See my reply at Wikipedia:Help desk#Wiki taskforce. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks, I am just starting out doing things for wikipedia, I am sure I'll have lots of questions :D

Nick Pchelin (talk) 00:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your welcome and the basic info. My attitude towards editing content will be cautious and respectful. Most of it will be in the mathematics and history of mathematics pages. Sometimes I'll edit (without comment) typos and grammar. I'm a bit finicky that way. Aliotra (talk) 01:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

help

how do you write an artical? thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckehqkqh(talk • contribs) 00:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

I have been using Wikipedia for over a year now, and I think I am ready to start contributing. So far I have only fixed minor typos, but I would like to learn how to do more. Ghanima4 (talk) 04:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments.Please feel free to contact me.yousaf465'

Thank you

Thanks for the warm welcome Yousaf465. I can't think of any questions at the moment but I am sure some will arise as I edit further. Please let me know of any better ways I can contibute to wikipedia. Cheers.Inmysolitude (talk) 05:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First of all read your welcome message carefully. It has many important rules.yousaf465'

Yes thank you. I have already read the five pillars and the manual of style.Inmysolitude (talk) 05:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Account Creation Interface

Your request to be approved to use the Internal Account Creation Interface is pending review, and needs your approval.
To prevent people from impersonating Wikipedia users to gain access to ACC, we require all requests to be verified by the requesting user. These are the details:

Requested username on ACC: yousaf465
Wikipedia username referenced: yousaf465

Please let me know on my talk page whether or not you have made this request. If you did, the request will be reviewed. If you did not, the request will be denied and you won't be bothered again. --FastLizard4(Talk•Index•Sign) 05:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You request to be approved to use the Internal Account Creation Interface has been denied. You have been blocked before and have a history on ANI, if for nothing else, disruptive tagging. The sensitive nature of ACC requires editors that have extremely good histories on Wikipedia. However, if in a few months or so you can show edit stability, we (the ACC administrators) may be willing to reconsider your request. --FastLizard4(Talk•Index•Sign) 06:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]