Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress/RU Severe: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 01:29, 14 November 2005

RU Severe

November 2005

Anonrtgtt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Stalking me personally. Please block. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 01:14, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Woohookitty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - It should be plainly obvious to anyone with a brain, who is stalking who--Anonrtgtt 01:16, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's against general guidelines but I'm blocking this person myself. I didn't respond to this person once. Not once. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 01:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that not only have I been blocked unlawfully, but I've been blocked by an editor with a past history of having been blocked for the very thing she accuses me of blocked "User:Woohookitty" with an expiry time of 48 hours (Stalking me. I can't wait for someone to do this for me. She's hit me 7-8 times in the last half an hour), to top it all off, she abused her admin powers and unblocked herself--Anonrtgt 01:29, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Giles22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - sockpuppet account created to vandalize Matt Drudge page through blanking at will. Has ignored Talk Page discussion, and has blanked section of Matt Drudge page at least 10 times in the last hour. --Eleemosynary 19:48, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Swollib (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -- numerous wilful alterations of factual information, links, etc. within articles, with the edit summary "fix minor typo". Shortly after noticing one of these, reverting it, and plastering TEST4 on his page, I went through his contributions list and found the very recent destruction of the article on Iraq, an article that starts with the SGML comment "Anyone found vandalising this article may be blocked for up to 24 hours with no further warning". Please block this vandal right now: he appears to be continuing to fiddle with articles even as I write this. -- Hoary 06:20, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hottentot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) --He keeps vandalising the Azeri article. Historians since ancient times have reported the presence of Medes who are Iranic since 720 BC. A few Turkish tribes joined Medes just 800 years ago. Hottentot wants to pass Medes' originality for Turkic people. I've warned him both in 'history' and 'discussion' section many times BUT ... and he has no sources backing his claim. He is messing with the history of Iranian peoples. 83.99.95.168 16:22, 8 November 2005 (UTC)Mike01[reply]
Diacrit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (blocked) - persistent user who creates numerous user names to remove Template:Foreignchar from various articles. Created user names include: User:Jeaijij, User:Agraman, User:Oagafauou, User:Qesecaue, User:Uefot, User:Huaelo, User:Bifo, User:Timoa, User:Feoouubiao, User:Eooaqinol, User:Xeuuces, and that's only ones I have caught on recent changes page. Most of them have only 1 edit. Renata3 22:29, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Number of sockpuppets is in the dozens and growing. See Category:Wikipedia:Suspected sockpuppets of Diacrit. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:57, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - As of this moment, all sockpuppets have been blocked and all their edits reverted. However, we can expect more.
Mr. Winterbottom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and other sockpuppets at Iraqi insurgency - see details below at #Possible_Sockpuppets. – Quadell ^{(talk) (bounties)} 22:00, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Same person as "Diacrit" above (in the latest round he used the same sockpuppet names for both Iraqi insurgency and the "Foreignchar" articles. -- Curps 18:14, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Blocked indefinately by Mysekurity 04:32, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Shadenator (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) taunting edits to Laughter and another article. Warned twice. Mamawrit es ^{& listens} 15:43, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Now he's using sodium bicarbonate to exchange notes with another student in a chemistry lab! Mamawrit es ^{& listens} 17:22, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aabaas (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -> repeated hateful edits int the article Israel. Quite annoying actually abakharev 03:58, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

October 2005

Surbian_Legsmith (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -- Possible WoW sockpuppet (uses on wheels in a comment), blanks and bloats User articles. Sceptre 11:01, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely by Sjakkalle. 18:34, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Nivik77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) added this edit [1] to the Rosa Parks article, which I am, obviously, personally insulted by. Hell, if he gets away with this I'll stop taking anything seriously around here and add my own "personal thoughts" into articles - not serious : ) Molotov (talk) 03:07, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stopped for now, but this guy has been blocked before and warned extensively. I will block again on sight if he makes a single additional vandalizing edit. Jdavidb (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Very nice warning, by the way. Jdavidb (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Very very nice! Could this, or a version of this, be considered as a {{subst:testX}} template? By the way, as a white guy, I was also personally insulted by Nivik77's "joke". ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 21:00, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely by Dmcdevit at 2005-10-26 06:16:38. Jdavidb [[talk • contribs]] 18:31, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

4.8.15.16.23.42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -- performing mass vandalism at a very fast rate. --Dan East 21:33, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :* {{vandal|Woohookitty}} - It should be plainly obvious to anyone with a brain, who is stalking who--[[User:Anonrtgtt|Anonrtgtt]] 01:16, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 ::I know it's against general guidelines but I'm blocking this person myself. I didn't respond to this person once. Not once. --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|(cat scratches)]]</sup> 01:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
+:::Please note that not only have I been blocked unlawfully, but I've been blocked by an editor with a past history of '''having been blocked''' for the very thing she accuses me of ''blocked "User:Woohookitty" with an expiry time of 48 hours (Stalking me. I can't wait for someone to do this for me. She's hit me 7-8 times in the last half an hour)'', to top it all off, she abused her admin powers and unblocked herself--[[User:Anonrtgt|Anonrtgt]] 01:29, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * {{vandal|Giles22}} - sockpuppet account created to vandalize [[Matt Drudge]] page through blanking at will. Has ignored Talk Page discussion, and has blanked section of Matt Drudge page at least 10 times in the last hour. --[[User:Eleemosynary|Eleemosynary]] 19:48, 9 November 2005 (UTC)